• Korea journal of population studies
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.271-291
• /
• 2002

According to a system-wide analysis utilizing the raw data of Korean urban households survey, the expenditure elasticity estimate of alcoholic demand is around 0.71, which implies the demand for alcoholic consumption is relatively necessary The own price elasticity estimates are pretty elastic between -1.79 and 2.10. The trend of price elasticity estimates shows to be more elastic recently from the past.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.93-103
• /
• 2002

우리 국민의 교통수요행태를 분석하기 위하여 준이상수요체계(almost ideal demand system) 함수형태의 집계교통수요모형을 설정하였다. 대중교통수단으로서 시내버스, 시외버스, 택시, 기차, 전철이 그리고 개인교통수단으로서 연료비가 포함되었으며, 기타재화 및 서비스에 대한 소비지출이 함께 추정되었다. 추정에 이용된 자료는 통계청의 "도시가계연보"에 수록된 '전국 도시가구 소비지출'과 "물가통계"에 수록된 '전국 도시소비자 물가'이다. 추정결과 모형의 설명력을 나타내는 수정결정계수(adjusted-$R^2$)는 대부분 0.9 내외에서 높게 나타났다. 추정계수는 총 51개중에서 25개가 5% 수준에서 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 추정된 계수값을 이용하여 가격탄력성과 소득탄력성을 구하였다. 자기가격탄력성과 소득탄력성 추정치는 조금 높기는 하나 부호와 상대적 크기가 모두 예상과 일치하고 다른 연구결과들과 유사한 범위에 있다. 연료비에 대한 소득탄력성은 1.72로 가장 높게 나타났고, 대중교통수단은 0.03~0.49 사이에서 나타나므로 교통수단이 정상재임을 의미한다. 보상수요의 교차가격탄력성은 총 15개의 교차관계에서 12개의 관계가 상식과 일치한다. 다음 연구에서는 더 많은 시계열자료를 발굴하여, 장기간의 교통수요 변화에 대한 분석을 시도할 필요가 있다. 또한 초월대수함수나 동태함수 등 다양한 형태의 수요함수를 시도할 필요가 있다. 여러가지 형태의 교통수요함수추정을 통해서 우리 현실에 적합한 교통수요모형을 발견할 수 있을 것이다. 대도시와 중소도시 등 지역별 지출자료를 발굴하여 지역특성을 반영하는 교통수요함수의 추정도 필요하다.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.559-577
• /
• 2003

This paper analyzes household bottled water and water purifier expenditures, taking into account three important characteristics: expenditures may be censored at zero, may be interdependent across expenditure type, and may be endogenously and jointly determined. Censoring, interdependence, and endogeneity of the two expenditures are examined through simultaneous equation bivariate Tobit model. Expenditure function parameters are estimated using a 1997 household survey data collected in Seoul. The study detected interdependence between the two expenditures in the data. Moreover, the coefficient of one expenditure variable is statistically significant in the other expenditure equation. Thus, the overall results show that the simultaneous equation bivariate Tobit model employed here is appropriate for this analysis of the two expenditures. Finally estimated income and household size elasticities of the expenditures are presented.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.40 no.7
• /
• pp.101-118
• /
• 2002

This study examined the levels and trends in the household expenditure in both public and private education. Between 1982 and 2000, the level of the total educational expenditure increased by 5% in each year on average, increased by 2.2% for public education, and by 11.4% for private education. On the public educational expenditure, the consumption expenditure elasticity was 0.2 and the price elasticity was 1.49. On the private educational expenditure, the consumption expenditure elasticity was 1.5 and became below 1 after 1998, and the price elasticity was 2.63. The results indicated that the educational expenditure was necessary rather than luxurious and there was excess demand for private education. The level of the educational expenditure would continue to increase without reforms both in the supply and demand sides.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.195-216
• /
• 1994

탈세(脫稅)의 규모추정(規模推定)을 위해서는 우선 과세표준의 누락정도를 추정해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 1987년과 1988년 도시가계조사 테이프를 이용하여 소득(所得)-지출추계방법(支出推計方法)에 의해 탈루소득(脫漏所得)이 전체소득(全體所得)에서 차지하는 비중을 추정하였다. 그 결과 1987, 1988년 두 해의 탈루소득(脫漏所得)의 규모는 전체 GNP의 약 15%인 것으로 추정되었다. 다시 이렇게 추정된 탈루소득비율(脫漏所得比率)을 이용하여 소득세(所得稅)의 탈세규모(脫稅規模)를 추정하였으며, 그 규모가 전체소득세(全體所得稅)에서 차지하는 비중은 1987년에 10~11.3%, 1988년에는 8.7~9.8%에 달하는 것으로 추정된다. 한편 부가가치세(附加價値稅)의 과세표준인 민간소비지출(民間消費支出)의 탈루규모(脫漏規模)는 전체탈루소득(全體脫漏所得)과 거시민간소비함수(巨視民間消費函數)에 추정된 민간소비(民間消費)의 대(對)GNP탄력성을 이용하여 추정한 결과, 1987, 1988년 모두 10.5%인 것으로 추정되었다. 이에 따라 1987, 1988년의 부가가치세(附加價値稅)의 탈세규모(脫稅規模)는 10.5~16.5%에 달했던 것으로 추정된다.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.61-73
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to compare the consumption expenditure patterns and the effects of socioeconomic variables on expenditure between single-mother families and two-parent families. From the 2001 Household Income and Expenditure Survey conducted by Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO), 693 single-mother families and 14,439 two-parent families were selected. A t-test was completed to examine how the expenditure patterns of two types of families differ. Total expenditures and expenditures on 11 consumption categories were modeled as functions of permanent income and other socioeconomic variables. Also, dummy variable interaction technique was used to examine whether the independent variables differently affected the expenditures between single-mother families and two-parent families. The results of this study indicated that there were differences between single-mother and two-parent families in the levels and shares of expenditures of each consumption category, and the effects of socioeconomic variables on expenditures. Single-mother families had spent less than did two-parent families in each consumption category. However, single-mother families had significantly higher expenditure shares for food at home, shelter, utilities, apparel and shoes, and education. Income elasticities for food at home, shelter, utilities, and education of single-mother families were significantly larger than those of two- parent families.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.44 no.6 s.220
• /
• pp.163-174
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this research was to examine the level and trends in household clothing expenditure in Korea. Raw data sets produced by the National Statistical Office from the Family Income and Expenditure Survey from 1991 to 2004 were used to support time-series and cross-sectional analyses. The clothing expenditures decreased severely and quickly during the economic crisis of late 1997 through 1998, then increased slowly after the economic crisis until 2003, only to slightly decrease again in 2004. The ratio of clothing expenditure to total household expenditure decreased from 8.03% in 1991 to 5.11% in 2004. This decrease in relative clothing expenditure was greater in the lower income group than in the middle and high income groups. Clothing expenditure patterns were unique and differed from other household expenditures. Although the economic crisis in the late 1990s affected Korean consumers' clothing expenditure, clothing expenditure patterns showed a more fundamental and structural change from 1991 to 2004, with the overall decrease in such expenditure resulting from the concurrent increase in educational and information-communication related expenditures. Clothing expenditure was shown to be luxurious through cross-sectional analysis, but necessary through time-series analysis.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.171-200
• /
• 1998

천연가스의 소비실태를 조사하기 위하여 실시한 표본조사자료를 이용하여 가정용 천연가스의 소비가 실증적으로 필수재의 성격을 가지는지를 조사하였다. 이를 위해 가장 일반적인 개념인 천연가스 소비의 소득에 대한 탄력성을 추정하였고, 다른 에너지와의 상대적인 비교를 위하여 광열비 지출에서의 천연가스 소비비 중의 소득에 대한 민감도를 추정하여 광열비 일반에 대한 천연가스 소비의 상대적 필수재의 성격을 파악하였고, 가정용 천연가스의 용도인 취사용과 난방용의 상대적 필수재 특성을 살피기 위하여 가스의 위험인지도에 대한 천연가스의 용도별 반응을 추정하였다. 이로부터 얻은 결과는 다음과 같다. 우선, i) 가정용 천연가스의 소비는 일반적으로 용도에 관계없이 필수재의 성격을 지니고 있으며, ii) 다른 에너지원과 비교를 위한 광열비에서의 천연가스 소비비 중의 소득 변화에 대한 반응을 보았을 때, 모형에 따라 다르나, 취사용이나 난방용이나 광열비 일반에 비하여 필수재 성격을 가진 것으로 나타나고 있으며, iii) 취사용 천연가스의 소비가 상대적으로 난방용에 비하여 필수재의 성격을 가진 것으로 나타나고 있다.

• Korea journal of population studies
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.257-289
• /
• 2002

In this study we analyse how the tobacco prices have an effect on the national health. The level of tobacco price will fluctuate its consumers demand and eventually affect the national health status. We estimate tobacco consumption function as well as households'demand system in which tobacco and health expenditure functions are included. Demand elasticities are estimated and evaluated in order to find future policies to improve the national health by controlling the national tobacco consumption There are two econometric approaches app1ied in this study. The lent tobacco demand analysis method is mm tobacco consumption function model. Using national indices of tobacco price, tobacco consumption and other related variables, tobacco consumption function is estimated. The other is micro demand system analysis by using Korean urban households expenditure data during the period of 1991 to 1999. The own price elasticity which is estimated from national tobacco demand per capita is -0.19 for all people and -0.176 for the adults over 18, which means 100% price increase will cause decease of tobacco demand at 19% and 17.6% per each The cross vice elasticity which is estimated between tobacco and health expenditure of urban households demand system is -0.2328, which implies 100% of tobacco price increase will decrease 23.28% of health expenditure. The low price elasticities imply that tobacco price increase will increase total tobacco sales volume. 100% of tobacco price increase will bring about 79% increase of total tobacco sales volume according to our scenario. Korea's tobacco demand is negatively responsive to fluctuations in its price. The health expenditure is also negatively relatedto the tobacco price fluctuation. These empirical outputs could be utilized as the basis of government's tax policy to control national tobacco consumption in the future.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.371-383
• /
• 1999

This report gave analysis of food demand both in Korea and Japan through introducing the concept of cohort analysis to the conventional demand model. This research was done to clarify the factors which determine food demand of the household. The traits of the new model for demand analysis are to consider and quantify those effects on food demand not only of economic factors such as expenditure and price but also of non-economic factors such as the age and birth cohort of the householder. The results of the analysis can be summarized as follows: 1) The comparison of the item-wise elasticities of food demand demonstrates that the expenditure elasticity is higher in Korea than in Japan and that the expenditure elasticity is -0.1 for cereal and more than 1 for eating-out in both countries. In respect to price elasticity, the absolute values of all the items except alcohol and cooked food are higher in the Korea than in Japan, and especially the price elasticities of beverages, dairy products and fruit are predominantly higher in Japan. In this way, both expenditure and price elasticities of a large number of items are higher in Korea than in Japan, which may be explained from the fact that the level of expenditure is higher in Japan than in Korea. 2) In both of Korea and Japan, as the householder grows older, the expenditure for each item increases and the composition of expenditure changes in such a way that these moves may be regarded as due to the age effect. However, there are both similarities and differences in the details of such moves between Korea and Japan. Those two countries have this trait in common that the young age groups of the householder spend more on dairy products and middle age groups spend more on cake than other age groups. In the Korea, however, there can be seen a certain trend that higher age groups spend more on a large number of items, reflecting the fact that there are more two-generation families in higher age groups. Japan differs from Korea in that expenditure in Japan is diversified, depending upon the age group. For example, in Japan, middle age groups spend more on cake, cereal, high-caloric food like meat and eating-out while older age groups spend more for Japanese-style food like fish/shellfish and vegetable/seaweed, and cooked food. 3) The effect of the birth cohort effect was also demonstrated. The birth cohort effect was introduced under the supposition that the food circumstances under which the householder was born and brought up would determine the current expenditure. Thus, the following was made clear: older generations in both countries placed more emphasis upon stable food in their composition of food consumption; the share of livestock products, oil/fats and externalized food was higher in the food composition of younger generation; differences in food composition among generations were extremely large in Korea while they were relatively small in Japan; and Westernization and externalization of diet made rapid increases simultaneously with generation changes in Korea while they made any gradual increases in Japan during the same time period. 4) The four major factors which impact the long-term change of food demand of the household are expenditure, price, the age of the householder, and the birth cohort of the householder. Investigations were made as to which factor had the largest impact. As a result, it was found that the price effect was the smallest in both countries, and that the relative importance of the factor-by-factor effects differed among the two countries: in Korea the expenditure effect was greater than the effects of age and birth cohort while in Japan the effects of non-economic factors such as the age and birth cohort of householder were greater than those of economic factors such as expenditures.