• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.229-235
• /
• 2011

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological result of arthroscopic Mattress Locking suture repair to that of a Simple suture repair with small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: Among 92 patients who were followed up after arthroscopic repair in patients with small and medium-sized rotator cuff tear from April 2007 to October 2010, 27 patients who took Arthroscopic Mattress Locking suture were set as group I and 65 patients who took Simple suture were set as Group II. The average age of patients were 58 years old and average follow-up period was 30 months. For analysis, VAS, ASES and KSS were used to analyze the range of joint movement and pain. And, for the image result, MRI performed after operation were evaluated. Results: The average VAS, KSS, UCLA score and ASES prior to surgery improved in the last follow-up (p<0.001), while was no difference in two groups (p>0.001). In MRI follow-up examination, the 2 cases (7.41%) of group 1 showed increased rupture lesions with improved symptoms. And the 12 cases (18.47%) of group 2 showed increased rupture lesions with improved symptoms. Retears in the group I were significant less than the group II (p<0.001). Conclusion: Comparing patients with small and medium-sized rotator cuff tear who took arthroscopic mattress locking suture repair to those who took simple suture repair after over one year follow up period, the clinical result showed no significant difference between two groups. However, Mattress Locking suture repair showed excellent radiological result compared to simple suture repair when comparing rerupture.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2004

Purpose: To compare the results of a miniopen repair with those of complete arthroscopic repair in medium and large sized full thickness rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: The thirty four(34) patients with medium and large sized complete rotator cuff tear were observed, Group I (complete arthroscopic repair) were 13 cases and group II (miniopen repair) were 21 cases. The tear sizes are from 1cm to 5cm. The average follow up periods are 24(range;12$\~$36) and 28(range; 12$\~$36) months. Subjective pain was evaluated with VAS (visual analogue scale) in rest state. ADL (Activity of Daily Living) and UCLA scoring system were used to evaluate clinical results. Results: At last follow-up periods, pain and functional scores were improved but they had not been shown statistical significance (p>0.05). In the group I and group II, there are no significant difference in VAS, ADL; UCLA score, satisfaction (p>0.05). Conclusions: In medium and large sized full thickness rotator cuff tears, there are no significant clinical results between the arthroscopic and miniopen group.