• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.107-112
• /
• 2019

Seokjeong LeeJeongzic(1841~1910) is a representing scholar in Honam Confucianism and master of three classes, caligography, painting. Seokjeong's calligraphy activities include not only creative activities, but academic activities as calligraphers and critics. Seokjeong uses Wang Hui-ji as an example of calligraphy. And if hard beauty is mastered truly and skillfully and skillfully, it reaches harmony level by itself and is Bugochangsin. Meanwhile, in "Geseokyoulsanglon5go8su" "Yeonseoksanbangmijeungsigo" there is a 5ungosi8su who criticizes Chinese calligrapheres. There are including WangHuij criticized their calligraphy by selecting 11 people in China. Also wrote reviews for "WonkyoJinjeok" "SonghaJinjeok" "ChangamSeocheub". And here, he made his own calligraphy theory by making calligraphy comments about calligraphy artists such as Wonkyo, Songha, Changam in Korea.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.32
• /
• pp.29-50
• /
• 2008

This thesis is an introduction and critique of the recently released 'Wongyo-Jinjeok(원교진적)'. 'Wongyo-Jinjeok' is the critique of Seokjeong Jeong-Jik Lee (석정 이정직, 1841-1910), a practical scientist and writer during the last years of the Korean Empire, on the calligraphy of Wongyo(원교) Gwang-Sa Lee (이광사, 1705-1777). Even though whether or not Seokjeong follows the flow of Donggukjinche(동국진체) is to be determined by the specialists in this field, this thesis is based on the view that Seokjeong was influenced by Donggukjinche. The academic value of 'Wongyo-Jinjeok' is Seokjeong's preface and epilogue which critiques Wongyo's writing. 'Wongyo-Jinjeok'is a collection of calligraphic specimens from the 18 pieces of Chinese poetry Wongyo had written before and after June 1756 which was the year after he was banished to Booryung. Seokjeong critiqued the writing of Wongyo from the perspective of calligraphic history in the preface and epilogue of 'Wongyo-Jinjeok'. Seokjeong had been positive about Wongyo's taking after the pre-Wangheejee calligraphic style. But at the same time, Seokjeong thought that Wongyo's ability to create was limited by the public morals of that time. Such thought of Seokjeong can be interpreted as an evaluation of Wongyo's calligraphy as having been externally stern but failing to transcend the realm of mastery to the realm of creation.