• Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.185-191
• /
• 2008

Today, Large and bigger underground construction are increased. In this study, Blating used electronic detonation (OBM Method) and non-electric detonation are carried out. Through comparison with two method, reduction of vibration and noise and efficiency of construction are investigated. As a result of this study, using electronic detonation is shown that it can control lower vibration and noise level, and better HCF, mucfile, advance rate and fragmentation.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.34-38
• /
• 2018

It proceed the trial test by applying blasting system with combination of electronic detonator and non-electric detonator(Supex Blasting Method) for the purpose of preventing the over-break as well as controling the blasting vibration and noisy at the site of Boseong-Imseongri railroad section ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$. As a result of that, the blasting vibration and noisy was measured within the allowable standard of vibration. In conclusion, the combination of electronic detonator and non-electric detonator can not only reduce come construction cost, level of vibration and noisy but also get the prevention effect for Public resentment and minimize the rock-damage through over break control.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.23-29
• /
• 2004

Non-electric detonator was developed to improve the blasting efficiency of electric detonator. It is increasingly utilized in surface and tunnel blasting due to its safety in external electric shock, precise delayed time, and decrease in blasting vibration and noise. The paper describes the detonating system of non-electric detonator, principle operating and planning methods, and case history so that it can be contributed to improve blasting technology.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.26-36
• /
• 2014

A survey for understanding the opinion about the safety and economy of different types of detonators used in domestic tunnel construction was carried out for total 345 people in related areas. From the result, it was found that 86.7% of the surveyed people felt non-electric detonator was safe. From the experimental points that the cost of detonators is in charge of 8.1% in overall tunnel blasting cost, and the utilization of non-electric detonators will also contribute to the prevention of blasting accidents by the electrical safety, this study can help providing opinions and basic data collected from related areas to manufacturing companies, police department, and companies ordering tunnel construction.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2003

암반발파에 사용하고 있는 전기식 뇌관과 비전기식 연결뇌관 및 번치 커넥터(Bunch connector), 점화구, 에멀젼류 폭약이 지상에서 기폭 될 때 발생하는 소음을 비교 분석하였다. 에멀젼류 폭약의 폭발소음과 화공품의 기폭소음에 대한 추정식을 도출하였다. 에멀젼류 폭약의 폭발 소음 예측은 반대수 자승근 환산식, 번치 커넥터, 전기식 뇌관 및 비전기식 연결뇌관 및 점화구는 전대수식이 적합한 것으로 판단된다. 소음원으로부터 동일한 거리에서의 소음은 점화구, 비전기식 연결뇌관, 전기식 뇌관 및 번치 커넥터 순으로 높았다. 소음원으로부터 약20∼30m거리의 범위에서 번치 커넥터의 기폭소음은 에멀젼류 폭약 0.250kg의 폭발소음보다 약15.6∼20.2dB(A) 낮고, 비전기식 연결뇌관 보다 약13.5∼16.0dB(A) 높고, 전기식 뇌관 보다는 약6.5∼7.5dB(A) 높게 됨을 알 수 있었다. 점화구는 약20m 거리에서 약 7dB(A)이하 이었다. 에멀젼류 폭약의 폭발과 번치 커넥터의 기폭소음에 미치는 주(主)소음원은 에멀젼류 폭약의 약량과 번치 커넥터의 도폭선임을 확인하였다.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.48-52
• /
• 2011

Non-electric detonator has been used in underground excavations because of its strong resistance against electric impacts. However, electric detonator is often used to initiate the non-electric detonator instead of using an exclusive non-electric blasting machine due to economical reason. Spark Trigger is introduced as a solution of unexpected explosive hazard from using an electric detonator as an initiator of non-electric system. Since Spark Trigger System does not need expensive tube and no plastic waste is left, this system is proved to be more economical and eco-friendly initiate system than the standard non-electric initiating system.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.39 no.3
• /
• pp.24-34
• /
• 2021

Electronic detonators are widely used in various construction sites due to accurate delay time. Including the cases with exceeded noise and vibration from site using electric/non-electric detonator, electronic detonators are used to improve blast fragmentation or to reduce the cost of secondary partial blasting. Furthermore, the number of cases using electronic detonators are increased for reduction of the cost and construction period by maximizing operations efficiency. This case study is about applying electronic detonators on large section station, tunnel construction site which is the part of urban area GTX A project. Although it was initially planned to utilize non-electric detonators, damage was inflicted on safety-thing. We have considered blasting method using electronic detonators as solution of this problem. By applying electronic detonators, we not only satisfied environmental regulations but also prevented nearby safety-thing from getting damaged. In addition, we were able to shorten the construction period than the initial plan by conducting single simultaneous blasting on large section station, in order to ensure safe and efficient construction.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.40 no.2
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2022

Recently, there has been an increasing number of cases of improving constructability by using electronic detonators with precise delay time in tunnel blasting sites. This case is a case of conducting test blasting using with non-electric detonator and electronic detonator at the site of 『Seoul Metropolitan Area Express Railroad Route A Private Investment Project Section 00』 that requires careful management of vibration and noise. Although this site was designed with a non-electric detonator, it was attempted to improve the advance rate and control vibration and noise by mixing the non-electric detonator and the electronic detonator due to the decrease in the advance rate. As a result of the blasting, the target value was achieved with an advance rate of about 85% and a maximum measured value of vibration and noise is 0.215cm/sec and 73.22dB(A) which were measured below regulatory standards. As blasting works in downtown areas, it is necessary to designate measurement and management objects to continuously manage vibration and noise.

• Proceedings of the KSEE Conference
• /
• 2007.03a
• /
• pp.135-141
• /
• 2007

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2004.03b
• /
• pp.433-441
• /
• 2004

국내 발파 현장에서 사용되고 있는 폭약류에 강력한 폭굉력을 충분하게 발휘하기 위해서는 뇌관(Blasting cap, Detonator)의 역할이 중요하다. 그리고 이 뇌관의 정밀성에 따라 발파 효율의 차이가 있게된다. 초기의 도화선 및 공업뇌관에서 시작하여 현재 정밀성 면에서는 MS(Milli Second)뇌관의 경우 20ms또는 25ms의 정밀한 시차로 순차적으로 기폭함으로써 발파효과의 극대화와 소음 및 진동제어에 큰 효과를 이루었으나, 최근 개발된 진자뇌관의 경우 자체 IC회로를 내징하여 $1{\sim}2ms$의 초정밀시차(오차범위 $0.1{\sim}0.2ms$이내)의 구현이 가능해짐에 따라 이를 적절히 조합하여 설계함으로써 각종 제어발파, 파쇄도 향상, 암손상영역 저감 등의 효과에 대해 국외에서 연구가 진행되고 있는 것으로 알려지고 있다. 그러나 우리나라와 같이 도심지 발파 및 터널이나 노천 현장 근거리에 보안물건이 위치해 있어 진동제어가 절실히 필요한 상황에서 진동제어에 효과가 있는 것으로 알려진 전자뇌관에 대한 연구가 이루어지고 있지 않은 상황에서 본 연구는 앞으로 이루어질 전사뇌관에 대한 수많은 연구에 기초자료를 제공하고자 실시하였다. 본 연구에서는 이를 위해 국내에서 최초로 2003년 9월 23일 강원도 양구 지역읜 00터널에 전자뇌관을 이용한 시험발파를 실시하였고, 발파에 의한 진동 등을 조사하여 그 효율성을 검토하였다. 이를 위해 전자뇌관의 특성과 장점을 최대한 살리기 위하여 각공을 발파하는 방식, 즉 1지발에 1공을 발파하는 방식을 채택하고 비전기 뇌관과 전자뇌관으로 설계를 하여 각각의 발파효율을 비교하여 보았다. 그 결과 발파신동의 경우 비전기뇌관을 이용하여 1공씩을 1지발로 발파를 한 경우에는 18${\sim}$56%의 진동저감 효과가 있었고, 번 설계에 의해 진해오딘 발파에 비하여는 최대 70% 이상의 진동저감 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.