• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2010

International construction contractors are often faced with the situation of working in an unfamiliar construction environment. Under FIDIC rules, the contractor has the right to make a claim requesting the consulting engineer for an adjustment to the contract price or the time for completion when a part or parts of the works have changed, or in the event of unforeseeable conditions. Contractors generally have more access to the costs and time implications of such a change or unforeseeable conditions than the consulting engineer or outside neutrals. Due to such an asymmetry of information, the contractor may be motivated to dispute frivolous claims of less merit, expecting erroneous judgments by the consulting engineer or the neutrals. In this paper, a claiming behavior model is presented by using game theory and experience data to study the manner in which frivolous claims develop into disputes. The model also analyzes the impacts of DAB/DRB upon the frivolous claims.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.224
• /
• pp.84-85
• /
• 2008

주거 환경에서 소음은 항상 끊이지 않는 문제다. 소음의 정도가 지나치면 참기 어려운 스트레스의 원인이 되고, 때로는 이웃 간 분쟁을 유발하기도 한다. 주택 외부에서 발생하는 소음으로 고통을 겪을 때의 법적 구제책에 대해 살펴보자.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.23-52
• /
• 2006

1997년 외환위기 이후 국내 부실기업의 해외매각을 빠른 속도로 진행하여 매각과정에서 협상력 부재로 인해 기업가치를 제대로 평가받지 못하였을 뿐만 아니라 계약조건 부분에 있어서도 협상성과는 매우 낮은 것으로 평가되고 있다. 또한, 부실한 계약조건으로 인해 계약이행이 종료되지 못하고 소송이나 중재와 같은 분쟁발생이 급격이 증가하고 있다. 이러한 문제인식 하에 본 논문은 부실기업 매각협상 사례중 국제중재와 관련된 한보철강 매각의 사례를 통해 매각시 국제중재를 통해 분쟁을 해결하는 과정을 상세하게 설명함으로써 향후 매각협상 과정뿐만 아니라 매각이후 분쟁이 실제로 발생한다면 이에 대한 정확한 대처와 중재 대처 전략을 수립할 수 있도록 하기 위함이다. 중재는 소송과 달리 단심제로서 중재기간이 상대적으로 짧다고 볼 수 있으나 단심제의 특성을 감안하여 최대한 유리한 증거와 증인확보 등 보다 더 적극적인 자세로 임해야 할 것이다. 본 사례연구에서 중요한 시사점은 국내 협상자들이 협상시 매각가격에만 중요성을 부여하며 기타 계약조건 특히, 준거법 및 관할권에 대해 소홀히 취급하는 경향이 있다는 점이다. 본 한보 중재에서도 승리의 결정적인 원인은 바로 계약서에 준거법을 한국법이라고 명시하였기 때문에 가능했던 것이다 이러한 점은 향후 국제협상시 중요하게 다루어져야 할 사항이라고 판단된다.

• The Korean Journal of Franchise Management
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.173-199
• /
• 2011

A franchisee has to depend on the overall system, such as knowhow and management support, from a franchisor in the franchise system and the two parties do not start with the same position in economic or information power because the franchisor controls or supports through selling or management styles. For this, unfair trades the franchisor's over controlling and limiting the franchisee might occur and other side effects by the people who give the franchisee scam trades has negatively influenced on the development of franchise industry and national economy. So, the purpose of this study is preventing unfair trade for the franchisee from understanding the causes and problems of dispute between the franchisor and the franchisee focused on the dispute cases submitted the Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency and seeking ways to secure the transparency of recruitment process and justice of franchise management process. The results of the case analysis are followed; first, affiliation contracts should run on the franchisor's exact public information statement and the surely understanding of the franchisee. Secondly, the franchisor needs to use their past experiences and investigated data for recruiting franchisees. Thirdly, in the case of making a contract with the franchisee, the franchisor has to make sure the business area by checking it with franchisee in person. Fourthly, the contracts are important in affiliation contracts, so enacting the possibility of disputes makes the disputes decreased. Fifthly, lots of investigation and interests are needed for protecting rights and interests between the franchisor and franchisee and preventing the disputes by catching the cause and more practical solutions of the disputes from the government.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.29 no.1 s.72
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 1999

As people are more concerned about their health and medical care, there have been an increasing number of medical disputes due to increased medical demand. In order to prevent and provide solution to currently surging medical accidents and disputes related to orthodontic treatment, in July 1998, the Korean Association Of Orthdontists surveyed 2,200 members of Korean Association of orthodontists on 30 items to recognize the pattern of medical accidents and prevent them. The survey was about accident-related items including personal profiles of members and patients who have undergone medical accidents or disputes, the cause and solution to the accidents, cautions related to members orthodontic treatment, and medical recording and archival. Based on the survey result, we analyzed characteristics of medical accidents and disputes in orthodontic area. It is more important to predict and prevent possible medical accidents or disputes based on current situation than to solve them after disputes occur. For this, we should not be negligent in raising treatment proficiency level based on patient-doctor trust and in obtaining new medical information. We should also provide medical environment where Patients themselves can decide whether to get treatment after they are offered detailed explanation on diagnosis, treatment procedure, complication, and possible hazard. We should take caution when treating patients and pay attention to charting and maintenance, which is the most fundamental, as well. Also at the Korean Association of orthodontists level, it is desired to provide education program on prevention and solution to medical accidents and disputes, and actions and organizations that can help when accidents and disputes occur.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1996.10a
• /
• pp.295-296
• /
• 1996

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.473-478
• /
• 2007

The construction industry is huge-there are lots of project organizations and many different people who work on them. Conflict will occur in any long - term relationship and it happens in personal, professional, family, and social relationships. Disputes between parties to construction projects are of great concern to the industry. The study of construction industry disputes, and the causes of those disputes, is essential. The purpose of this study is to identify the root causes of conflicts in construction industry. A questionnaire field survey was conducted to investigate the root causes of construction conflicts. The professionals working for owner, contractor and consultants were targeted for the collection of data. Descriptive analysis such as mean score and standard deviation as well as factor analysis was employed to find underlying factors related to conflicts in construction field. Student's t-test and ANOVA test tools were used to compare the perceptions of various categories of population and project. Factor analysis was used to group the numbers of conflict causes. This study reveals four root causes of construction conflict. They are: (i) weak project leadership (ii) weak contractor selection (iii) weak project management, and (iv) project participants' attitude.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.1484-1488
• /
• 2008

댐은 하천의 물을 조절하기 위해서 인공적으로 만들어진 하천구조물이다. 댐사용권은 공업화와 경제발전으로 통해 증가한 용수수요를 충족시키기 위하여 정부가 다목적댐을 건설함에 따라 추가적으로 확보되는 수량에 대한 소유권을 법적으로 인정하고 사고 팔수 있도록 하고 있다. 이는 최근 여러 가지 소모적인 물분쟁이 물분쟁의 원인이 되고 있다. 낙동강 권역의 댐들은 건설시기가 각기 다르며, 건설시의 댐계획량과 현재의 용수공급량은 기후변화와 수리환경 변화 및 용수수요의 증대로 인하여 차이를 나타내고 있다. 특히 상 하류에 건설된 댐과의 연계운영으로 이전 독립적으로 운영되었던 경우에 비해 용수공급능력이 변화할 수 있다. 그러나 이에 따른 댐의 용수공급능력을 재평가하기 위한 공식적인 방법이나 절차가 정립되어 있지 않아 댐 건설시의 계획량을 적용하고 있는 실정이다. 가용허가수량에 대한 재평가가 없이 수리권에 대한 갱신이 이루어질 경우 사용자 입장에서는 자신의 용수사용을 개선할 원인을 제공하지 못할 것이며, 임의적인 허가가 계속 부여될 경우, 갈수시 물공급의 안정성을 확보할 수 없게 될 것이다. 따라서 안정적인 용수의 공급을 위한 적절한 가용허가수량을 판단하는 것이 요구된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 실제 낙동강권역 댐의 여러 가지 여건을 고려하여 21세기 프론티어연구개발사업 "유역통합물수지분석 및 수자원계획기술 개발"에서 활용된 통합수자원평가계획 모형 K-WEAP에 적용하였다. 이를 통하여 낙동강권역 댐의 가용허가수량을 분석하고, 현재 산정되어 있는 댐의 가용허가수량과 비교 분석하였다.

• (The) Research of the performance art and culture
• /
• no.43
• /
• pp.405-440
• /
• 2021

The members of the holding group 'YangjuByeolsandae-nori' (National Important Intangible Cultural Heritage) were divided into two groups in 2010. This means that the internal groupwhich has been going on since the previous period exploded. The subject of the researchis to deal with thedisruption. The first purpose of the research is to record the cause·deployment·ending of the 'YangjuByeolsandaeTalnori'. The second purpose of the research is to reviewthe appropriateness of the administrative measures taken by the Cultural Heritage Administrationin intervention. The thirdpurpose of the research the Cultural Heritage Administration's contribution to the establishment of principles to cope with group disruption. The fourth purpose of the researchis to serve as a reference to the resolution of the disruption of other preservation groups. The result of the research suggests that the administration should recognize that the conflict of the ownership over the group must be resolved in order to boost the overall success of the project, and must establish and respond to the principles. The content is a reconstruction of the explanation. To deal with divisions is also considered to be a field of study. The research which deals directly with the main researcher's problems is put forward in hopes of contributing to the study and contributing to society.

• The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.1109-1115
• /
• 2012

The housing redevelopment goes on smoothly, because it has problem that prevent theory and alternative policy. The conflict factors may remove to the problem before. This study has proposed that is universally applicable to the housing redevelopment and the conflict factors was supplied effective use of resources. This paper get the conclusion as a survey. first, It have a conflict solution for successful housing redevelopment business. Second, reconstruction business process categorized four stage. Third, It suggest an alternative about reconstruction business manage and systematization.