• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.141-159
• /
• 2005

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1996.04a
• /
• pp.187-193
• /
• 1996

• 가정의 벗
• /
• v.36 no.1 s.413
• /
• pp.16-17
• /
• 2003

• 가정의 벗
• /
• v.36 no.8 s.420
• /
• pp.35-35
• /
• 2003

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.39
• /
• pp.74-102
• /
• 1999

The integrated global economic system have intensed Liberalization, dereguration, privatization. National states were subordinated in global economic system. To save social costs and to encourage the national competition power, the globalized market tends to reduce the domestic social expention. Truely anxious things are not the defectiveness of capitalism itself but neo-liberal measures of each national states. So neo-liberal globalization beat welfare states. Welfare and growth, accumulation and justice are inter-conflict elements, and these confliction is well explained in context of globalization. Stratigies of growth pursuing economic benefits subordinate social policy in economic policy. Globalization did not always reduce the power of national state, but each national states purposely reduce the power of state and state participations. Thus Globalization can be overcome and must be overcome, eventually, the history of social welfare in korea differ frome that of European states. Their's social welfare retrenchment have based on the excessly expeneded welfare provision, but the frame of social welfare in korea is not yet established in history. Fundamentally historic experiences between European and korean social welfare are different. So "the third way" in korea must be in carefull approaches and the social welfare policy in korea must purchase "anti-market policy" and the equal distribution.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.57 no.1
• /
• pp.245-269
• /
• 2005

This paper purports to evaluate the public assistance programme of Korea in comparison with those of member states of the European Union, using the concept of poverty regime as a heuristic device. For this purpose, chapter two discusses notions of welfare-state regime (Esping-Andersen, 1990) and poverty regime(Sainsbury and Morissen, 2002). Chapter three examines poverty and income distribution in Korea and the member states of the EU, and chapter four compares and analyses the public assistance programme of those countries, using hierarchical cluster analysis. It claims that the 'welfare paradox' of $L{\empty}delmel$ (1997) is not based on evidence, and duly concludes that the overall level of welfare effort such as welfare expenditure is a main determinant for the development of public assistance programmes.

• 재활복지
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.27-51
• /
• 2013

The present study aims to examine the assistive technology service operation system[ATSOS] of the support system for independent living[SSIL] which was introduced after the enactment of the Law of Assisting the Independence for Persons with Disabilities[LAIPD] and to discuss its implications in the development of the assistive technology service delivery system[ATSDS] and the related measures for promoting the assistive technology industry in Korea. For this purpose, the literature review and the field study were employed. The research findings showed that the Japanese SSIL, which adopted the user payment system as measures to establish the sustainable ATSOS, arranged the consumer participation structure through substantial cooperation among related government departments. The result of this study indicates the need to secure the consumer's right to choose in a comprehensive utilization process of assistive technology services as for the establishment of the ATSDS in Korea. Furthermore, the arrangements for practical cooperative strategies among related government departments are encouraged.

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.56 no.7
• /
• pp.152-156
• /
• 2024

육계는 '살코기를 위해 기르는 닭'을 말한다. 우리나라도 2014년부터 육계 농장의 동물복지 인증제를 시행하고 있다. 우리 제도는 닭의 사육밀도, 먹이와 물 공급 시설, 휴식 공간 등의 기준을 정해놓았지만, 해외에서는 닭의 품종까지도 고려하고 있다. 빨리 자라는 육계는 다리에 힘이 약하거나 발바닥 피부염 등의 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 그래서 육계 동물복지를 위해 천천히 자라는 품종을 기르자는 의견도 있지만 천천히 자라는 품종은 생산비가 많이 들기 때문에 농장에서 쉽게 받아들이기 어려운 실정이다. 최근 외국의 한 연구팀이 기존의 빨리 자라는 육계 품종을 이용해 사료 급여량과 사육밀도를 조절하여 천천히 자라게 한 뒤, 닭의 복지와 행동을 살펴보았다. 사료를 적게 주고 사육밀도를 낮추면 닭이 천천히 자랐고, 깃털 상태, 활동성, 발바닥의 건강상태는 좋아졌지만, 사료 효율은 낮아지고 원하는 무게에 도달하는 데 더 오랜 시간이 걸렸다. 이 연구를 통해 닭의 복지를 위해서는 성장률과 사육밀도를 잘 조절해야 한다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 향후 육계 농장은 생산성과 동물복지를 함께 고려해야 하는데, 이번 연구 결과는 앞으로 더 나은 육계 농장이 되기 위해, 우리가 풀어야 할 문제를 엿볼 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.42 no.2 s.119
• /
• pp.177-195
• /
• 2007

The central aim of this paper is to identify the distributional pattern of poverty and to investigate the spatial relationship between poverty and welfare service providers in Busan, Korea. It is intended to explain how the relationship of service-dependency between impoverished people and social welfare services leads to uneven social geography. Welfare services controlled by public or private agencies may support the impoverished people in different ways, generating social outcomes. By exploiting the spatial variations in the incidence of poverty and the provisions of social welfare services, this paper is to understand the dynamics of the geography of poverty from a local scale so that it can help us understand how various governmental and nongovernmental area-based service providers are spatially uneven when they are compared to the distribution of service dependency group such as impoverished people. From this research, it is finally argued that the implications of locational interdependence between such needed groups and social welfare services for their support demand a paradigm for urban social geography that centers on the changing welfare provision structure and the linkages between population and service-provision.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.69 no.4
• /
• pp.9-33
• /
• 2017

This study aims to emphasize the importance of social inclusiveness for evaluation and future development of social policy in Korea. In particular, this study emphasizes that the future of social policy in Korea depends on the level of social inclusiveness. Social inclusiveness can be measured by the extent to which social policy is inclusive and the level of citizens' perception of social inclusiveness. This study uses 4 frameworks (universality, progressiveness, life-long, and adequacy) of inclusive asset-based policy to evaluate the level of social inclusiveness of key laws and social policies. Key findings are as follows: First, Korea has established normative systems of laws and social policies. Second, however, Korean social policy has multiple problems in universality, progressiveness, life-long, and adequacy. To enhance social inclusiveness of social policy, this study emphasizes the 'socialness' of social problems. Korea has faced market failure, the high level of rate experiencing poverty during life, and inefficiency of social policy. If we accept the socialness of social problems, social policy should attempt to increase publicness of social policy. The increase in socialness as well as social inclusiveness may be fundamental for inclusive society in Korea.