• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.10 s.116
• /
• pp.64-65
• /
• 1988

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.5 s.111
• /
• pp.58-59
• /
• 1988

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.11 s.105
• /
• pp.36-46
• /
• 1987

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.4 s.110
• /
• pp.58-59
• /
• 1988

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.8 s.114
• /
• pp.68-75
• /
• 1988

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.8 s.66
• /
• pp.48-59
• /
• 1984

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.12 s.298
• /
• pp.10-15
• /
• 2003

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.2 s.120
• /
• pp.72-73
• /
• 1989

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.1 s.179
• /
• pp.38-51
• /
• 1994

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.16 no.12
• /
• pp.8378-8385
• /
• 2015

The interest of global competitiveness for national defense industry. This study analyzes the efficiency and productivity of 45 defense companies in each continent(North America, Europe and Northeast Asia, etc.), including Korea defense companies. It is analyzed by Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) and Malmquist Productivity Analysis over the period 2009-2013(5 years). The sample companies has been selected on the data avilability among the SIPRI Top 100 arms-producing and military services companies in the world(excluding China) in 2013. It extracts the relative efficiency and Malmquist productivity index of companies and each continent. Based on the DEA and MPI results, this paper estimates the global competitiveness and position of national defense industry and extracts implication. This study can be utilized for improvement of national defense industry and policy planning for cultivating the national defense companies.