• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.18-32
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 IT 기업의 R&D활동의 성과를 파악하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 공공 R&D의 성과에 대한 연구는 상당부분 진척이 이루어졌으나, 경제의 주체인 민간기업의 R&D 활동에 대한 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 이 연구목적을 위하여, 기업의 재무자료를 이용하여 R&D투자액을 집계하였으며, IT기업의 경영성과도 분석하였다. 분석한 결과를 간단하게 요약하면, 다음과 같다. 첫째, IT기업은 대기업의 R&D투자 비중이 $93.6\%$에 달한다. IT R&D 투자 상위 10개 기업이 IT 산업에서 매출액의 $71\%$, 종업원의 $61\%,$ R&D 투자의 $87\%$를 차지한다. 둘째, 기업의 투자활동은 선택과 집중의 원칙에 따라 R&D 투자에 주력하는 경향이 강해졌다. 유형자산투자는 급격한 감소를 보이는 반면, R&D투자는 증가하고 있다. 셋째, IT 중소기업의 R&D투자는 한계가 있을 수밖에 없다. 본 연구에서 나타난 분석결과의 시사점을 보면, IT 중소기업의 R&D 투자는 한계가 있을 수밖에 없다. 따라서 중소기업의 R&D투자의 효율성을 높여주는 한편, 미래성장의 seed에 대한 준비와 단기 개발연구를 통해 기업의 수익에 기여할 수 있도록 해야 할 것이다. 또한 IT 대기업과 중소기업의 R&D에 대한 효율적인 네트워크를 구축하는 것도 IT기업의 활성화를 위해 요구된다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.403-408
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.513-514
• /
• 2017

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.153-180
• /
• 2020

This study is meaningful in finding out what legal and policy issues need to be improved in order to foster the aircraft industry, which is relatively underdeveloped compared to the fact that some heavy industries, such as the automobile industry and shipbuilding industry, have achieved a high level of production and technology globally. Korea's aircraft industry has been growing at a slower pace than other industries, largely due to the country's economic growth and the lack of a market structure to properly use variables such as the level of development in related industries, aircraft technology and demand for aircraft manufacturing. While most industries are privately led by the market structure of the competition system, heavy industries such as the aircraft industry generally grow under the market structure of the incomplete competition system, because only by securing huge initial investment costs, high technology, and sufficient demand, they can maintain minimum economic feasibility. The Korean aircraft industry was focused on developing and mass-producing military aircraft focusing on military demand, but it sought to turn the tide by signing the BASA (Bileral Aviation Safety Agreement) with the U.S. A preliminary feasibility study was conducted in 2010 to develop next-generation medium-sized aircraft, but was cancelled due to differences in position with Canada's Bombardier, which is subject to the concourse, and Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) is pushing for the production of Bombardier's Q400 license on its own. Compared to the mid-to-large sized civil aircraft that are facing difficulties in development, KAI and KARI are successfully developing technologies to unmanned aerial vehicles and civil helicopters. In addition, the unmanned aerial vehicle sector is not yet suitable for manufacturers that have an exclusive global influence, so we believe that it is necessary to pursue government-led research and development projects with a focus on the areas of commercial helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles in order to foster the aircraft industry in the future. In addition, since military aircraft such as KT-1 and T-50 are currently being exported smoothly, and it cannot be overlooked that the biggest demand for aircraft manufacturing in the Korea is the military, it is necessary to push forward national R&D projects and defense R&D program simultaneously to enable both civilian-military development. However, there are many differences between the two projects in the way they are implemented, the department in charge and the royalty system. Through this study, we learned about the technology ownership and implementation rights of national R&D projects and defense R&D programs, as well as the royalty system. In addition, problems with the system were identified and improvement measures were derived.

• Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
• /
• v.46 no.2
• /
• pp.116-132
• /
• 2023

Technology innovation companies are focusing on contributing to business performance by R&D project as a strategic tool. Successful R&D leads to corporate competitiveness enhancement, national industrial development, but there are high uncertainty and risks in R&D. Public and private R&D projects are carried out to achieve various purposes. It was verified how the risk management and benefit management of the R&D project affect the detailed R&D project performance between the Public and private domain. The impact of Project Leadership on R&D performance was also analyzed. Those who have participated in the Public and Private R&D projects at companies or research institutes were surveyed. First, it was found that project risk and benefit management have partially an effect on R&D project performance. Second, Public and private R&D Project Leadership showed partially a interaction effect between project management and project performance.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.1401-1413
• /
• 2017

신약개발은 많은 투자비와 시간이 필요하면서도 성공률이 낮아 위험성이 높은 분야로, 국내 제약 기업의 투자 역량과 인력이 부족하여 민간 R&D 투자만으로는 한계가 있다. 현재 바이오 분야 중 신약 분야에 가장 많은 정부 R&D 예산이 투입되고 있으나, 특정 단계가 아닌 신약 개발 단계 전주기에 걸쳐 지원하고 있기 때문에 투입 예산을 효율적으로 활용하여 성과를 창출하기 위해서는 투자 현황에 대한 분석이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 정부 R&D 사업 중 신약개발 과제를 대상으로 신약개발 단계, 의약품 종류, 대상 질환을 기준으로 정부 R&D 투자 현황을 분석하고자 한다. 이는 향후 신약 분야의 경제적 성과 창출을 위한 정부의 투자 방향과 전략 수립에 활용 가능할 것이다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2007

Among numerous policy influencers' and researchers' advices and policy suggestions, there is little opposition to the proposition that technology is essential to the economic development. The role of technology has never been more emphasized than today in Korea as in any other countries. The effects of the government's innovation policy on corporate R&D activities and more broadly the economic welfare of a whole nation are widely recognized with intuitional and empirical evidence. That is, various R&D incentives reduce the marginal cost of a firm's R&D efforts, inducing as much increase of its R&D investment to result in a better chance to acquire target technology. This paper examines the impact of R&D incentives on the technological outcomes by analyzing individual firms' investment behaviors subject to the government's R&D incentive policies. An econometric model of technological outcomes is estimated on a project level with cross-sectional data. "Probit model" is employed for estimations. Special attention was given to the effectiveness of R&D programs by estimating policy impact by types of investment. The data were collected from 928 different R&D projects completed between 1987 and 1993. With the single equation approach, we were able to find that the structure of investment is a far more significant factor in technological outcomes than the total amount of investment. The analysis also shows that the two types of firms' matching investment, in-kind and cash, do not bear a complementary, but a substitutive relations to each other. It also reconfirms the proposition that R&D incentives increase firm's financial investment. Despite many supportive studies emphasizing the cooperation between innovation performers, it is also found that the larger the number of institutions involved in a project, the less likely it leads to a technological success, And meeting the proposed deadlines without postponing is estimated to be a good barometer to predict the outcome of an R&D project. Also the probabilities of success for major variables are represented for policy implications, after calculating marginal effects.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.788-818
• /
• 2009

Renewable energy refers to solar energy, biomass energy, hydrogen energy, wind power, fuel cell, coal liquefaction and vaporization, marine energy, waste energy, and liquidity fuel made out of byproduct of geothermal heat, hydrogen and coal; it excludes energy based on coal, oil, nuclear energy and natural gas. Developed countries have recognized the importance of these energies and thus have set the mid to long term plans to develop and commercialize the technology and supported them with drastic political and financial measures. Considering the growing recognition to the field, it is necessary to analysis up-to-now achievement of the government's related projects, in the standards of type of renewable energy, management of sectional goals, and its commercialization. Korean government is chiefly following suit the USA and British policies of developing and distributing renewable energy. However, unlike Japan which is in the lead role in solar rays industry, it still lacks in state-directed support, participation of enterprises and social recognition. The research regarding renewable energy has mainly examinedthe state of supply of each technology and suitability of specific region for applying the technology. The evaluation shows that the research has been focused on supply and demand of renewable as well as general energy and solution for the enhancement of supply capacity in certain area. However, in-depth study for commercialization and the increase of capacity in industry followed by development of the technology is still inadequate. 'Cost-benefit model for each energy source' is used in analysis of technology development of renewable energy and quantitative and macro economical effects of its commercialization in order to foresee following expand in related industries and increase in added value. First, Investment on the renewable energy technology development is in direct proportion both to the product and growth, but product shows slightly higher index under the same amount of R&D investment than growth. It indicates that advance in technology greatly influences the final product, the energy growth. Moreover, while R&D investment on renewable energy product as well as the government funds included in the investment have proportionate influence on the renewable energy growth, private investment in the total amount invested has reciprocal influence. This statistic shows that research and development is mainly driven by government funds rather than private investment. Finally, while R&D investment on renewable energy growth affects proportionately, government funds and private investment shows no direct relations, which indicates that the effects of research and development on renewable energy do not affect government funds or private investment. All of the results signify that although it is important to have government policy in technology development and commercialization, private investment and active participation of enterprises are the key to the success in the industry.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.121-128
• /
• 2003

The paper analysed R&D budget expenditure behaviors of those projects supported under the Industrial IT R&B Program in 2001 and found out relationship between evaluation scores of each project and its expenditure behavior. The study shows significant differences in expenditure behavior between project groups with higher scores and with lower ones. Based on the findings, the paper raises a few suggestions on program management techniques to increase outcome of the program.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2015.11a
• /
• pp.884-906
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 공공연구기관의 기술이전 효율성을 분석하기 위해 효율성 분석기법인 DEA를 활용하였다. 투입요소로 연구비, 연구인력, TLO 인력, TLO 운영비 네 가지를, 산출요소로 기술이전 계약건수, 기술이전 수입료 두 가지를 선정하여 기술이전 효율성을 산출하였다. 기술이전 효율성에 영향을 미치는 변수로 지역적 위치, 연구기관 유형, 민간부문 연구개발비 비중, 인센티브 제도 등을 고려하여 산출된 효율성을 비교하였다. 본 연구의 분석을 통해 다음의 4가지 시사점을 도출하였다. 첫째, 연구기관 지방이전 시 먼저 인프라를 구축하고 산학연협력이 제대로 이뤄질 수 있는 환경을 조성해야 한다는 것이다. 둘째, 연구기관별로 설립 목적에 맞는 R&D를 수행할 수 있도록 해야 한다. 셋째, 민간수탁 증대가 R&D 효율성(기술이전 효율성)과 직접적으로 연결이 될 거라는 단편적인 생각은 버리고 폭넓은 의견수렴과 심층적 조사가 필요하다. 넷째, 인센티브 제도나 규정을 운영함에 있어 TLO 인력에게 직접적인 동기요인으로 작용할 수 있는 장치를 만들어야 한다. 본 연구의 분석을 통해 정부 연구기관들의 기술이전 효율성에 대한 이해를 높이고, 도출된 시사점을 바탕으로 국가 R&D 체계를 개선하는데 유의미한 정책의 개발이 있을 것으로 기대한다. 또한 공공연구기관의 기술이전에 대한 관심과 논의가 확대되고, 향후 축적될 자료를 활용한 정교한 연구가 활발히 이어지기를 희망한다.