• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.32
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2008

Mi-Am Yu hi-chun(眉巖 柳希春, 1513~1577) was one of the Honam Sarim(湖南士林) with Ha-Sue Kim In-Hoo(하서 김인후) and Go-Bong Ki Dae-Seuing(고봉 기대승) in 16C. But He was condemned to exile and spend 19 years in Jong-Sung, with enthronement of King Sun-jo, was appointed as a gyeong'yeongwan(經筵官), one of the Eulsa sarim(乙巳士林). And at that time, he publicated Jujaeoryu munjip juhae(주자어류문집주해), which is a match for Toegye(퇴계). But due to the shortage of existing work, the study of his learning was not accomplish in depth. Then this article made clear his learning with Mi-Am ilgi (미암일기), which was written for ten years before he die. But a period of yubae literature did not studied. This article present this matter and established the feature.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.57
• /
• pp.383-406
• /
• 2014

Mi-Am Yu Hee Choon (1513~1577) considered poetry as a part of his life. Therefore, this writer specifically focused on Mi-Am Yu Hee Choon's Chinese poems. The following is the conclusion from the materials discussed in this article. Mi-Am tried to understand literature in ethical perspective. The number of Chinese poems composed by Mi-Am is estimated to be about 300, and the number of pieces that this writer could find was 285. Also, Mi-Am took poem composition seriously, and put emphasis on content more than structure. Among Go Shi, Yul Shi, and Jul gu, Jul gu (especially Chil Un) is the largest in quantity, and it is presumed that he preferred Chil(seven) Un over Oh(five) Un. With regards to Go Shi, there are relatively many Jeon-Go. With regards to Jul gu, which was a poetry composing structure that Mi-Am could make the best use of, they were mostly about the daily lives. And with regards to Yul Shi, there were many poems that expressed his feelings about the real world and self-examination. Mi-Am's poems can be categorized into ones that he wrote when he was on exile, and ones that he wrote while serving for the king again after he got released from exile. During the exile period, self-discipline through learning, friendship, and love for the people were the main themes of his poems, and after being released and started serving for the king again, his poems were mostly about loyalty to the king, interaction with acquaintances, emotions, ancestor worship, self-examination, and conjugal affection through literary communion. Among Mi-Am's poems, there are many that have Eum Song Cha Un included in their titles, and the mainstream of his poems were related to daily lives or experiences. Also, most of them naturally and calmly expressed the fact itself without exaggerating. Mi-Am considered poetry as a part of his life and the fact that he practiced literary communion with his wife by writing poems about the ordinary things happened between him and his wife, Song Duk Bong, is worthy of notice.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.277-295
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to identify woodblocks which were engraved in the providences in the mid Chosun dynasty, especially ones engraved under the auspices of Yu Heui-chun(柳希春), but not listed in $\boxDr$Kosachwalyo 攷事撮要$\boxUl$. This could be done by the analyzing $\boxDr$The Diary of Miam 眉巖日記$\boxUl$ written by Yu Heui-chun. It is a book which recorded daily life of eminent scholar and official covering political, social and cultural aspects, books and family matters. There were two categories of books published under the auspices of Yu Heui-chun. One is the books written by his grandfather in law, Choi Bu(崔溥), which were $\boxDr$Keumnamjip 錦南集$\boxUl$ collective works of Choi Bu, and $\boxDr$Pyohaerog 漂海錄$\boxUl$, essays on travelling across China. The other is the books for children, $\boxDr$Sinjeung Yuhap 新增類合$\boxUl$ for teaching characters and $\boxDr$Sog Mong-gu 續蒙求$\boxUl$ for moral education. These woodblocks have to enlisted in the woodblock catalogs. The analysis shows that most of these woodblocks by Yu Heui-chun were not recorded in either of two $\boxDr$Kosachwalyo 攷事撮要$\boxUl$ editions published in 1575 and 1585. In this respect, $\boxDr$The Diary of Miam$\boxUl$ proved itself to be of great significance in terms of bibliography studies.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.48
• /
• pp.147-167
• /
• 2012

This paper was investigated by comparing "Sok-Mong-Gu Bun-Ju"(續蒙求分註) and "Mong-Gu"(蒙求). As a result, "Mong-Gu" was organized around the person anecdotes, "Sok-Mong-Gu Bun-Ju" is annotated with the person anecdotes. So the text show an differences were found on the configuration. Thus It reveal that "Sok-Mong-Gu Bun-Ju" is a tome and convenient to use the report has been made by scholars can be clarified.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.56
• /
• pp.241-265
• /
• 2014

This paper looked at the existing situation and the uniqueness of the Hasu(河西) kim Inhu(金麟厚)'s collection of works. As a result, The first edition includes a piece missing in the second edition. For the title of the same work, the second edition differs from the third edition. And in the third edition, The missing piece is found through the annual report. This research found the performance that were found missing pieces. But I did not review for that depth meaning, and postpone it to a later date.