• Title/Summary/Keyword: 무역 관련 지식재산권 협정

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

광산업 분야 특허권 인식 저조 - 지식재산권 적극적인 확보 필요

  • 김기효
    • The Optical Journal
    • /
    • v.11 no.6 s.64
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 1999
  • 1994년 채택된 무역관련 지식재산권협정은 후발개도국도 발명자의 권리 보호에 중점을 두는 특허제도를 채택하도록 해 기술료가 급격히 인상했으며 특허 침해관련 소송도 급증하고 있다. 이 가운데 1998년에 우리 나라 사진기, 복사기 분야의 출원을 살펴보면 외국인 출원비중이 41$\%$로 전 분야 외국인 출원비중의 2배 수준이다. 외국기술 의존도가 높은 데다 특허권에 대한 인식이 저조한 것은 심각하게 우려해야 할 상황이다.

  • PDF

Postcolonial Media Piracy Studies and Intellectual Property Regime as Global Control System

  • Yoon, Sangkil;Kim, Sanghyun
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.27 no.9
    • /
    • pp.91-100
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to critically review the global intellectual property regime, which has been in full swing since the mid-1990s, from the perspective of postcolonialism. More specifically, by looking at issues which were raised by the Postcolonial Piracy Studies, it attempted to relativize the global IP system. This paper confirmed the postcolonialist view that universal concepts could never be completely universal or pure, and confirmed the non-state legalities view of media piracy as a conduit for participation in the global network through 'porous legalities' concept of Lawrence Liang. Finally, this paper raised the need to understand various relationships between the informal media economy and the formal media economy in a balanced perspective, rather than relying only on the neat dichotomy logic of illegality/legal.

Measures of International Standardization in Korean Landscape Drawing Practice (한국 조경제도의 국제표준화 방안)

  • Kim, Min-Soo
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.37 no.4
    • /
    • pp.52-63
    • /
    • 2009
  • WTO/TBT aims to reduce impediments to trade resulting from differences between national regulations and standards. Where international standards exist or their completion is imminent, the Code of Good Practice says that standardizing bodies should use them, or the relevant parts of them, as a basis for any standards they develop. Drawing is a formal and precise way of communicating information about the shape, size and, features. In addition, drawing is a part of the universal language of engineering. However there are many differences between international landscape drawing standard ISO 11091 and Korean landscape drawing practice(KLDP). The result of a comparison of ISO 11091 with KLDP and suggestions for international standardization of KLDP are summarized as follows. First, Among the 33 kinds of conventions from ISO 11091, 2 similar kinds and 15 different kinds from KLDP and 16 kinds of conventions which exist only in ISO 11091 appeared-for the international standardization of KLDP, it is necessary to make an extensive alteration of KLDP. Second, Europe Unity countries accepted ISO 11091 and are using it as their national standard for landscape drawing. Even Japan has accepted ISO 11091 on their civil engineering drawings and is using it as their national standard. Therefore, we need to hasten KS standard enactment based on ISO 1091. Third, For the KS standard of construction drawings, the degree of international standardization is rising even though there are still differences from the ISO standard. Therefore, since the burden on the international standardization of KLDP is expected to be weighed, preparations should be quickly brought about in the practice fields. Fourth, Since in the landscape planting ordinances of local independent governments is the standard presented by categorizing trees into evergreen and deciduous, such parts should be modified and introduced when enacting the KS standard based on ISO 11091. Fifth, For the enactment of the KS standard for landscape drawings, a wide range of opinions should be collected by the relevant landscape organization by installing a committee, and based on its recommendation, an application for the KS standard enactment of landscape drawing should be made to the chief of Ministry of Knowledge Economy.