• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to formulate an evaluation model and to select evaluation factors for designing scenic roads and designating existing roads as scenic roads. The definition of a "scenic road" contains the purpose not just of travel or access but visiting itself. The value of a scenic road can be enhanced through the preservation of natural environment along the road or the installation of artificial facilities. In order to promote objective scenic road selection and evaluation, the authors used Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a multi-criteria decision making method. The weighting value was 0.382 for the value of landscape along the road, 0.154 for the value of landscape in the road, 0.269 for the characteristics of the road, and 0.196 for the management of the road.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.50-50
• /
• 2017

도시홍수의 잠재적 위험은 홍수경감계획이 발전됨에 따라 감소하지만, 침수피해 가능성은 도시화와 도시 확장에 따라 증가한다. 침수피해 가능성에 대한 사전 파악 및 위험도 분석은 대규모 침수재해 발생 시의 위기관리에도 도움을 준다. 또한, 경제적 피해에 대한 예측은 재해발생 후 복구 및 복원 작업에 필요한 자원 할당에 매우 유용하며, 잠재적 홍수 피해에 대한 예측은 장기적인 홍수경감계획과 재해관리에 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 다차원 침수해석 모형의 결과로 산정 가능한 침수심, 유속 등의 지표들을 복합적으로 고려하여 침수위험도를 산정하고, 침수 발생 위험이 있는 지역의 인문 사회 경제적 지표를 통해 피해 저감 및 복구성을 반영하기 위한 재해 취약인자를 선정하여 해당 지역에 대한 취약도를 산정하였다. 또한, 분석된 위험도와 취약도의 연산으로 통합리스크 분석을 실시하여 침수 발생 시 해당지역에 대한 피해 예상과 지역별 상대평가가 가능하도록 하였다. 위험도와 취약도 및 리스크 분석은 다양한 인자를 동시에 고려하기 위해 여러 개의 기준에 대한 선호도를 결정하거나 최적 대안을 선택하는 다기준의사결정(MCDM)기법을 적용하였으며, MCDM기법 중 보편적으로 많이 이용되는 TOPSIS기법을 적용하였다. 이러한 리스크 분석은 우리나라 전체, 특정 시도, 시군구, 읍면동 간의 침수피해와 관련한 상대적 비교 평가가 가능하며, 대응 및 대비의 관점에서 저감 대책 수립의 우선 지역을 도출하는 데 활용될 수 있을 것이며, 침수피해 발생 후, 리스크가 큰 지역에 대해 우선적으로 복구 조치가 이뤄질 수 있을 것이다. 또한, 한정된 지자체 예산 안에서 도시홍수 피해 경감 대책 수립을 위한 의사결정에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.1545-1549
• /
• 2008

최근 이상홍수나 가뭄과 같은 물 관련 재해의 발생빈도가 높아지고, 산업 고도화, 인구증가와 같은 원인에 의해 장 단기적 물 부족 현상이 우려되면서 수자원 사업에 대한 관심이 고조되고 있다. 대부분의 수자원 사업은 공공성이 매우 크기 때문에 대규모 정부예산의 투입을 필요로 하고 있으나, 수자원사업의 특성상 사업의 공공성에 반하여 사업 시행에 따른 여러 경제적, 정책적 이해관계가 난립하여 사업 시행에 어려움이 따르고 있는 것이 실정이다. 이에 따라 '수자원(댐)부문사업의 예비타당성조사 표준지침 연구-제3판'에서는 수자원 사업의 타당성 평가를 위해 크게 경제성분석과 정책적분석의 두 부문으로 접근하고 있으며, 최종적으로 다기준의사결정기법 중 하나인 AHP기법을 이용하여 결정함으로써 수자원 사업의 가치 평가에 대한 이해를 돕고 있다. 본 연구에서는 지난 1999년부터 2006년까지 수행된 수자원분야 및 타분야의 사례를 바탕으로 수자원사업 예비타당성조사의 실태를 파악함으로써 현재 지적되고 있는 문제점을 고찰하고 그에 따른 해결방향을 제시하고자 하였다.

• The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2013

Roundabouts are recently paid a lot of attention, but in the process of implementation, there are insufficient logical grounds for clear criteria and priority of introduction. As a result, in determining priority of introduction of roundabouts, a local government often depends on a policy maker's subjective judgement. Therefore, this study was conducted to suggest methodology for priority decision of introduction of roundabouts. Assessment elements of six main elements including accident type at intersections and each one has three subelements. Survey was carried out targeting fifty-three public officials in charge and experts in order to analyze the significance of each assessment element. The theoretical background of analysis is based on AHP developed by Saaty, which is one of multiple criteria decision making methods. 'Expert Choice 2000' was used as a software program. Five intersections representing different situations were selected as examples of analysis. It was also paired with sensibility analysis to grasp how priority might be changed by different weight. Through this result, it can be inferred that priority might change by manipulating field situation from other areas.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.93-106
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to find the method of spatial analysis using GIS that would best reflect the characteristics of study area. The purpose was successfully achieved. In order to carry out multicriteria decision analysis of the study results, the spatial analysis process reflecting the characteristics of study area was examined through stages of evaluation criteria standardization and evaluation indicator weighting decision. In the stage of evaluation criteria standardization, the characteristics of study area could be reflected through the adjustment of critical when converting a real value to a general value. In the stage of evaluation indicator weighting determination, the characteristics of the study area were reflected using the present condition of land use. The results of evaluating the grades of development-potential regions by reflecting characteristics of study area showed high correlativity between already developed region and new developing region. Such results show that, in spatial analysis, by combining expert questionnaire survey and literature survey, this method which reflects the characteristics of an area is very reasonable.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.43 no.3
• /
• pp.381-395
• /
• 2023

This paper presents a GIS-based site suitability analysis for a smart hydrogen energy plant in the Gangwon-Do region, South Korea. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was implemented in this study to identify the most suitable sites for the development of smart hydrogen energy plants. The study utilizes various spatial data layers, including hydrogen generation potential and climatic conditions, environmental and topographic conditions, and natural catastrophic conditions, to evaluate the suitability of potential sites for the hydrogen energy plant. The spatial data layers were then used to rank and prioritize the sites based on suitability. The findings revealed that 4.26% of the study area, or 712.14 km², was suitable for constructing smart hydrogen energy plants. Some regions of Cheorwon-gun, Chuncheon-si, Wonju-si, Yanggu-gun, Gangneung-si, Hoengseong-gun, and near the coastal region along the east coast were found to be suitable for solar and wind energy utilization. The proposed MCDA provides a valuable tool for decision-makers and stakeholders to make informed decisions on the location of smart hydrogen energy plants and supports the transition to a sustainable and low-carbon energy system. Decision-makers can use the results of this study to select suitable sites for constructing smart hydrogen energy plants.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.20 no.7
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2002

Transportation project appraisal should be precise in order to increase the social welfare and efficiency, and it has been evaluated by only a single criterion analysis such as benefit/cost analysis. However, this method cannot assess some qualitative items, and cannot get a proper solution for the clash of interests among various groups. Therefore, the multi-criteria analysis, which can control these problems, is needed, and then Saaty has developed one of these methods, AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. In AHP, the project is evaluated through weighted score of the criteria and the alternatives, which is surveyed by a questionnaire of specialists. It is based on some strict suppositions such as reciprocal comparison, homogeneity, expectation, independence relationship between multi-criteria, but supposing that each criterion has independence relation with others is too difficult in two reasons. First, in real situation, there cannot be perfect independence relationship between standards. Second, individuals, even though they are specialists of that area, do not feel the degree of independence relation as same as others. This paper develops a modified AHP method for solving this dependence relationship between multi-criteria. First of all. in this method, the degree of dependence relationship between multi-criteria that the specialist feels is surveyed and included to the weighted score of multi-criteria This study supposes three methods to implement this idea. The first model products the degree of dependence relationship in the first step for calculating the weighted score, and the others adjust the result of weighted score from the basic AHP method to the dependence relationship. One of the second methods distributes the cross weighted score to each standard by constant ratio, and the other splits them using Fuzzy measure such as Bel and Pl. Finally, in order to validate these methods, this paper applies them to evaluate the alternatives which can control public resentments against Korean rail path in a city area.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.63-82
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of current rules and regulations on the source selection for weapon system in defense acquisition project and suggest several techniques to ensure objectivity and fairness. As an application example, Helicopter source selection was presented. It was analyzed and compared through technique application and strength and weakness analysis of AHP, PROMETHEE and Attribute Transformation. The decision making techniques which make all conditions satisfactory in all situations are nonexistent. Thus, it is estimated that we can maintain the objectivity in the source selection of weapon systems by applying suitable decision making techniques in accordance with the patterns of evaluation item.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2011.10a
• /
• pp.1816-1824
• /
• 2011

Recently, with traffic SOC investment policy changing from road-centered to railway-centered according to environment-friendly and sustainable development, issues regarding overlapping and overinvestment of traffic facility have been raised. Regarding investment of various traffic facilities of which departure and destination are similar to each other, academia, civic organizations, government, etc. are recognizing problems including overlapping investment of budget, environmental destruction, etc., but not suggesting definite solutions. Objective transportation network analysis is required because various positive effects including solutions of delay/congestion may occur due to provision of alternative way and distribution of the amount of traffic when accidents occur, as well as negative effects suggested by some of civic organizations in various transportation facility investment of similar departure and destination. Hereupon, this study tries to suggest a tool that can objectively evaluate interrelations of transportation network by applying multi-criteria analysis including economic feasibility regarding analysis of interconnections between and within means of transportation.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.06a
• /
• pp.647-650
• /
• 2005

Gas hydrates draw great at tent ion recently as a new clean energy resources substituting conventional oil and gas hydrate its presumed huge amount of volume reaching 10 trillion tons of gas and environmentally friendly characteristics. Gas hydrate can contribute to the rapidly increasing consumption of natural gas in Korea and achieve the self support target by 2010 which is $30\%$ of total natural gas demand. This paper shows the importance and benefit of Gas hydrate comparing with new & renewable energy in Korea