• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2019

Based on basic studies on the current status index of BF certification application for school facilities according to the BF certification implementation, this study sought to improve the direction of the different BF certification evaluation indexes for school facilities by investigating and analyzing the status of BF Reservation Certification for elementary schools. A comparative analysis of the status and evaluation indexes of 30 elementary schools in the Gyeongsang region that included indicators of external and internal facilities, sanitary facilities, guidance facilities, and other facilities indicated that school facilities are insufficient to discriminate based on criteria and thus need to be updated for accurate grading. For school facilities that are open for anyone to use, quality improvement should be induced by improving standards and adjusting points for items that earn middle and lower grades.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.109-110
• /
• 2012

최근 지구온난화로 인한 환경 문제의 심각성이 증가하고 있다. 이에 전 산업 부문에서 지구온난화에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 온실가스 배출량에 대한 규제를 강화하고 있다. 건설 산업에서도 온실가스 저감 대책으로 친환경 에너지 개발, 친환경 건축물 인증제도등 녹색기술의 활동이 활발히 진행 중에 있다. 그러나 이러한 활발한 연구와 노력에도 불구하고 건설공사의 각 단계별 과정에 따른 온실가스 배출량과의 이해관계를 파악하기에는 어려움이 있다. 따라서, 본 논문은 기존 연구문헌을 조사하여 건설공사 과정을 원자재 생산, 시공, 유지 및 관리, 해체 및 재활용의 단계로 구분하여, 건설공사의 각 단계에서 온실가스 배출량에 영향을 미치는 요인을 도출하고, 시스템 다이내믹스의 인과지도 작성을 통하여 온실가스 배출 원인을 분석하였다.

• Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.655-668
• /
• 2018

This paper analyzes the applicability and technology level of the green building element technology by analyzing the scorecard of the LEED Canada certified buildings. The results of this analysis will be able to evaluate the current status and level of application of green building element technology, and it will be used as a basic data to prepare for the revision of the certification standards and the establishment of strategies for the future green building activation. In this study, 1,010 LEED Canada certified buildings from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed. The results were analyzed by focusing on the status of greening by certification category and the characteristics of adoption by sub-category. The results of the study are summarized as follows. (1) EA category showed the biggest difference between the certification scores and the adoption rates than other categories, and it was confirmed that it is not easy category from the viewpoint of practical adoption. On the other hand, the ID (Innovation & Design Process) and WE were analyzed to be relatively easy to apply, with a score of over 72%. (2) In the case of Platinum class, the upper adoption rate is shown in all categories except MR. The Gold class shows the adoption rate of WE and ID in the top, and the middle rate in most categories. Silver grades showed lower rates in the three categories except WE, ID and EQ. Certified grades showed the adoption rates of the bottom except the two categories.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.30 no.6
• /
• pp.393-412
• /
• 2021

This study examines the assessment systems of LEED v4.1, an eco-friendly building evaluation system in the United States, and SITE v2, an assessment system for sustainable outdoor spaces, and then compares and examines them from the perspective ofrelevant laws and institutional guidelines and standards in Korea. The conclusion is as follows. First, the US eco-friendly certification system basically not only establishes an independent evaluation system according to the field of expertise, but also provides a sustainable city and community through response to the climate crisis and the comfort of the external space environment. It can be evaluated that securing the quality of life of healthy and happy city dwellers is the top priority. Second, Korea's Green Building Certification System (G-LEED) was basically based on the American LEED system, but it was judged that there was a fundamental difference. It was judged that there is a limitation in not being able to achieve an integrated approach through the participation of various expert groups and stakeholders, but also in the accumulation of more scientific and reliable data and information through the application of cutting-edge information and communication equipment. Third, in the case of external space in Korea, a sustainable assessment system has not been established, and not only is it dispersed in various legal and institutional guidelines, but also its effectiveness is judged to be very low. Therefore, it is judged that it is urgent to introduce and secure the applicability of SITES v2, a sustainable outdoor space assessment system in the United States. It was judged that the effectiveness should be secured through the upward adjustment of the minimum Ecological Area Ratio.