Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems (한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems (한국건축친환경설비학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Scoring Status and Adoption Characteristics by Evaluation Items based on LEED Canada Certified Cases

LEED Canada 인증건축물의 평가항목별 득점현황과 적용특성 분석

  • Choi, Dong-Ho (Department of Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 최동호 (대구가톨릭대학교 건축학부)
  • Received : 2018.12.03
  • Accepted : 2018.12.24
  • Published : 2018.12.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper analyzes the applicability and technology level of the green building element technology by analyzing the scorecard of the LEED Canada certified buildings. The results of this analysis will be able to evaluate the current status and level of application of green building element technology, and it will be used as a basic data to prepare for the revision of the certification standards and the establishment of strategies for the future green building activation. In this study, 1,010 LEED Canada certified buildings from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed. The results were analyzed by focusing on the status of greening by certification category and the characteristics of adoption by sub-category. The results of the study are summarized as follows. (1) EA category showed the biggest difference between the certification scores and the adoption rates than other categories, and it was confirmed that it is not easy category from the viewpoint of practical adoption. On the other hand, the ID (Innovation & Design Process) and WE were analyzed to be relatively easy to apply, with a score of over 72%. (2) In the case of Platinum class, the upper adoption rate is shown in all categories except MR. The Gold class shows the adoption rate of WE and ID in the top, and the middle rate in most categories. Silver grades showed lower rates in the three categories except WE, ID and EQ. Certified grades showed the adoption rates of the bottom except the two categories.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 대구가톨릭대학교

References

  1. 김동희, 조동우, 유기형. (2010). 친환경 건축물 인증제도의 용도별 인증결과 분석. 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 26(1), 323-330.
  2. 모혜란, 문미선, 한찬훈, 태춘섭. (2012). 업무용 친환경건축물의 득점체계 개선에 관한 연구. 한국태양에너지학회논문집, 32(5), 108-117.
  3. 안동준. (2016). LEED for EB 인증사례 분석을 통한 친환경적 건물운영 및 관리기법에 관한 연구. 한국건축친환경설비학회논문집, 10(1), 37-46.
  4. 이성옥, 배철학, 조동우, 박아름, 목선수, 이상호.. (2013). 공동주택 친환경건축물인증 평가항목별 득점현황 및 분석. 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 29(12), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.12.305
  5. 이성옥, 조동우, 박철용, 이상호. (2013). 해외 친환경건축물 인증제도와 국내 녹색건축 인증제도의 등급 인증을 위한 평가점수 산출방법 비교 분석 연구. 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 29(11). 283-290. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.11.283
  6. 최동호, 김가희. (2013). LEED 인증건축물의 평가항목별 득점현황 비교 분석 연구. 한국건축친환경설비학회논문집, 7(4), 295-304.
  7. 최동호, 김춘동. (2011). LEED Canada 친환경건축물 인증사례 조사를 통한 평가항목별 적용도 분석연구. 한국건축친환경설비학회논문집, 5(2), 94-104.
  8. 황선영, 태춘섭, 신우철. (2016). 업무용 건축물의 녹색건축 인증등급별 평가항목 득점에 관한 연구. 한국태양에너지학회논문집, 36(5), 9-18.
  9. 한국환경건축연구원. (2016). 녹색건축 인증건축물의 실태파악을 통한 실효적 적용기술 및 인증 후 관리방안 연구. 서울특별시.
  10. 2016 Annual Report. (2016). Canada Green Building Council, 19.
  11. https://www.gbc.re.kr/index.do