• Journal of the Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 2010

The aggregate, which does not satisfy the standard of KS F 2573, was selected for this investigation. The 28day compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete without pozzolan material was 21.7MPa, which was less than the strength of concrete made with crushed stone. However, the compressive strength at 28 days was improved by mixing early rapid hardening cement to the cement at the weight ratio of 2.5%. Furthermore, the compressive strength at 91 days and 180 days increased significantly by adding fly ash, slag powder, and diatom powder. The tensile strength of recycled aggregate concrete with pozzolan material also increased about 40% compared to the general concrete. Futhermore, the shrinkage and creep of recycled aggregate concrete with fly ash and slag powder was a little decreased that of recycled aggregate concrete with fly ash and diatom powder. Relationship between compressive strength and creep coefficient was shown to the linear relation like as ${\sigma}_c=-30CF+404$.

• Journal of the Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.253-259
• /
• 2021

Plastic wastes generated from household waste are separated by mixed discharge with foreign substances, and recycling is relatively low. In this study, the effect of the ratio and content of mixed plastic waste coarse aggregate(MPWCA)s and mixed plastic waste fine aggregate(MPWFA)s filled with blast furnace slag fine powder on the slump and compressive strength of concrete was evaluated experimentally. The MPWCAs were found to have a similar fineness modulus, but have a single particle size distribution with a smaller particle size compared to coarse aggregates. However, the MPWFAs were found to have a single particle size distribution with a larger fineness modulus and particle size compared to fine aggregates. Meanwhile, the effect of improving the density and filling pores by the blast furnace slag fine power was found to be greater in the MPWFA compared to the MPWCA. As the amount of the mixed plastic waste aggregate(MPWA)s increased, the slump and compressive strength of concrete decreased. In particular, the lower the slump and compressive strength of concrete was found to decrease the greater the amount of MPWFA than MPWCA when the amount of MPWA was the same. This is because of the entrapped air and voids formed under the angular- and ROD-shaped aggregates among the MPWFAs. On the other hand, the addition of the admixture and the increase in the unit amount of cement were found to be effective in improving the compressive strength of the concrete with MPWAs.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.33-34
• /
• 2009

In this paper, Recycled aggregate replacement levels were considered. Five columns are tested under axial load. Compressive strength of reinforced concrete columns with recycled aggregate showed higher than that provided in KCI 2007. The KCI provision were conservative and subsequently can be used for design of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete column.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.249-250
• /
• 2010

This study analyzes the basic characteristics of the concrete using recycled coarse aggregates produced by using a rotary crusher and compares it to that of using a cone crusher. As a result, the recycled aggregate produced by using the rotary crusher represents more excellent results in fluidity and compressive strength according to the increase in the replacement rate of recycled aggregates than that of using the cone crusher. It can be analyzed that it was due to the fact that the particle shape of the recycled aggregate produced by using the rotary crusher showed round figures relatively and that leaded to reduce friction force and remove lots of grouted mortar caused by its wearing.

• Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
• /
• v.11 no.6
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2007

Reuse of recycled aggregate from demolished concrete structure is beneficial and necessary from the viewpoint of environmental preservation and effective utilization of resources. The most important mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) are the compressive strength, the tensile and the flexural strengths, the bond strength and the elastic modulus of such concrete. In particular, the stress-strain relation and fracture process of RAC in compression is especially important in theoretical and numerical analysis as well as engineering design of RAC structures. In this paper, to clarify the characteristics of fracture process in RAC, acoustic emission(AE) method is applied to detect micro-cracking in concrete under compression. From AE parameters, it is found that cracking and fracture behaviors in recycled aggregate concrete fairly differ from that of normal and recycled sand concrete.

• Journal of the Korean Recycled Construction Resources Institute
• /
• v.5 no.3
• /
• pp.253-260
• /
• 2017

The aim of research is to investigate various physical properties of ultra high strength concrete of 80MPa class using a combination of limestone aggregate and electronic arc furnace oxidizing slag aggregate. For aggregate combinations, granite and limestone are used for coarse aggregate, granite and limestone are also used for fine aggregate. And also, limestone fine aggregate is replaced by electronic arc furnace oxidizing slag aggregate of 25% and 50%. Test results indicated that flowability and compressive strength increased when limestone fine aggregate was used compared to that using granite fine aggregate due to higher modulus of elasticity by limestone. Also substitution of electronic arc furnace oxidizing slag aggregate resulted in a decrease of compressive strength slightly. It is found that the use of electronic arc furnace oxidizing slag aggregate and limestone aggregate would be favorable for reducing the autogenous shrinkage by as much as 9~25%.

• Magazine of RCR
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 2012

• Magazine of RCR
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.29-31
• /
• 2016

• Magazine of RCR
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.38-46
• /
• 2019

• Magazine of RCR
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.29-35
• /
• 2023