• 고전문학과교육
• /
• 제39호
• /
• pp.67-97
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 같은 설화 작품에 대한 과거와 오늘날의 달라진 반응을 비교함으로써, 설화 향유에 관여하는 서로 다른 문화적 맥락을 밝히는 것을 목표로 한다. 이것은 세대 간 소통을 위한 설화교육 방법론을 모색하는 연구의 일환이다. 본 연구에서 대상으로 삼고 있는 작품은 <가짜 삼촌 위해 치성드린 아내>이며, "한국구비문학대계"에 채록된 이야기판의 반응과 현재 대학생 독자의 감상문을 비교했다. 채록 당시 이야기판에서는 이 설화 속 인물들의 처지를 불쌍하게 여기며 그들이 새로운 가족을 얻게 됨으로써 행복한 결말에 이르는 것을 기뻐했다. 반면 오늘날 대학생들은 이 설화 속 인물이 무능력하다고 보았고, 그들의 성공을 타인에게 의지하여 우연히 얻은 것이라 평가절하하였다. 이와 같은 차이는 설화를 이해하는 데 개입한 향유 집단의 문화와 밀접한 관련이 있었다. 채록 당시 향유자들의 문화 맥락은 공감, 동정심, 도움, 존중, 상호 의존성, 유대, 배려 등이 중요한 가치로 작용하였다. 그 결과 서사의 주체들이 인간관계를 맺기 위해 노력하는 것이나 그에 호응해 주는 것을 모두 훌륭한 태도로 보게 했다. 한편, 대학생의 반응은 개인의 자유의지와 권리가 존중되며 근면, 성실함이 강조되는 문화적 맥락에 기반하고 있었다. 그 결과 아내가 가짜 삼촌을 위해 기도하는 것을 의존적인 존재의 비합리적인 행동으로 이해하였고, 성공한 양반이 삼촌 노릇을 해주는 것은 요행히 착한 사람을 만나 아내와 남편이 보상을 얻게 된 것으로 보았다. 설화 이해에 기반이 된 문화적 맥락의 차이로 인해 <가짜 삼촌 위해 치성드린 아내> 속에 형상화된 삶은 대학생들에게 왜곡되었고 과거 세대와의 소통은 단절되었다. 이를 완화시킬 수 있는 설화 교육으로 대학생 향유자들에게 먼저 <백정 당숙 어사 조카>를 활용할 것을 제안했다. <백정 당숙 어사 조카>는 대학생의 사회문화적 맥락과 유사하면서 <가짜 삼촌 위해 치성드린 아내>와 문제의식이 비슷하기 때문이다. 그리하여 첫째 <백정 당숙어사 조카>를 통해서 대학생들에게 관습적 맥락과 대립을 경험하게 하고, 점차로 <가짜 삼촌 위해 치성드린 아내>에 대한 새로운 이해에 나아갈 수 있도록 단계화할 것을 제시했다.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 2016

"기헌(寄軒)집"에 실린 "심원정수석기(心遠亭水石記)"의 '심원정 25영'을 바탕으로, 일제강점기인 1937년에 기헌 조병선에 의해 조성되고 향유된 칠곡 심원정원림의 공간구성과 경관특성을 고찰한 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 심원정원림은 북쪽으로는 송림이 있는 '임수형(林藪型)'이자 원림 내부로 구야천이 흐르는 '계류형 별서원림'의 입지 특성을 공유하며 본제(本第)와는 직선거리로 약 400m 이격되어 있다. 2. 북쪽에는 가산(假山)인 학림산을, 동쪽과 서쪽에는 만경류를 올린 취병(翠屛)을, 남쪽으로는 구야천변의 석벽(隱屛)을 포치시키는 등 사방에 '가림'시설을 조성함으로써 위요공간 속에 은일을 추구한 기헌의 정신을 표출하고 있다. 3. 심성을 수양하는 선비의 소우주이자 거처로 조성되고 향유된 심원정원림은 송림사의 경역 내에 위치함으로써 불교사상을 수용하며, 도연명의 전원사상과 시선(詩仙)이라 불리는 이백의 낭만주적 감성을 통한 도가적 삶의 추구 그리고 주자의 성리학적 가치를 실현하는 통섭(統攝)의 장으로서의 면모를 엿볼 수 있다. 4. 심원정 25영 중 5영은 정운루 암수실 위류재 이열당 등의 용도가 다른 부속실과 이를 아우르는 정각인 '장수지소(藏修之所)' 심원정에 의탁되었으며 외원에 부여된 20영은 자연에 이름을 붙인 것 9개, 조성한 것 11개로 나뉘며, 자연에서 얻은 9영은 "석경기"에 기술된 바를 바위에 각인시켰다. 5. 현존하는 실내경물 4영은 편액으로, 원림내 경물 중 5개소는 바위글씨로 그리고 8개소는 표지석으로 각 경물이 인식되도록 의도했으나, 8개 영의 표식은 유실 및 훼철 등으로 확인되지 않는다. 6. 심원정 25영 중 '괴강(槐岡)'에는 학자수를 상징하는 회화나무, '유제(柳堤)'에는 도연명과 줄기찬 생명력을 상징하는 버드나무, '기천(杞泉)'에는 '가족의 단란함'을 상징하는 구기자나무 그리고 '동 서취병(東 西翠屛)'과 '방원(芳園)'에는 만경류와 초본류 등 다채로운 의미를 담는 식물경관이 등장한다. 또한 폭포(은폭(隱瀑)), 소(군자소(君子沼)), 못(양지(湯池)), 샘(기천(杞泉)), 바위를 가운데 두고 갈라 흐르는 물(반타석(盤陀石)) 그리고 바위 사이로 흐르는 물(수구암(水口巖)) 등 다채로운 수경관이 기도되었다. 7. 심원정원림은 수계 인접형 원림임에도 불구하고 11개 영을 직접 조성하는 등의 적극적인 개입이 두드러진다. 기존의 여타 정자원림이 가깝고 먼 곳에 자연 중심의 경(景)과 곡(曲)의 경물 설정에 충실한 곳이었다면, 심원정원림은 정자를 시점으로 의미 강화된 경물을 취경(聚景)하도록 유도된 적극적인 수경(修景)이 두드러진다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.165-203
• /
• 1987

This project was a service-cum-research effort with a quasi-experimental study design to examine the health benefits of an integrated Family Planning (FP)/Maternal & Child health (MCH) Service approach that provides crucial factors missing in the present on-going programs. The specific objectives were: 1) To test the effectiveness of trained nurse/midwives (MW) assigned as change agents in the Health Sub-Center (HSC) to bring about the changes in the eight FP/MCH indicators, namely; (i)FP/MCH contacts between field workers and their clients (ii) the use of effective FP methods, (iii) the inter-birth interval and/or open interval, (iv) prenatal care by medically qualified personnel, (v) medically supervised deliveries, (vi) the rate of induced abortion, (vii) maternal and infant morbidity, and (viii) preinatal & infant mortality. 2) To measure the integrative linkage (contacts) between MW & HSC workers and between HSC and clients. 3) To examine the organizational or administrative factors influencing integrative linkage between health workers. Study design; The above objectives called for quasi-experimental design setting up a study and control area with and without a midwife. An active intervention program (FP/MCH minimum 'package' program) was conducted for a 2 year period from June 1982-July 1984 in Seosan County and 'before and after' surveys were conducted to measure the change. Service input; This study was undertaken by the Soonchunhyang University in collaboration with WHO. After a baseline survery in 1981, trained nurses/midwives were introduced into two health sub-centers in a rural setting (Seosan county) for a 2 year period from 1982 to 1984. A major service input was the establishment of midwifery services in the existing health delivery system with emphasis on nurse/midwife's role as the link between health workers (nurse aids) and village health workers, and the referral of risk patients to the private physician (OBGY specialist). An evaluation survey was made in August 1984 to assess the effectiveness of this alternative integrated approach in the study areas in comparison with the control area which had normal government services. Method of evaluation; a. In this study, the primary objective was first to examine to what extent the FP/MCH package program brought about changes in the pre-determined eight indicators (outcome and impact measures) and the following relationship was first analyzed; b. Nevertheless, this project did not automatically accept the assumption that if two or more activities were integrated, the results would automatically be better than a non-integrated or categorical program. There is a need to assess the 'integration process' itself within the package program. The process of integration was measured in terms of interactive linkages, or the quantity & quality of contacts between workers & clients and among workers. Intergrative linkages were hypothesized to be influenced by organizational factors at the HSC clinic level including HSC goals, sltrurture, authority, leadership style, resources, and personal characteristics of HSC staff. The extent or degree of integration, as measured by the intensity of integrative linkages, was in turn presumed to influence programme performance. Thus as indicated diagrammatically below, organizational factors constituted the independent variables, integration as the intervening variable and programme performance with respect to family planning and health services as the dependent variable: Concerning organizational factors, however, due to the limited number of HSCs (2 in the study area and 3 in the control area), they were studied by participatory observation of an anthropologist who was independent of the project. In this observation, we examined whether the assumed integration process actually occurred or not. If not, what were the constraints in producing an effective integration process. Summary of Findings; A) Program effects and impact 1. Effects on FP use: During this 2 year action period, FP acceptance increased from 58% in 1981 to 78% in 1984 in both the study and control areas. This increase in both areas was mainly due to the new family planning campaign driven by the Government for the same study period. Therefore, there was no increment of FP acceptance rate due to additional input of MW to the on-going FP program. But in the study area, quality aspects of FP were somewhat improved, having a better continuation rate of IUDs & pills and more use of effective Contraceptive methods in comparison with the control area. 2. Effects of use of MCH services: Between the study and control areas, however, there was a significant difference in maternal and child health care. For example, the coverage of prenatal care was increased from 53% for 1981 birth cohort to 75% for 1984 birth cohort in the study area. In the control area, the same increased from 41% (1981) to 65% (1984). It is noteworthy that almost two thirds of the recent birth cohort received prenatal care even in the control area, indicating that there is a growing demand of MCH care as the size of family norm becomes smaller 3. There has been a substantive increase in delivery care by medical professions in the study area, with an annual increase rate of 10% due to midwives input in the study areas. The project had about two times greater effect on postnatal care (68% vs. 33%) at delivery care(45.2% vs. 26.1%). 4. The study area had better reproductive efficiency (wanted pregancies with FP practice & healthy live births survived by one year old) than the control area, especially among women under 30 (14.1% vs. 9.6%). The proportion of women who preferred the 1st trimester for their first prenatal care rose significantly in the study area as compared to the control area (24% vs 13%). B) Effects on Interactive Linkage 1. This project made a contribution in making several useful steps in the direction of service integration, namely; i) The health workers have become familiar with procedures on how to work together with each other (especially with a midwife) in carrying out their work in FP/MCH and, ii) The health workers have gotten a feeling of the usefulness of family health records (statistical integration) in identifying targets in their own work and their usefulness in caring for family health. 2. On the other hand, because of a lack of required organizational factors, complete linkage was not obtained as the project intended. i) In regards to the government health worker's activities in terms of home visiting there was not much difference between the study & control areas though the MW did more home visiting than Government health workers. ii) In assessing the service performance of MW & health workers, the midwives balanced their workload between 40% FP, 40% MCH & 20% other activities (mainly immunization). However, $85{\sim}90%$ of the services provided by the health workers were other than FP/MCH, mainly for immunizations such as the encephalitis campaign. In the control area, a similar pattern was observed. Over 75% of their service was other than FP/MCH. Therefore, the pattern shows the health workers are a long way from becoming multipurpose workers even though the government is pushing in this direction. 3. Villagers were much more likely to visit the health sub-center clinic in the study area than in the control area (58% vs.31%) and for more combined care (45% vs.23%). C) Organization factors (admistrative integrative issues) 1. When MW (new workers with higher qualification) were introduced to HSC, it was noted that there were conflicts between the existing HSC workers (Nurse aids with less qualification than MW) and the MW for the beginning period of the project. The cause of the conflict was studied by an anthropologist and it was pointed out that these functional integration problems stemmed from the structural inadequacies of the health subcenter organization as indicated below; i) There is still no general consensus about the objectives and goals of the project between the project staff and the existing health workers. ii) There is no formal linkage between the responsibility of each member's job in the health sub-center. iii) There is still little chance for midwives to play a catalytic role or to establish communicative networks between workers in order to link various knowledge and skills to provide better FP/MCH services in the health sub-center. 2. Based on the above findings the project recommended to the County Chief (who has power to control the administrative staff and the technical staff in his county) the following ; i) In order to solve the conflicts between the individual roles and functions in performing health care activities, there must be goals agreed upon by both. ii) The health sub·center must function as an autonomous organization to undertake the integration health project. In order to do that, it is necessary to support administrative considerations, and to establish a communication system for supervision and to control of the health sub-centers. iii) The administrative organization, tentatively, must be organized to bind the health worker's midwive's and director's jobs by an organic relationship in order to achieve the integrative system under the leadership of health sub-center director. After submitting this observation report, there has been better understanding from frequent meetings & communication between HW/MW in FP/MCH work as the program developed. Lessons learned from the Seosan Project (on issues of FP/MCH integration in Korea); 1) A majority or about 80% of the couples are now practicing FP. As indicated by the study, there is a growing demand from clients for the health system to provide more MCH services than FP in order to maintain the achieved small size of family through FP practice. It is fortunate to see that the government is now formulating a MCH policy for the year 2,000 and revising MCH laws and regulations to emphasize more MCH care for achieving a small size family through family planning practice. 2) Goal consensus in FP/MCH shouBd be made among the health workers It administrators, especially to emphasize the need of care of 'wanted' child. But there is a long way to go to realize the 'real' integration of FP into MCH in Korea, unless there is a structural integration FP/MCH because a categorical FP is still first priority to reduce the rate of population growth for economic reasons but not yet for health/welfare reasons in practice. 3) There should be more financial allocation: (i) a midwife should be made available to help to promote the MCH program and coordinate services, (in) there should be a health sub·center director who can provide leadership training for managing the integrated program. There is a need for 'organizational support', if the decision of integration is made to obtain benefit from both FP & MCH. In other words, costs should be paid equally to both FP/MCH. The integration slogan itself, without the commitment of paying such costs, is powerless to advocate it. 4) Need of management training for middle level health personnel is more acute as the Government has already constructed 90 MCH centers attached to the County Health Center but without adequate manpower, facilities, and guidelines for integrating the work of both FP and MCH. 5) The local government still considers these MCH centers only as delivery centers to take care only of those visiting maternity cases. The MCH center should be a center for the managment of all pregnancies occurring in the community and the promotion of FP with a systematic and effective linkage of resources available in the county such as i.e. Village Health Worker, Community Health Practitioner, Health Sub-center Physicians & Health workers, Doctors and Midwives in MCH center, OBGY Specialists in clinics & hospitals as practiced by the Seosan project at primary health care level.