• Title/Summary/Keyword: 가계의 경제적 복지

Search Result 40, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

Housing Expenditures of Elderly Households and Implication for Economic Well-Being (노인가계의 주거비지출과 경제복지)

  • Shim, Young
    • Korean Journal of Human Ecology
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.57-68
    • /
    • 1992
  • 1970년대 이래로 노인들의 평균적인 경제상태가 향상되어 왔지만, 상당한 수의 노인들이 여전히 빈곤할 뿐만 아니라 노인들 각자가 경험하는 경제복지는 다르다. 본 연구는 노인들이 경험하는 경제복지를 조사하고 이를 바탕으로 상이한 노인가계들간의 복지상태를 비교하였다. 경제복지는 주거비가 차지하는 가계소득에 대한 비로 측정하였다. 노인가계는 노부부가계, 노인남성가계, 노인여성가계로 구분하였다. 미국의 3,449 노인가계들이 연구분석에 사용되었다. 노인가계들간의 경제복지를 비교하기 위해 다중회귀분석이 사용되어졌다. 분석결과에 의하면 상이한 노인가계들간에 경제복지는 상당한 차이가 있었다. 특히 노인여성인 경우 경제복지가 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

  • PDF

Economic Effects of Welfare Policy: An Analysis of 2003 Korean Social Accounting Matrix (정부의 복지지출이 경제부문별 소득분배에 미치는 효과 분석)

  • Noh, Yong-hwan
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.40 no.1
    • /
    • pp.261-296
    • /
    • 2009
  • I constructed the 2003 Korean 'social accounting matrix'(SAM) to analyze the multipliers of total demand for each economic activity. I find that the relative magnitude of the influence of the welfare policy to the national economy measured by input-output production multipliers tends to be underestimated compared to SAM multipliers. This is because the total demand multipliers of SAM include the private sector effects, which is not considered in the input-output model. The result also support that income inflows in public service areas including education, health and social work, generate gains in the relative income of households.

An Analysis on the Economic Structures of Low-income Households: Policy Suggestion for Their Economic Well-being (저소득층 가계의 경제구조 분석: 경제적 복지를 위한 정책 제언)

  • Shim, Young
    • Journal of Consumption Culture
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.213-247
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study was to analyze the economic structures of low-income households, and to provide the policy suggestions for their economic well-being. The data for this study was from the 2009 year of the Korea Welfare Panel Survey (KOWEPS). The results are as follows: As for income structure, the low-income households had lower amounts in earned income, business and side-work income, and property income, but a higher amount in transfer income. They had a lower amount in private transfer income, but a higher amount in public transfer income. They had the highest rate of transfer income, showing that the rate of public transfer income was higher than that of private transfer income, and the government assistance was the highest rate in public transfer income. The households in extreme poverty had the lowest amounts in earned income, financial income, private transfer income, but the highest amount in public transfer income. The households in poverty had the lowest amount in transfer income. The households in extreme poverty, poverty and near poverty showed the highest rate in transfer income. As for asset structure, the low-income households had a lower amount in every type of assets. They showed the highest rate in total debt, and had a higher rate in housing asset, but lower rates in real-estate asset, financial asset and other asset. The households in extreme poverty had a lower amount in every type of assets than the households in near poverty. Three types of the low-income households showed the highest rate in housing asset, but the households in extreme poverty was the highest among them. As for expenditure structure, the low-income households had lower amounts in all of the expenditure items. They showed the highest rate in food expenditure, the second highest in other consumption expenditure. The households in extreme poverty showed lower amounts in almost all of the expenditure items than the households in near poverty, but the households in extreme poverty showed a higher amount in monthly rent than the households in neat poverty. Three types of the low-income households showed the highest rate in food expenditure. The expenditure rates of food, monthly rent and light·heat·water for households in extreme poverty were higher than those for the households in near poverty.

Impact of Indebtedness on the Risk of Domestic Violence (가계부채가 부부폭력의 위험에 미치는 영향)

  • Park, Jung Min;Park, Ho Jun;Oh, Ukchan
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.48 no.4
    • /
    • pp.33-57
    • /
    • 2017
  • As there is a growing concern about the steady increase in the consumer debt and its potential consequences on individuals and families, this study examined the association between personal debt and the risk of domestic violence, which in this study is referred to as violence between man and woman who have a spousal relationship. We used the data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study collected from 2009 to 2016. We applied a generalized estimating equation approach for the analysis of panel data. The results show that the higher the ratio of personal debt to disposable income and the ratio of debt payment to disposal income is, the greater the risk of domestic violence. While the debt to income ratio played a role regarding was related to a heightened risk of domestic violence among the poor group, the debt payment to income ratio was associated with a higher risk of domestic violence among the non-poor group. Implications of the study were discussed.

Female-Heads' Employment and Household Economic Status of the Single-Mother Households (편모가계 여성가장의 취업 및 가계의 경제상태 : 양부모 가계와의 비교 분석)

  • 이성림
    • Journal of Families and Better Life
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.169-179
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study investigated female-head's employment and household economic status of the single-mother households compared to those in the two-parent households using the data from the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study. Major findings are: first, female-heads showed lower educational attainment, lower labor force participation rate, lower occupational status, and lower wage rates than male-heads; second, the level of household income was as 1.3 times as the Minimum Living Cost and the level of household expenditure was close to the Minimum Living Cost; third, one-thirds of single-mother households were in poverty. Based on the results, the implications to public policy were suggested.

Private Education Expenditure for Children and Economic Well-being of Household (가계의 사교육비 지출과 경제적 복지)

  • 이승신
    • Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
    • /
    • v.40 no.7
    • /
    • pp.211-227
    • /
    • 2002
  • The issue of children′s education is the most important issue for all households in Korea. It is certain that the issue of private education for children is the first issue among household′s issues. This study is to recognize the current pictures of household primate education of Korean households. Also, whether the expenditure of private education effect the economic will-being of household. The data for this study was"the 3th Korean Labor Panal", conducted by Lobor in Korea. The sample was 1950 households from the panel data. The results of this study was as following: 1. The mean of monthly private education expenditure was 149273won for all households and 217,100won for households with high school students. 2. Almost 70% households had economic burden for private education expenditure. 0% households had no economic burden. 3. The factors of influencing the level of economic burden for private education were mother′s education level, mother′s job, the number of children, living location, monthly income, total asset of household′s. The factors of influencing the amount of monthly private education expenditure positively were living in 4. The economic well-being of household was analyzed by socio-economic variables, household′s financial variables, monthly private education expenditure, the level of economic burden of private education. The economic well-being were sub-categorized 4 divisions; the level of economic problem, the level of satisfaction for household′s income, the level of satisfaction for general living, the level of subject economic condition)

An Analysis of the Economic Well-being of Elderly Households based on Housing Ownership and Housing Costs (주택소유형태와 주거비용을 토대로 한 노인 단독가계의 경제복지 분석)

  • Shim, Young
    • Korean Journal of Human Ecology
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-38
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study was conducted to analyze the economic well-being of the elderly households based on the housing ownership and the housing costs, with the comparison between the coupled elderly and the single elderly. The results of this study were as follows: the household type was related to the housing ownership, showing that the single elderly households owned the housing less than the coupled elderly did. There was a difference in housing costs between the single elderly and the coupled elderly, showing the single elderly households had higher housing costs than the coupled elderly households. The housing ownership was significantly related, but the housing costs negatively related to the economic well-being of the elderly.

  • PDF

A Study on Determinants of Subjective Repayment Burden in Household Debt by Income Quintile Groups (가구의 소득분위별 가계부채 주관적 상환부담요인에 관한 연구)

  • Park, Yoon-Tae;Rho, Jeong-Hyun
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.17 no.9
    • /
    • pp.145-158
    • /
    • 2017
  • Lately, rapid increase of household debt and economic change has affected cash flow of household, insolvent risk has increased by high repayment burden of the principal and interest. Previous researches was progressing various discussion, composed objective repayment burden index about household debt. But it was relatively insufficient about perception of consumer. This research compare and analysis determinants of subjective repayment burden in household debt by income quintile, using 2016 Household Financial Welfare Survey. The research result is follows. The income 1 and 2 quartile groups have the higher monthly rent and credit card loan and the housing preparation loan ratio, the higher burden on repayment of the principal and interest. The Income 3 and 4 quartile groups have the higher 60s or older and member of household and real estate mortgage loan, the higher burden on repayment of the principal and interest. The Income 5 quartile group has the higher loan ratio for debt repayment preparation, the higher burden on repayment of the principal and interest.