• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.11 no.8
• /
• pp.2758-2765
• /
• 2010

A technology transfer from public research centers or national universities to a company is an increasing phenomenon. The purpose of this study is thus to identify the major evaluation criteria of technology transfer from a company viewpoint and establish the importance weights of criteria through 2 level AHP analysis. First, 12 critical elements are extracted from previous studies and professional interview and these elements are tied into 4 factors; technological factor, organizational factor, environmental factor, and strategic factor. The results of AHP analysis show that strategic factor is more important and 'the growth of the technology' in the strategic factor is the most important element. This study will be used usefully when researchers in public research centers or national universities try to develop a technology considering a technology transfer to the other company.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.347-353
• /
• 2019

Recent recommendation systems are developing toward the utilization of high-dimensional data. However, high-dimensional data can increase algorithm complexity by expanding dimensions and be lower the accuracy of recommended items. In addition, it can cause the problem of data sparsity and make it difficult to provide users with proper recommended items. This study proposed an algorithm that classify users' subjective data with objective criteria with fuzzy-AHP and make use of rules with repetitive patterns through fuzzy association rules. Trying to check how problems with high-dimensional data would be mitigated by the algorithm, we performed 5-fold cross validation according to the changing number of users. The results show that the algorithm-applied system recorded accuracy that was 12.5% higher than that of the fuzzy-AHP-applied system and mitigated the problem of data sparsity.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.22 no.5
• /
• pp.1115-1122
• /
• 2012

VoIP service is steadily growing due to the spread of smartphones, enhanced network, and various VoIP applications. But, VoIP has many security vulnerabilities because it is based on IP network. This paper analyzes the important weight of VoIP security checklists for incident prevention and response using AHP. The results of AHP analysis showed that network security, incident response, and access control were the most important in technical, administrative, physical standpoint. This study proposes factor analysis of VoIP security checklist at first time. By doing this, it will be used helpfully when VoIP service providers establish their own security policies and inspect their VoIP environment according to their security policies.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.235-248
• /
• 2022

Through the research on the design evaluation index of parent-child interactive game furniture, it is convenient for designers to quantitatively analyze the design advantages and disadvantages of related products, which is of positive help to control and improve the design quality. Combined with AHP and TOPSIS, this study proposes the evaluation model of three design criteria and 26 design indexes. After expert scoring, calculation, and consistency test of each index, the weight value of each design index is obtained, and the index is classified according to the importance of each index. Finally, eight essential indicators, eleven secondary indicators, and seven general indicators are classified. A case study was conducted with TOPSIS, and the design samples of three parent-child climbing game furniture were analyzed. Finally, the three samples' relative proximity was 0.505, 0281, and 0.640, respectively. The research shows that the AHP-TOPSIS method can scientifically and effectively sort and screen the advantages and disadvantages of design schemes and provide a reference for the research and development of related products.

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.123-140
• /
• 2007

This study focuses on establishing theoretically-reasonable framework of evaluation areas and items for the informatization program and analyzing the weights for each area and item by means of the AHP. To obtain the goal of this research, firstly, based on broadly reviewing previous literature and logical reasoning, the evaluation criteria were Identified and conceptualized, which were 3 evaluation phases, 5 evaluation areas, and 22 evaluation items. Secondly, The data used for calculating the weight values for the evaluation criteria were collected from 48 academic and practical experts in the field of the informatization program promotion using internet survey. Thirdly, the relative weights among evaluation phases, evaluation areas, and its items were derived by AHP analysis. The findings of this study are thought not only to be useful as a practical guideline in performing evaluating the informatization program but also to provide significant basis for constructing the theoretical framework of evaluating method and management of the informatization program.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.201-218
• /
• 1999

The article contains an introduction of possibility of applying Multi-Attribute Utility Theory(MAUT) for priority setting of R&D projects. MAUT is compared with AHP, which is widely used recently. These two techuiques are applied to set priorities of R&D projects In a Government-funded Research Institute. Six criteria are chosen from consultation with decision makers. They are composed of 1) validity as representative projects, 2) possibility of resource mobilization, 3) spillover effect of developed technologies, 4) possibility of success, 5) scope of participation and 6) clarity of research goal. To set priorities of R&D projects, SMART(Simple MultiAttribute Rating Technique) and DVM(Difference Value Measurement) out of many MAUT methods are used to design the utility function and to determine the weights among criteria. The aggregation model is additive on the assumption the criteria are independent. AHP executes pairwise comparisons for criteria and alternatives. From the results of the case study, the results and theoretical characteristics are compared.

• Proceedings of the KSR Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.213-218
• /
• 2004

In this research, we investigate the method to support decision making of researcher when they estimate the safety on the subway using AHP of Saaty. To apply this technique, we apply to subway system. The AHP suggested by Saaty in 1971 is a tool to support a decision-making including the personal opinion and intuition, and it is easier than other method. Then, it has an advantage that control the complex object having multiple criteria simply. And we suggest the eight stage of accident type and the five criteria that must meet. Based on AHP, we concluded a safety in subway is more important factor than any other factors including economic points of view.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.437-440
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 제품 개발과 관련된 시장 환경 요소들을 고려하여 신속한 제품 개발에 관한 의사 결정을 할 수 있는 AHP 모형을 제안하고, 정량화 된 데이터를 이용한 AHP 의사결정 프로세스를 구축하고자 하였다. AHP 모형의 경우 전문가 집단(연구원 집단, 엔지니어 집단, 판매자 집단)별로 의사결정의 차이점을 보여 줌으로서 각각의 시장 상황에 맞는 의사결정을 경영자가 효율적으로 판단할 수 있도록 제시하였으며, 신제품 디자인 선정의 간단한 프로세스를 제시하여 반복적인 생산자의 의사 결정을 합리적이고 신속하게 할 수 있는 방법론을 제시하였다. 프로세스에서는 하위 의사결정 단계에서 가능한 데이터의 정량화를 통해 쌍별 비교 행렬을 만듦으로써, AMP기법의 정확성을 높이고 모델의 민감도 분석이 가능하게 하였다.

• Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy
• /
• v.19 no.5
• /
• pp.453-459
• /
• 2008

In general, reliability of AHP depends on pairwise comparison of evaluators. In addition, human judgment on the importance of alternatives or criteria is always imprecise and vague. The Fuzzy AHP technique is suggested and used widely recently. In this paper, we prioritize future energy technology development for well focused R&D. We selected 3 criteria and 10 sub-criteria. According to the result in this study, the most important sub-criterion is the precedence over other competitive technology, the second is the possibility for fundamental technology acquisition, and the third is the improvement energy efficiency. The other side, the lowest important sub-criterion is the technology level compared with advanced countries.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.11
• /
• pp.681-689
• /
• 2012

This study shows that the policy directions to invigorate smart education for special education based on the view of special education teachers through AHP methodology. The result shows that development of smart contents, supporting for teaching and learning, smart education networking, establishment of legal foundation and supporting for infrastructure are relatively important policy ordered by weights. The analysis indicates that the contents development policy should be strategic direction for smart education in special education.