DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bacterial Contamination of Veterinary Ear Cleaners in Homes and Clinics

  • Soonjoo Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Minji Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hyerin Suh (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Junho Lee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seulgi Bae (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Taeho Oh (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.10.09
  • 심사 : 2024.10.20
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31

초록

Ear cleaning using ear cleaners is recommended for the prevention of canine otitis externa. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of bacterial contamination in home- and clinical-use ear cleaners and identify characteristics associated with such a prevalence. To obtain data regarding home-use ear cleaners, 100 bottles of commercial ear cleaners were collected from clients who visited animal clinics with their dogs and completed a survey. Data for clinic-use ear cleaners were obtained by gathering 60 bottles of ear cleaners from private animal hospitals. Bacterial culture of the applicator tips and samples of the ear cleaners was performed. In addition, to determine the relationship between ear cleaner contamination and otitis externa (OE) in dogs, ear cultures were obtained from some of the dogs that visited the clinics. Approximately 5% and 4.91% of home- and clinic-use ear cleaner applicator tips, respectively, had bacterial contamination, although no contamination of the solution within the bottles was observed. Most of the contaminated ear cleaner tips were unclean on the outside given that the bottle was placed directly into the ear canal. The contamination rate was highest among owners who used ear cleaners once a week and among veterinarians who used the product for dogs with OE. We found no ingredients that affected the incidence of ear cleaner contamination.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bartlett SJ, Rosenkrantz WS, Sanchez S. Bacterial contamination of commercial ear cleaners following routine home use. Vet Dermatol 2011; 22: 546-553.
  2. Blue JL, Wooley RE, Eagon RG. Treatment of experimentally induced Pseudomonas aeruginosa otitis externa in the dog by lavage with EDTA-tromethamine-lysozyme. Am J Vet Res 1974; 35: 1221-1223.
  3. Bouassiba C, Osthold W, Mueller RS. [In-vivo efficacy of a commercial ear antiseptic containing chlorhexidine and Tris-EDTA. A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded comparative trial]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2012; 40: 161-170.
  4. Cole LK, Kwochka KW, Kowalski JJ, Hillier A. Microbial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolated pathogens from the horizontal ear canal and middle ear in dogs with otitis media. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 534-538.
  5. Cole LK, Kwochka KW, Kowalski JJ, Hillier A, Hoshaw-Woodard SL. Evaluation of an ear cleanser for the treatment of infectious otitis externa in dogs. Vet Ther 2003; 4: 12-23.
  6. Graham-Mize CA, Rosser EJ Jr. Comparison of microbial isolates and susceptibility patterns from the external ear canal of dogs with otitis externa. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2004; 40: 102-108.
  7. Guardabassi L, Ghibaudo G, Damborg P. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a commercial ear antiseptic containing chlorhexidine and Tris-EDTA. Vet Dermatol 2010; 21: 282-286.
  8. Guardabassi L, Loeber ME, Jacobson A. Transmission of multiple antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus intermedius between dogs affected by deep pyoderma and their owners. Vet Microbiol 2004; 98: 23-27.
  9. Kaul AF, Jewett JF. Agents and techniques for disinfection of the skin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981; 152: 677-685.
  10. Larocque M, Carver S, Bertrand A, McGeer A, McLeod S, Borgundvaag B. Acquisition of bacteria on health care workers' hands after contact with patient privacy curtains. Am J Infect Control 2016; 44: 1385-1386.
  11. Lloyd DH, Bond R, Lamport I. Antimicrobial activity in vitro and in vivo of a canine ear cleanser. Vet Rec 1998; 143: 111-112.
  12. Lloyd DH, Lamport AI. Evaluation in vitro of the antimicrobial activity of two topical preparations used in the management of ear infections in the dog. Vet Ther 2000; 1: 43-47.
  13. Lyskova P, Vydrzalova M, Mazurova J. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria and yeasts isolated from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis externa. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2007; 54: 559-563.
  14. Nuttall T, Cole LK. Ear cleaning: the UK and US perspective. Vet Dermatol 2004; 15: 127-136.
  15. Paterson S. Topical ear treatment - options, indications and limitations of current therapy. J Small Anim Pract 2016; 57: 668-678.
  16. Perry LR, MacLennan B, Korven R, Rawlings TA. Epidemiological study of dogs with otitis externa in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. Can Vet J 2017; 58: 168-174.
  17. Reme CA, Pin D, Collinot C, Cadiergues MC, Joyce JA, Fontaine J. The efficacy of an antiseptic and microbial anti-adhesive ear cleanser in dogs with otitis externa. Vet Ther 2006; 7: 15-26.
  18. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Diseases of eyelids, claws, anal sacs, and ears. In: Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE, editors. Muller & Kirk's small animal dermatology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. 2001: 1185-1235.
  19. Steen SI, Paterson S. The susceptibility of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from dogs with otitis to topical ear cleaners. J Small Anim Pract 2012; 53: 599-603.
  20. Strauss TB, McKeever TM, McKeever PJ. The efficacy of an acidified sodium chlorite solution to treat canine Pseudomonas aeruginosa otitis externa. Vet Med 2005; 100; 55-63.
  21. Swinney A, Fazakerley J, McEwan N, Nuttall T. Comparative in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of commercial ear cleaners. Vet Dermatol 2008; 19: 373-379.
  22. Wooley RE, Jones MS. Action of EDTA-Tris and antimicrobial agent combinations on selected pathogenic bacteria. Vet Microbiol 1983; 8: 271-280.
  23. Zur G, Lifshitz B, Bdolah-Abram T. The association between the signalment, common causes of canine otitis externa and pathogens. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52: 254-258.