DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Forage quality and fermentation dynamics of silages of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) wilted for varying periods

  • Yan Fen Li (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Li Li Wang (Research Institute of Eco-friendly Livestock Science, Institute of GreenBio Science Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Young Sang Yu (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Xaysana Panyavong (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Li Zhuang Wu (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jong Geun Kim (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.18
  • 심사 : 2024.06.07
  • 발행 : 2024.12.01

초록

Objective: This trial was conducted to explore the impact of different wilting time of Italian ryegrass (IRG) in the field on the nutritional quality and fermentation characteristics of its silage. Methods: The harvested IRG was directly wilted in the field for 0 day (W0), 1 day (W1), 2 days (W2), and 3 days (W3), respectively, and tedded every 6 hours. And the preserved IRG was sampled at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 45 days after ensiling and three replicates per treatment. Results: With the extension of wilting, the dry matter (DM) content and pH value of wilted IRG gradually increased (p<0.05). There was a downward trend in; neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and hemicellulose with the increase of wilting time, but only W2 and W3 were significantly different from W0 (p<0.05). Crude protein (CP), in vitro DM digestibility), total digestible nutrients (TDN), and relative feed value decreased significantly with the increase of wilting time (p<0.05), except for W1. After 45 days of ensiling, W1 had the highest CP, TDN, and the lowest ADF and NDF. During ensiling, the increase of acetic acid and the decrease of WSC in W0 and W1 were similar, but the accumulation rate of lactic acid in W0 was faster than that in W1, resulting in the lowest pH value in W0. After 5 days of ensiling, the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid in W1 stabilized at around 3:1, while W0 kept changing. Conclusion: Italian ryegrass that wilted in the field for 1 day effectively improved the dynamic changes in CP, TDN, ADF, and NDF and fermentation quality of silage. Therefore, in practice, W1 was more recommended in production of IRG silage.

키워드

과제정보

This study was financially supported by Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (RS-2021-RD010124).

참고문헌

  1. Fluck AC, Costa OAD, Schafhauser Junior J, et al. In vitro and in situ digestibility of annual ryegrass silage from distinct phenological growth stages and predehydration times. Biosci J 2018;34:1239-47. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n5a2018-39421
  2. Soundharrajan I, Kuppusamy P, Park HS, et al. Lactic acid bacteria mixture as inoculants on low moisture italian ryegrass silage fermentation. J Kor Soc Grassl Forage Sci 2019;39:127-31. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2019.39.3.127
  3. MAFRA. The current situation of forage increase production and supplementation policy. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2019.
  4. Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:3952-79. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837
  5. Eikmeyer FG, Kofinger P, Poschenel A, et al. Metagenome analyses reveal the influence of the inoculant Lactobacillus buchneri CD034 on the microbial community involved in grass ensiling. J Biotechnol 2013;167:334-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.07.021
  6. Yin X, Zhao J, Wang S, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T. The effects of epiphytic microbiota and chemical composition of Italian ryegrass harvested at different growth stages on silage fermentation. J Sci Food Agric 2023;103:1385-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12232
  7. Yan Y, Li X, Guan H, et al. Microbial community and fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria. Bioresour Technol 2019;279:166-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107
  8. Popescu RG, Radulescu AL, Georgescu SE, Dinischiotu A. Aflatoxins in feed: types, metabolism, health consequences in swine and mitigation strategies. Toxins 2022;14:853. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120853
  9. Charmley E. Towards improved silage quality-a review. Can J Anim Sci 2001;81:157-68. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-066
  10. Liu Q, Zhang J, Shi S, Sun Q. The effects of wilting and storage temperatures on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of stylo silage. Anim Sci J 2011;82:549-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00873.x
  11. Nishino N, Li Y, Wang C, Parvin S. Effects of wilting and molasses addition on fermentation and bacterial community in guinea grass silage. Lett Appl Microbiol 2012;54:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03191.x
  12. Horwitz W. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC international;2000.
  13. Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 1954;57:508-14. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508
  14. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  15. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). In: United States Department of Agriculture, editor. Washington, DC, USA:US Agricultural Research Service; 1970.
  16. Ahmadi F, Li YF, Jeong EC, Wang LL. Bharanidharan R, Kim JG. Comparative accuracy of in vitro rumen fermentation and enzymatic methodologies for determination of undigested neutral detergent fiber in forages and development of predictive equations using NIRS. Agriculture 2022;12:1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111914
  17. Schroeder JW. Forage nutrition for ruminants. Fargo, USA: North Dakota State University Extension Service; 2004.
  18. Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J Anim Sci 1978;47:747-59. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.473747x
  19. Wei SN, Jeong EC, Li YF, Kim HJ, Ahmadi F, Kim JG. Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). J Anim Sci Technol 2022;64:38-51. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e131
  20. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci 1980;63:64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
  21. Driehuis F, van Wikselaar PG. The occurrence and prevention of ethanol fermentation in high-dry-matter grass silage. J Sci Food Agric 2000;80:711-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000501)80:6<711::AID-JSFA593>3.0.CO;2-6
  22. Nishino N, Li Y, Wang C, Parvin S. Effects of wilting and molasses addition on fermentation and bacterial community in guinea grass silage. Lett Appl Microbiol 2012;54:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03191.x
  23. Ribas WFG, Moncao FP, Rocha Junior VR, et al. Effect of wilting time and enzymatic-bacterial inoculant on the fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and nutritional value of BRS capiacu grass silage. Rev Bras Zootecn 2021;50:e20200207. https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200207
  24. Polak M, Jancova M. Effectiveness of conditioning herbage at harvesting. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Forage Conservation; 2006 April 3-5: Brno, Czech Republic. pp. 186-9.
  25. Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Elferink SO, Spoelstra SF. Microbiology of ensiling. Silage Sci Technol 2003;42:31-93. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2
  26. Keles G, O'Kiely P, Lenehan JJ, Forristal PD. Conservation characteristics of baled grass silages differing in duration of wilting, bale density and number of layers of plastic stretchfilm. Irish J Agric Food Res 2009;48:21-34.
  27. Muller CE, Pauly TM, Uden P. Storage of small bale silage and haylage -influence of storage period on fermentation variables and microbial composition. Grass Forage Sci 2007; 62:274-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00580.x
  28. Orosz S, Bellus Z, Kroll B. Alfalfa bale-silage: a new baleforming technology. In: Rajcakova L, editor. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Forage Conservation; 2008 September 3-5: Nitra, Slovakia. Nitra, Slovakia: Slovak Agricultural Research Centre, Research Institute of Animal Production, Nitra; 2008. pp. 166-7.
  29. Sahar AK, Vurarak Y, Cubukcu P, Yucel H. Determining the effects of wilting time on some quality parameters in soybean haylage. Turk J Field Crops 2020;25:26-31. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.526235
  30. Gomez EJ, Delgado JA, Gonzalez JM. Influence of water availability and temperature on estimates of microbial extracellular enzyme activity. Peer J 2021;9:e10994. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10994
  31. Gheller LS, Ghizzi LG, Takiya CS, et al. Different organic acid preparations on fermentation and microbiological profile, chemical composition, and aerobic stability of wholeplant corn silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2021;281:115083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115083
  32. McDonald P, Henderson A, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow, England: Chalcombe publications;1991.
  33. Guo XS, Undersander DJ, Combs DK. Effect of inoculants and forage dry matter on the fermentation and aerobic stability of ensiled mixed-crop tall fescue and meadow fescue. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:1735-44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2045-5786
  34. Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:4020-33. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909
  35. Valente ME, Borreani G, Caredda S, Cavallarin L, Sulas L. Ensiling forage garland (Chrysanthemum coronarium L.) at two stages of maturity and at different wilting levels. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003;108:181-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00123-8