Animal Bioscience

  • 제37권11호
  • /
  • Pages.2000-2007
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavioral, physiological, and hormonal responses during pre-slaughter handling in goats: a comparison between trained and untrained handlers

  • Pavan Kumar (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Ahmed Abubakar Abubakar (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Muideen Adewale Ahmed (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Muhammad Nizam Hayat (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Fakhrullah Abd Halim (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Md. Moklesur Rahman (Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Mokrish Ajat (Department of Veterinary Preclinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Ubedullah Kaka (Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Yong-Meng Goh (Department of Veterinary Preclinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Awis Qurni Sazili (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.28
  • 심사 : 2024.04.15
  • 발행 : 2024.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The livestock handler attitude and their handling of animals is crucial for improving animal welfare standards, minimizing stress, improving productivity and meat quality. The present study was undertaken to assess the effect of training livestock handlers on behavioral, physiological, and hormonal responses during preslaughter handling in goats. Methods: A total of 6 handlers were divided into trained (trained in basic animal handling practices, animal behavior, and animal welfare), contact trained (not trained directly but interacted and saw the working of trained handlers), and untrained groups (no formal training). The handling experiment was conducted on 18 male goats by following a crossover design. The goats were moved from lairage to slaughter point by trained, contact-trained, and untrained handlers. Various behavioral, physiological, and hormonal parameters were recorded at the lairage before handling and at the slaughter point after handling the goats. Results: The training of livestock handlers had a significant effect on behavioral, physiological, and hormonal responses in goats. The goats handled by untrained and contact-trained handlers were recorded with intense vocalization, significant (p<0.05) increase in heart rate and blood glucose, and catecholamines (adrenaline and nor-adrenaline), thereby indicating stress and poor animal welfare. The trained handlers were observed to use visual interactions (waving of hands or objects, blocking, hand raising, etc), and lower stress responses were recorded in the goats handled by this group. Conclusion: The present study highlights the importance of training to livestock handlers in improving animal welfare and minimizing stress in goats during pre-slaughter stress.

키워드

과제정보

The first author, Pavan Kumar, is thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, for providing the Netaji Subhas ICAR International Fellowship for pursuing his doctoral study at Universiti Putra Malaysia.

참고문헌

  1. Kumar P, Abubakar AA, Ahmed MA, et al. Pre-slaughter stress mitigation in goats: prospects and challenges. Meat Sci 2023;195:109010. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2022.109010
  2. Sawchenko PE, Li H-Y, Ericsson A. Circuits and mechanisms governing hypothalamic responses to stress: a tale of two paradigms. Prog Brain Res 2000;122:61-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62131-7
  3. Sejian V, Silpa MV, Nair MRR, et al. Heat Stress and goat welfare: adaptation and production considerations. Animals 2021;11:1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041021
  4. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, Al-Kindi A, Al-Marzooqi W, Al-Saqri NM. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Sci 2006;73:626-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.003
  5. Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci 2008;80:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
  6. Grandin T, Shivley C. How farm animals react and perceive stressful situations such as handling, restraint, and transport. Animals 2015;5:1233-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5040409
  7. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, et al. Welfare of sheep and goats at slaughter. EFSA J 2021;19:e06882. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6882
  8. Ceballos MC, Sant'Anna AC, Boivin X, Costa F de O, Carvalhal MV de L, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Impact of good practices of handling training on beef cattle welfare and stockpeople attitudes and behaviors. Livest Sci 2018;216:24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.019
  9. Grandin T. Animal welfare and society concerns finding the missing link. Meat Sci 2014;98:461-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2014.05.011
  10. Coleman G, Hemsworth PH. Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity. Rev Sci Tech 2014;33:131-7. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2257
  11. Leon AF, Sanchez JA, Romero MH. Association between attitude and empathy with the quality of human-livestock interactions. Animals 2020;10:1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081304
  12. Ceballos MC, Sant'Anna AC, Boivin X, de Oliveira Costa F, de L. Carvalhal MV, da Costa MJRP. Impact of good practices of handling training on beef cattle welfare and stockpeople attitudes and behaviors. Livest Sci 2018;216:24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.019
  13. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Pinal R, Fuchs K, Montaldo HH, Ducoing A, Galindo F. Environmental enrichment and social rank affects the fear and stress response to regular handling of dairy goats. J Vet Behav 2013;8:342-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.03.001
  14. Siebert K, Langbein J, Schon PC, Tuchscherer A, Puppe B. Degree of social isolation affects behavioural and vocal response patterns in dwarf goats (Capra hircus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;131:53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.003
  15. Grandin T, Vogel KD. Restaurant animal welfare and humane slaughter audits in US federally inspected beef and pork slaughter plants [Internet]. Colorado, USA: grandin.com; 2011 [cited 2023 Dec 19]. Available from: https://www.grandin.com/survey/2011.restaurant.audits.html
  16. Shimizu T, Shimizu S, Higashi Y, Saito M. Psychological/mental stress-induced effects on urinary function: possible brain molecules related to psychological/mental stress-induced effects on urinary function. Int J Urol 2021;28:1093-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14663
  17. Kumar P, Abubakar AA, Ahmed MA, et al. Electroencephalogram and physiological responses as affected by slaughter empathy in goats. Animals 2023;13:1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061100
  18. Ekiz EE, Yalcintan H. Comparison of certain haematological and biochemical parameters regarding pre-slaughter stress in Saanen, Maltese, Gokceada and hair goat kids. Acta Vet Eurasia 2013;39:189-96.
  19. Kuchenmeister U, Kuhn G, Ender K. Preslaughter handling of pigs and the effect on heart rate, meat quality, including tenderness, and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transport. Meat Sci 2005;71:690-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.05.020
  20. Goldstein DS, Holmes C. Neuronal source of plasma dopamine. Clin Chem 2008;54:1864-71. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107193
  21. Al-Abry GS, Mahmoud IY, Al-Bahry SN, Mann G. Catecholamine andcortisol levels in relation to temperature and transportation stress in goats. Res J Biol Sci 2014; 9:205-15.
  22. Ekiz B, Ekiz EE, Kocak O, Yalcintan H, Yilmaz A. Effect of pre-slaughter management regarding transportation and time in lairage on certain stress parameters, carcass and meat quality characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Sci 2012;90:967-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2011.11.042
  23. Sabow AB, Goh YM, Zulkifli I, et al. Electroencephalographic and blood parameters changes in anaesthetised goats subjected to slaughter without stunning and slaughter following different electrical stunning methods. Anim Prod Sci 2019;59:849-60. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17486
  24. Terlouw C, Bourguet C. Chapter 1: quantifying animal welfare preslaughter using behavioural, physiological and carcass and meat quality measures. In: Faucitano L, editors. Pre-slaughter handling and slaughter of meat animals. Wageningen, Netherlands: Academic Publishers; 2022. pp. 13-61. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-924-4_1
  25. Mears GJ, Brown FA. Cortisol and β-endorphin responses to physical and psychological stressors in lambs. Can J Anim Sci 1997;77:689-94. https://doi.org/10.4141/A97-051
  26. Xiong X, Zhang L, Fan M, et al. β-Endorphin induction by psychological stress promotes leydig cell apoptosis through p38 MAPK pathway in male rats. Cells 2019;8:1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101265
  27. Sudakov SK, Sotnikov SV, Chekmareva NY, Kolpakov AA, Chumakova YA, Umryukhin AE. Changes in β-endorphin level in the cingulate cortex in rats after peripheral loperamide and methylnaloxone administration at rest and during emotional stress. Bull Exp Biol Med 2010;149:167-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-010-0898-z
  28. Bruehl S, Burns JW, Chung OY, Chont M. What do plasma beta-endorphin levels reveal about endogenous opioid analgesic function? Eur J Pain 2012;16:370-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00021.x