Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Posthuman Characteristics Expressed in Fashion Images

패션 이미지의 포스트휴먼 표현 특성

  • Seoyoung Choi (Dept. of Fashion and Textiles, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jisoo Ha (Dept. of Fashion and Textiles, Seoul National University/Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
  • 최서영 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 하지수 (서울대학교 의류학과/서울대학교 생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2024.02.13
  • Accepted : 2024.07.01
  • Published : 2024.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Regarding the evolving technological landscapes and the integration of fashion imagery into virtual spaces, like the metaverse, this research navigated the transformative dimensions of body expression in contemporary fashion. It is rooted in a posthuman framework, interpreting the novel forms of representation emerging in this dynamic technology-fashion intersection. A comprehensive exploration of posthumanism, transhumanism, and posthuman perspectives preceded the image analysis to elucidate shifting paradigms in portraying the human form within artworks. The analysis of posthuman expressions in fashion imagery unveiled a rejection of hierarchical viewpoints within the human species, challenged gender norms, and embraced diverse body representations. Four distinctive classifications emerged: "Incapacitating of Male Power from Gaze," "Revealing Fearlessly," "Fashioning Non-human Beings," and "Techno-morphism of Body." These categories emphasized transcending conventional beauty standards, highlighting inclusivity by embracing diverse body representations and technologically integrated expressions in fashion. This study addressed the need for more comprehensive ones on evolving posthuman classifications in fashion imagery. The identified trends offered valuable insights for image creators and scholars, encouraging deeper exploration of expressive intentions and perspectives.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 석사학위 논문의 일부임.

References

  1. Berger, J. (2008). Ways of seeing. Penguin Books.
  2. Bostrom, N. (2003). Human genetic enhancements: A transhumanist perspective. Journal of Value Inquiry, 37(4), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:inqu.0000019037.67783.d5
  3. Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1-25. https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf
  4. Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
  5. Caporael, L. R. (1986). Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(86)90004-X
  6. Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking. Oxford University Press.
  7. Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
  8. Cheon, H. (2016). Human nature in the posthuman era. CHEOLHAK: Korean Journal of Philosophy, 126, 157-182. http://doi.org/10.18694/kjp.2015.11.126.157
  9. Choi, J. H. (2011a). The expressive characteristics of the posthuman body in fashion illustration. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(9), 1085-1098. https://doi.org/10.5850/jksct.2011.35.9.1085
  10. Choi, J.-H. (2011b). An analysis of posthuman's body type and fashion in SF movies. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 19(3), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2011.19.3.473
  11. Clark, K. (2002). The nude: A study in ideal form (J. Lee, Trans.). Yeolhwadang. (Original work published 1959)
  12. Comita, J. (2017, September 7). Student submission: Sexting. SHOWstudio. https://www.showstudio.com/projects/master/student-submission-sexting
  13. Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The "Anthropocene". In E. Ehlers, & T. Krafft (Eds.), Earth System Science in the Anthropocene (pp. 13-18). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3
  14. Dansk Magazine [@danskmagazine]. (2020, March 11). |NEW SEDUCTIONS| You'll hurt yourself on this one. Photographer @marcovanrijt Creative Director @uffebuchard Fashion Editor @mathildestorm Coordinating Fashion Editor@nicolaianker [Photographs]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/B9j6tNDnfMP/?igsh=MTg2NTh5bm04Ynk1Mw
  15. Entwistle, J. (2015). The fashioned body: Fashion, dress and modern social theory (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32. https://existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8-2Ferrando.html
  17. Fuchs, C. (2022). Digital humanism: A philosophy for 21st century digital society. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  18. Gaines, J. M., & Herzog, C. (Eds.). (1990). Fabrications: Costume and the female body. Routledge.
  19. Halberstam, J. M., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Indiana University Press.
  20. Hamilton, C. (2017). Defiant earth: The fate of humans in the Anthropocene. John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Han, N., & Park, J. (2020). A study on the internal characteristics of posthuman in contemporary fashion show. Journal of Fashion Design, 20(3), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.18652/2020.20.3.2
  22. Harbisson, N. (2012, June). I listen to color [Video]. TEDXTalk. http://www.ted.com/talks/neil_harbisson_i_listen_to_color
  23. Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury Academic.
  24. Heyman, F. (n.d.). Y/Poject campaign FW19 accessories [Video]. https://frederikheyman.com/Y-PROJECT
  25. Horn, E., & Bergthaller, H. (2019). The Anthropocene: Key issues for the humanities. Routledge.
  26. Jeon, H. (2015). Skin where boundaries are crumbling. Association of Western Art History, 43, 115-139. https://doi.org/10.16901/jawah.2015.08.43.115
  27. Jin, D. (2015). 사진기호학 [Semiotics of photography]. Purunsesang.
  28. Jones, A. (1998). Body art/performing the subject. University of Minnesota Press.
  29. Jones, A., & Stephenson, A. (Eds.). (2005). Performing the body/performing the text. Routledge.
  30. Keller, E. F., & Grontkowski, C. R. (1983). The mind's eye. In S. Harding, & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 207-224). Springer Netherlands.
  31. Kher, B. (n.d.). Arione's sister [Photograph]. Bharti Kher. https://bhartikher.com/ariones-sister
  32. King Kong Magazine [@kingkongmagazine]. (2022a, April 5). What's the name of the game? Life's just a game. Is it? Is it really? And even if it is, [Video]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cb71Bg5ob-S/?igsh=MTVlNGMxbDU5MzN1cQ
  33. King Kong Magazine [@kingkongmagazine]. (2022b, May 5). High Heels On The Battlefield × @antiagencyldn for the Gaming issue of #kingkongmagazine by @foxxatron. @ debbiedarko_ @ei.re.ny @juliepommaz @mimi.dey @ bellasumrz [Photographs]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CdK8vFZIRGF/?igsh=MXF1aGRhNmZnN25jbg
  34. King Kong Magazine [@kingkongmagazine]. (2022c, April 24). STIMULATING SIMULATIONS with @lava_baby for the Gaming issue of #kingkongmagazine 13. Interview by @daisyaecw. "When I graduated, I was feeling [Photographs]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/Ccuper9ori6/?igsh=MTg1c3g3dThtY3oyYw
  35. Latour, B. (2018). Ou atterrir - comment s'orienter en politique [Down to earth: Politics in the new climate regime]. Polity Press.
  36. Lee, D. (n.d.). Manimals [Photograph]. Daniel Lee. http://www.daniellee.com/projects/manimals
  37. Lee, G. (1999). 몸 또는 욕망의 사다리 [Body or the ladder of desire]. Hangilsa.
  38. Lee, K., Park, S., & Kwon, M. (2009). Classic image classification by clothing design elements. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(1), 160-171.
  39. Lee, Y., & Yim, E. (2015). Representation of women in visual representation system of fashion photography structuralized by male gaze. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 23(6), 1038-1050. https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.6.1038
  40. Lim, S. H. (2019). A Study on aesthetics of transfiguration of body represented in modern art. Journal of Contemporary Art Studies, 23(2), 157-174. http://doi.org/10.29330/jcas.2019.12.23.2.157
  41. Liu, Y. (2023). Ecological thinking about the metaverse from a posthumanist perspective. Critical Arts, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2023.2276423
  42. Loh, J. (2021). 트랜스휴머니즘과 포스트휴머니즘 [Trans-und posthumanismus] (C. Choi, Trans.). Pusan National University Press. (Original work published 2018)
  43. Lum, H. C. (2011). Are we becoming superhuman cyborgs? How technomorphism influences our perceptions of the world around us [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Central Florida.
  44. Lum, H. C., Shelstad, W. J., Harris, M. H., & White, M. M. (2014, October 27-31). Human or superhuman: Individual differences in the perception of technomorphism [Conference session]. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581297
  45. Lynge-Jorlen, A. (2012). Between frivolity and art: Contemporary niche fashion magazines. Fashion Theory, 16(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112x13183318404104
  46. MacCafferty, G. (2015, August 13). The man with an ear on his arm. CNN travel. https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/stelarc-ear-arm-art/index.html
  47. Marcadent, S. (2022). Niche fashion magazines as micro societies. In C. R. Cardoso, & T. Holmes (Eds.), Transforming magazines: Rethinking the medium in the digital age (pp. 142-163). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  48. McMillan, K. (2023). Ryunosuke Okazaki: Fashion through the prism of posthuman and affect theories. In N. Sabatini, T. Sadaba, A. Tosi, V. Neri, & L. Cantoni (Eds.), Fashion communication in the digital age (pp. 165-175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38541-4_16
  49. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
  50. Nash, C. (1996). Reclaiming vision: Looking at landscape and the body. Gender, Place and Culture, 3(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699650021864
  51. Nero, I. (2004). Computers, cladding, and curves: The technomorphism of Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain (Publication No. 3157948) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
  52. Oettl, B. U. (n.d.). The artist's body in the age of genomic reproduction. Getty. https://www.getty.edu/publications/living-matter/snapshots/03/
  53. Ong, J. (2020, May 28). Berlin's contemporary c**t collective shine a light on drag syndrome in the latest issue of King Kong Garcon. It's Nice That. https://www.itsnicethat.com/articles/contemporary-cunt-collective-drag-syndrome-photography-publication-280520
  54. Pepperell, R. (1995). The post-human condition. Intellect books.
  55. Pepperell, R. (2005). Posthumans and extended experience. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 27-41.
  56. Science Gallery. (n.d.). May the horse live in me! https://dublin.sciencegallery.com/blood-1/may-the-horse-live-in-me-
  57. Science Meets Art. (n.d.-a). Hybrid 768 [Photograph]. http://gamma.library.temple.edu/sciencemeetsart/items/show/37
  58. Science Meets Art. (n.d.-b). Nature's little helpers: Bodyguard (for the golden helmeted honeyeater) [Photograph]. http://gamma.library.temple.edu/sciencemeetsart/items/show/91
  59. Shin, S. (2012). Transhumanism, the most dangerous idea in the world? Sogang Journal of Philosophy, 29, 189-217. https://doi.org/10.17325/sgjp.2012.29..189
  60. Shin, S., Lee, S., Lee, Y., Kim, A., Koo, B., Kim, J., Ha, D., & Song, E. (2020). 포스트휴먼이 몰려온다 [Posthuman is coming]. Acanet.
  61. Siebers, T. (Ed.). (2000). The body aesthetic: From fine art to body modification. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23061
  62. Smelik, A. (2021). A posthuman turn in fashion. In E. Paulicelli, V. Manlow, & E. Wissinger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to fashion studies (pp. 57-64). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264405-6
  63. Smelik, A. (2022). Fractal folds: The posthuman fashion of Iris van Herpen. Fashion Theory, 26(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2020.1850035
  64. Smith, T. (2019). Philosophy in the artworld: Some recent theories of contemporary art. Philosophies, 4(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4030037
  65. Taylor, S. R. (2018). The body is not an apology: The power of radical self-love. Barrett-Koehler Publishers.
  66. The Perfect Magazine [@theperfectmagazine]. (2021, April 1). Who are we? @jeanieus: 'One of my favourite images of the issue is one I styled. It's powerful and [Photographs]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CNIKE1vgyyY/?igsh=MjNuejUweTRocHd0
  67. Vanska, A. (2018). How to do humans with fashion: Towards a posthuman critique of fashion. International Journal of Fashion Studies, 5(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs.5.1.15_1
  68. Vrbos, M. (n.d.). King Kong [Photograph]. https://www.markovrbos.com/#/viii-flatiron-1/
  69. Wark, M. (1993). Lost in space: Into the digital image labyrinth. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 7(1), 140-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319309365594
  70. Warwick, K. (2016). Transhumanism: some practical possibilities. FifF Kommunikation, 2, 24-27. https://www.fiff.de/publikationen/fiff-kommunikation/fk-2016/fk-2016-2/fk-2016-2-content/fk-2-16-p24.pdf
  71. Wegenstein, B. (2007). Making room for the body: From fragmentation to mediation. In M. Flanagan, & A. Booth (Eds.), Re:skin (pp. 81-102). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5763.003.0008