Educational Technology International

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.393-431
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Strategy Instruction Types and Working Memory on English Reading Skills of Middle School Students

  • Yuyu GU (Korea University) ;
  • Hoisoo KIM (Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.06
  • 심사 : 2024.10.21
  • 발행 : 2024.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study investigates the efficacy of metacognitive strategy instruction and private speech promotion strategy instruction on the inferential and critical reading skills of middle school students, considering the role of working memory. While existing literature has established that general metacognitive strategies can enhance learning outcomes, such approaches may neglect content knowledge and inadvertently lead to a mechanistic application of strategies. Grounded in Vygotsky's cultural-historical theory, which posits that private speech plays an important role in cognitive development in subject matters, this research addresses a gap regarding the impact of private speech promotion on English reading comprehension. The study yielded several key findings. Firstly, students with higher working memory capacity demonstrated superior performance compared to their peers with lower working memory. Secondly, participants receiving strategy instruction exhibited significantly enhanced inferential and critical reading skills compared to those in a general instruction group. Notably, the private verbal facilitation strategy instruction group outperformed the metacognitive strategy instruction group in these areas. Finally, an interaction effect was observed between the types of strategy instruction and the visuospatial sketchpad's influence on critical reading skills.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students' reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063-1081.
  2. Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244.
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychological Review, 94(2), 192-210.
  4. Angelopoulou, E., & Drigas, A. (2021). Working memory, attention and their relationship: A theoretical overview. Research, Society and Development, 10(5), e46410515288.
  5. Archibald, L. M. (2017). Working memory and language learning: A review. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 33(1), 5-17.
  6. Baddeley, A. (1983). Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 302(1110), 311-324.
  7. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
  8. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(11), 417-423.
  9. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action (Vol. 45). Oxford University Press.
  10. Baddeley, A. (2017). Exploring working memory: Selected works of Alan Baddeley. Routledge.
  11. Baddeley, A., Logie, R., Bressi, S., Sala, S. D., & Spinnler, H. (1986). Dementia and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 38(4), 603-618.
  12. Basaraba, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: Do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist? Reading and writing, 26(3), 349-379.
  13. Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99-S107.
  14. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404-431.
  15. Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2017). Prologue: Reading comprehension is not a single ability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 73-76.
  16. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
  17. Chow, B. W. Y., Mo, J., & Dong, Y. (2021). Roles of reading anxiety and working memory in reading comprehension in English as a second language. Learning and Individual Differences, 92, 102092.
  18. Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42(1), 462-473.
  19. De Beni, R., & Moe, A. (2003). Presentation modality effects in studying passages. Are mental images always effective?. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 17(3), 309-324.
  20. Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students' critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100627.
  21. Engle R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
  22. Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2020). Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook. Psychology Press.
  23. Fathi, J., & Afzali, M. (2020). The Effect of Second Language Reading Strategy Instruction on Young Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 475-488.
  24. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Student and teacher perspectives on the usefulness of content literacy strategies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(4), 246-263.
  25. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
  26. Goldman, S. R., Snow, C., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Common themes in teaching reading for understanding: Lessons from three projects. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(3), 255-264.
  27. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological review, 101(3), 371.
  28. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.
  29. Inciarte-Gonzalez, A., Arvilla-Herrera, R., & Mier-Rodriguez, S. (2024). Contributions of Metacognitive Strategies to the Inferential Reading Comprehension Level. Kurdish Studies, 12(2), 5223-5239.
  30. Jones, J. S., Milton, F., Mostazir, M., & Adlam, A. R. (2020). The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Developmental science, 23(4), e12870.
  31. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological review, 99(1), 122.
  32. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 657-690.
  33. Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27.
  34. Kim, H. S (1994). Effects of Metacognition and Hypertext Structure on Performance in Authoring System Learning. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 32(5), 207-234.
  35. Kim, H. S., Yum, S. C., & Schallert, D. L. (2002). Effects of prior knowledge, working memory, and navigation tools on performance with hypertext. Journal of 112 Educational Technology, 18(1), 79-108.
  36. Kim. J. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2013). The effects of navigation methods and working memory on learning achievement and cognitive load in hypertext. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 19(1), 109-128.
  37. King, A. (2007). Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text. Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, 267-290.
  38. Koda, K. (2007). Reading and linguistic learning: crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-44.
  39. Li, P., & Clariana, R. B. (2019). Reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An integrative approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 94-105.
  40. Lidstone, J. S., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 438-451.
  41. Liu, J. (2023). Educational Implications of Private Speech for Children's Problem-solving Abilities. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1621-1627.
  42. Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing school failure: Alternative education for children and youth, 57(2), 77-92.
  43. Marboot, K., Roohani, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). Investigating Iranian EFL students' metacognitive online reading strategies, critical thinking, and their relationship: A mixed-methods study. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 151-182.
  44. Marvel, C. L., & Desmond, J. E. (2012). From storage to manipulation: how the neural correlates of verbal working memory reflect varying demands on inner speech. Brain and language, 120(1), 42-51.
  45. McNamara, D. S. (2021). If integration is the keystone of comprehension: Inferencing is the key. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 86-91.
  46. Meneghetti, C., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and individual differences, 16(4), 291-301.
  47. Mohseni Takaloo, N., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The effect of learners' motivation on their reading comprehension skill: A literature review. International journal of research in English education, 2(3), 10-21.
  48. Moore, P. J., & Scevak, J. J. (1994). Systematic forced processing of text and graphic information. In Advances in psychology. North-Holland, 108, 303-319.
  49. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., & Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 197-213.
  50. Nicolielo-Carriho, A. P., Crenitte, P. A. P., Lopes-Herrera, S. A., & Hage, S. R., de V. (2018). Relationship between phonological working memory, metacognitive skills and reading comprehension in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Oral Science: Revista FOB, 26, e20170414.
  51. O'brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in second language acquisition, 29(4), 557-581.
  52. O'Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  53. Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-century education. Reading research quarterly, 55, S267-S282.
  54. Quinn, J. G., & Ralston, G. E. (1986). Movement and attention in visual working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 38(4), 689-703.
  55. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of educational psychology, 97(1), 70.
  56. Saadatnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). Levels of reading comprehension across text types: A comparison of literal and inferential comprehension of expository and narrative texts in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 46, 1087-1099.
  57. Sadeghi, B., Hassani, M. T., & Rahmatkhah, M. (2014). The Relationship between EFL Learners. Metacognitive Strategies, and Their Critical Thinking. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 1167-1175.
  58. Salmon, A. K. (2008). Promoting a culture of thinking in the young child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(5), 457-461.
  59. Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.
  60. Swanson, H. L., & Trahan, M. (1996). Learning disabled and average readers' working memory and comprehension: does metacognition play a role?. British journal of educational psychology, 66(3), 333-355.
  61. Sweet, A. P., & Snow, C. E. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. Guilford Press.
  62. Tavakoli, H., & Koosha, M. (2016). The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian University EFL students. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didactica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 25(1), 119-133.
  63. Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 446-468.
  64. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104-132.
  65. Van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 521-529.
  66. Varol, B., & Ercetin, G. (2021). Effects of gloss type, gloss position, and working memory capacity on second language comprehension in electronic reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 820-844.
  67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
  68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
  69. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212.
  70. Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Springer.
  71. Werani, A. (2018). Inner speech and its impact on teaching and learning. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 136-151). Routledge.
  72. Willingham, D. T., & Lovette, G. (2014). Can reading comprehension be taught? In P. Afflerbach, M. Hurt, & B. Y. Cho (Eds.), Reading comprehension strategy instruction (pp. 98-118). Routledge.
  73. Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students' academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456-1479.
  74. Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 89-127). Routledge.