Educational Technology International

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.369-392
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Mediating Effect of Online Student's LMS Literacy Between Motivation and Online Teaching Effectiveness: Focusing on the Importance of Technology Literacy After COVID-19

  • JeongChul HEO (Chodang University) ;
  • Jongwook OH (Chodang University) ;
  • Eunchang NA (Chodang University) ;
  • Sumi HAN (Seoul Cyber University)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.02
  • 심사 : 2024.10.21
  • 발행 : 2024.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was to confirm whether students' evaluation of online teaching effectiveness (SEOTE) was significantly predicted by Instructional Material Motivation Survey (IMMS) and Literacy of Learning Management System (LLMS). It was also to examine whether LLMS had a significant mediating effect between IMMS and SEOTE. Pearson correlation, multiple-regression, and mediated regression analysis were used. Participants were online college students in South Korea. A total of 210 students meaningfully responded to the Google Drive web-survey via the internet of three scales: IMMS, LLMS, and SEOTE. This study revealed that motivation had a significant effect on SEOTE (r=.78, p<.01). There was a significant positive correlation between LLMS and SEOTE (r=.64, p<.01). In addition, motivation and LLMS were significant predictors that influenced the prediction of SEOTE. The overall model of IMMS and LLMS significantly predicted SEOTE, explaining 31.4% variance in SEOTE. This study used mediated regression analysis to determine whether there was a significant mediating effect of LLMS between IMMS and SEOTE. As LLMS was added between IMMS and SEOTE, the β coefficient of motivation was decreased. Models of IMMS and LLMS significantly influenced the prediction of SEOTE. LLMS showed a significant mediating effect by influencing the prediction of SEOTE by IMMS according to the method of Baron and Kenny (1986). Consequently, meaningful parameter of LLMS showed a significant indirect or mediating effect with IMMS in predicting SEOTE.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Chodang University's 2023 research grant for intramural research project.

참고문헌

  1. Academy Information Disclosure Center (2015). The state of dropout students in cyber colleges in 2015. Retrieved August 16, 2016 from http://www.academyinfo.go.kr/UIPISA/uipnh/unt/ipsrch/UntUntCprsSrchRdviewer.do 
  2. Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2021). Technology-based language learning: Investigation of digital technology and digital literacy. Sustainability, 13(21), 12304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112304 
  3. Bandura, R., & Leal, E. I. M. (2022). The digital literacy imperative. Center for Strategic & International Studies, 1-6. 
  4. Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217-232. 
  5. Bangert, A. W. (2008). The development and validation of the student evaluation of online teaching effectiveness. Computers in the Schools, 25, 25-47. 
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182. 
  7. Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-Gonzalez, M., & Casillas-Martin, S. (2020). Digital competences relationship between gender and generation of university professors. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 1. 205-211. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.1.10806 
  8. Buchem, H., Tur, G., & Hoelterhof, T. (2020). The role of learner control and psychological ownership for self-regulated learning in technology-enhanced learning designs. Differences in e-portfolio use in higher education study programs in Germany and Spain. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 45, 112-132. 
  9. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3-7. 
  10. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33. 
  11. Gunawan, I., Hui, L. K., Ma'sum, M. A., & Sukawati, N. N. (2020, October). Enhancing learning effectiveness by using online learning management system. In 2020 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET) (pp. 48-52). IEEE. 
  12. Heo, J., & Han, S. (2011). The college students' satisfaction related to expectation and interaction in the online counseling courses. Educational Technology International, 12(2), 117-134. 
  13. Irlbeck, S., & Mowat, J. (2007). Learning content management system (LCMS). In K. Harman & A. Koohang (Eds.), Learning Objects: Standards, Metadata, Repositories, and LCMS. (pp. 157-184). Informing Science Press. 
  14. Izhar, G., Wardani, K., & Nugraha, N. K. (2022). The development environmental literacy media learning for elementary school student. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 397-404. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.116 
  15. Jeon, G. (2010). The effects of an e-learning information literacy instruction program on self-directed learning ability of university students. [Master's thesis]. University of Soongsil. 
  16. Jeon, Y., Kim, K., & Cho, J. (2016). A study on the effect of LMS on the self-regulated learning competency and learning satisfaction in higher education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 22(1), 55-84. 
  17. Kasimoglu, S., Bahcelerli, N. M., & Celik, M. U. (2022). Digital literacy during COVID-19 distance education; evaluation of communication-based problems in line with student opinions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-6. 
  18. Keller, J. M. (1993). Manual for instructional materials motivational survey (IMMS).
  19. Lalduhawma, L. P., Thangmarwia, L., & Hussain, J. (2022). Effectiveness of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mizoram. Journal of Education and eLearning Research, 9(3), 175-183. 
  20. Marin, V. I. (2022). Student-centered learning in higher education in terms of Covid-19: A critical analysis. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.be17c279 
  21. Marnita, M., Nurdin, D., & Prihatin, E. (2023). The Effectiveness of elementary teacher digital literacy competence on teacher learning management. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(1), 35-43. 
  22. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit -a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2, 130-136. 
  23. Ministry of Education (2020). Responding to COVID-19: Online classes in Korea. https://kosis.kr/files/covid/Responding_to_COVID19_ONLINE_CLASSES_IN_KOREA.pdf 
  24. Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy, Computers & Education, 82, 11-25. 
  25. Mtani, H. & Mbelwa, J. (2022). Factors affecting learning management system usage in higher learning institutions in Tanzania: A Case of university of Dodoma. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 18(1), 7-26. 
  26. Muntu, D. F., Yuliana, O. Y., & Tarigan. Z. J. (2023). The influence of digital literacy on learning effectiveness through classroom management: Moderating effect IT infrastructure. PETRA IJBS, 6(1), 42-52. 
  27. Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., Surahman, E., & Ridwan, I. M. (2021, June 12). Digital literacy and cognitive abilities of preservice physics teacher in physics for school course using LMS3: How are the both correlated? [Conference session]. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, Bandung, Indonesia. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012011/pdf 
  28. Saiyad, S., Virk, A., Mahajan, R., & Singh, T. (2020). Online teaching in medical training: Establishing good online teaching practices from cumulative experience. International Journal of Applied Basic Medical Research, 10(3). 149-155. 
  29. Shin, M. & Hickey, K. (2020). Needs a little TLC: Examining college students' emergency remote teaching and learning experiences during COVID-19. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 973-986. 
  30. Smith, Y., Chen, Y., & Warner-Stidham, A. (2021). Understanding online teaching effectiveness: Nursing student and faculty perspectives. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(5), 785-794. 
  31. Suresh, K. D. (2024). eLearning trends that will shape learning initiatives in 2024. Retrieved May 16, 2024 from https://elearningindustry.com/elearning-trendsthat-will-shape-learning-initiatives-in-2024 
  32. Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital Literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment?. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 14(1), 54-65. 
  33. Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 215-221. 
  34. Terra, J. (2023). What is technology literacy?: Everything you need to know. Retrieved April 27, 2023 from http://www.simplilearn.com/what-istechnology-literacy-article 
  35. Vaataja, J. O., & Ruokamo, H. (2021). Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395 
  36. Vipin, H. (2023). The future of education: 5 eLearning trends to keep an eye on in 2024. Retrieved May 16, 2024 from https://elearningindustry.com/future-ofeducation-elearning-trends-to-keep-an-eye-on-in-2024 
  37. Wang, C., Zhang, Y., & Cheon, S. (2021). The empirical study of college students' elearning effectiveness and its antecedents toward the COVID-19 epidemic environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-14.