한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information)

  • 제29권10호
  • /
  • Pages.185-195
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1598-849X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9945(eISSN)
한국컴퓨터정보학회 (Korean Society of Computer Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Visitor Engagement of the Audio Guide and Curating-bot at Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art

  • Bo-A Rhee (College of Art & Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Ye-Eun Seo (Department of Art and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yeon-U Ro (Department of Art and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Gyu-Hyun Kim (The graduate School of Advanced Imaging Science, Immersive Media/Animation Contents, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.02
  • 심사 : 2024.10.02
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국립현대미술관 디지털 서비스의 사용자 경험을 비교 평가하는 구조적 틀을 제안했다. 모바일 앱과 큐레이팅 봇의 효율성, 지원 기능, 혁신적 속성 등을 평가하며, 특히 실용적 품질(PQ)과 쾌락적 자극(HS)에 중점을 두었다. 본 연구는 설문조사를 통해 수집된 관람객의 디지털 서비스에 대한 이용 경험 데이터, 그리고 이 데이터를 기반으로 한 가설 검증을 통해 모바일 앱과 큐레이팅 봇 등 두 가지의 디지털 서비스가 전시만족도와 몰입도에 미치는 영향을 분석했다. 연구팀은 본 연구를 통해 미술관 디지털 서비스 평가에 대한 기술수용모델(TAM)과 박물관의 품질-가치-충성도(QVL) 연계 모델의 적합성과 상술한 서비스의 관람 경험에 대한 영향력을 입증했다.

In this paper, we propose a comparative evaluation framework for digital services in the Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, focusing on user experience analysis of both mobile apps and curating-bots. Our method assesses the efficiency, support, and innovative attributes of these services, particularly regarding their Pragmatic Quality (PQ) and Hedonic Stimulation (HS). The proposed framework combines empirical user engagement data via survey with hypothesis testing to determine the influences of digital services such as the mobile app and curating-bot on visitor satisfaction and immersion. The research team demonstrates the suitability of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Quality-Value-Loyalty (QVL) Chain in evaluating digital services in the art museum context and the impact of these services on the visitor experiences.

키워드

과제정보

This research was conducted as part of the 2023 Cultural Technology R&D Project supported by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and the Korea Creative Content Agency (Project title: Development of 3D Precision Information Acquisition and Authoring Technology for Ultra-High Precision Cultural Heritage Restoration of Microstructures, Project number: RS-2023-00227749, Contribution rate: 100%).

참고문헌

  1. Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, "2021 MMCA Annual Report," Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea, 2021.
  2. T. Laine, S. Islas, C., M. Vinni, and M. Joy, "Characteristics of pervasive learning environments in museum contexts," in Proceeding of 8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mlearn 2009), Metcalf, A. Hamilton & C. Graffeo, University of Central Florida, pp. 26-30 October 2009.
  3. B.A. Rhee, and Y.S. Choi, "Using mobile technology for enhancing museum experience: Case studies of museum mobile applications in S. Korea," International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 39-44, October 2015. DOI: 10.14257/ijmue.2015.10.6.05
  4. A.M. Velentza, D., Heinke, and J. Wyatt, "Museum robot guides or conventional audio guides? An experimental study," Advanced Robotics, Vol. 34, No. 24, pp. 1571-1580. December 2020. DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2020.1854113
  5. M. Park, "Lee Kun-hee Collection Masterpieces of Korean arts: Its significance and analysis of key works," 2021 MMCA Studies: Exhibition Histories, p. 192-211. Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea, 2021.
  6. Korea Culture Information Service Agency(KCISA), Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Korea Culture Information Service Agency and the Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, https://www.kcisa.kr/kr/board/event/boardView.do?bbsIdx=7016
  7. F. Del Duchetto, P. Baxter, and M. Hanheide, "Lindsey the tour guide robot-usage patterns in a museum long-term deployment," In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): pp. 1-8, October 2019. DOI: 10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956329
  8. S. Rizvic, B. Mijatovic, D. Boskovic, and I. Ivkovic-Kihic, "Workflow of extended reality applications for museum exhibitions," In 2022 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom), pp. 189-194. August 2022. DOI: 10.1109/BalkanCom55633.2022.9900866
  9. U.S. Elesini, M. Hlede., D. Kristan, A. Korosec, E. Protic, A. Ucakar, and J. Rugelj, "Mobile serious game for enhancing user experience in museum," ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 1-26. 2022. DOI: 10.1145/3569088
  10. K. Agustini, D.S. Wahyuni, I.N.E. Mertayasa, N.M. Ratminingsih, and G. Ariadi, "The effect of augmented reality mobile application on visitor impact mediated by rational hedonism: Evidence from Subak Museum," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 77-88. January 2023. DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140109
  11. B.A. Rhee, "Potentials and Challenges of the Usability of Art Museum Mobile Applications," Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 20, No.4, pp. 103-110. April 2015. DOI: 10.9708/JKSCI.2015.20.4.103
  12. B.A. Rhee, "A comparative study on the usability evaluation ofmuseum smart phone applications in pre-visit setting," Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 103-110. March 2013. DOI: 10.9708/jksci.2013.18.3.069
  13. N.Z. Jia, A.K. Tarofder, A. K., and A. Ahmad, "Investigating Critical Effect of China Palace Museum's Social Media Service Quality on Visitor's Satisfaction," Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 1-26, April 2023. DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.1600
  14. U. Maniscalco, A. Minutolo, P. Storniolo, and M. Esposito, "Towards a more anthropomorphic interaction with robots in museum settings: An experimental study," Robobotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 171, 104561. October 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2023.104561, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889023002002
  15. M. Bennewitz, F. Faber, D. Joho, M. Schreiber, and S. Behnke, "Towards a humanoid museum guide robot that interacts with multiple persons," In 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 418-423, December 2005. DOIi: 10.1109/ICHR.2005.1573603
  16. S. Rosa, M. Randazzo, E. Landini, S. Bernagozzi, G. Sacco, M. Piccinino, and L. Natale, "Tour guide robot: a 5G-enabled robot museum guide," Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10, pp. 1-18, January 2024. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1323675
  17. Umam, F., Adiputra, F., Dafid, A., & Wahyuni, S. "Autonomous museum tour guide robot with object detection using tensorflow learning machine," In 2022 IEEE 8th Information Technology International Seminar, pp. 274-281. October 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ITIS57155.2022.10009997
  18. K. Ichihara, T. Hasegawa, H. Ichikawa, and Y. Naruse, "Waypoint-based human-tracking navigation for museum guide robot,"Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 1192-1204. February 2022. DOI: 10.20965/jrm.2022.p1192
  19. J. Park, J. Kim, D.Y. Kim, J. Kim, M.G. Kim, J. Choi, and W. Lee, "User Perception on Personalized Explanation by Science Museum Docent Robot," In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: pp. 973-975. March 2022. DOI: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889654
  20. B. Hanussek, "Enhanced exhibitions? discussing museum apps after a decade of development," Advances in Archaeological Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 206-212. October 2020. DOI: 10.1017/AAP.2020.10
  21. H. Sodre, P. Moraes, M. Rodriguez, V. Castelli, P. Barboza, M. Mattos, and R. Grando, "Aplicacion de Robots Humanoides como Guias Interactivos en Museos: Una Simulacion con el Robot NAO," arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.17060, November 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2310.17060
  22. Z.R. Chen, "The Museum Guidance System in Gamification Design," In Proceedings of HCI International 2020-Posters: 22nd International Conference, Denmark, pp. 278-285. July 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_37
  23. V. Venkatesh, and F.D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, Vol. 46, No.2, pp. 186-204. February 2000. DOI: 10.1287/MNSC.46.2.186.11926
  24. F.D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-339. September 1989. DOI: 10.2307/249008
  25. C. M. Hsieh, T. P. Chen, C. J. Hsieh, and B. K. Tsai, "Moderating effect of membership status on the quality-value-loyalty chain at museums," Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 107-126, January 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.4073
  26. C. Anton, C. Camarero, and M.J. Garrido, "Exploring the experience value of museum visitors as a co-creation process," Current issues in Tourism, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1406-1425, December 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
  27. B.J. Pine, and J.H. Gilmore, "The Experience Economy: Competing for Customer Time, Attention, and Money," Harvard Business Review Press, US, 2019.
  28. Museums Association, "It's time for museums to address mental health," https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/analysis/2022/11/its-time-for-museums-to-address-mental-health/.
  29. MuseumNext, "Are museums good for your mental health?," https://www.museumnext.com/article/are-museums-good-for-your-mental-health/.
  30. F.J. Saavedra-Macias, S. Arias-Sanchez, and A. Rodriguez-Gomez, "Promoting Mental Health Recovery in a Contemporary Art Museum," Painting (Arts for Health), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 85-100, August 2023. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-80455-352-720231007
  31. J.M. Goodman-Casanova, J. Guzman-Parra, F.J. Duran-Jimenez, M. Garcia-Gallardo, D. Cuesta-Lozano, and F. Mayoral-Cleries, "Effectiveness of museum-based participatory arts in mental health recovery," International journal of mental health nursing, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1416-1428, October 2023. DOI: 10.1111/inm.13186
  32. A. Altieri, S. Ceccacci, L. Giraldi, A. Leopardi, M. Mengoni, and A. Talipu, "Affective guide for Museum: a system to suggest museum paths based on visitors' emotions," International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 521-532, July 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_35
  33. M. Hassenzahl, The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product, Funology 2: from usability to enjoyment, p. 301-313. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., US, 2018.
  34. B.A. Rhee, and J.S. Kim, "Mediation Between Digital Surrogates and Viewers Based on the Technology Acceptance Model," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 96, No. 6, pp. 1668-1679. March 2018. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol96No6/19Vol96No6.pdf.
  35. J. S. Baek, and B.A. Rhee, "A Study on the Impact of the Suitability for Technology on Viewing Experience with Digital Exhibition Using Projection Mapping Technology," Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Special Issue on Advances in Mechanical System and ICT-convergence 1: pp. 163-172, October 2019. DOI: 10.17654/HMSI119163
  36. R. Hammady, M. Minhua., Z. Al-Kalha, and C. Strathearn, "A framework for constructing and evaluating the role of MR as a holographic virtual guide in museums," Virtual Reality, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 895-918, January 2021. DOI: 10.1007/S10055-020-00497-9
  37. M.K. Othman, H. Petrie, and C. Power, "Engaging visitors in museums with technology: scales for the measurement of visitor and multimedia guide experience," In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2011: 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, pp. 92-99, September 2011. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_8
  38. M. Hassenzahl, "Prioritizing usability problems: Data-driven and judgement-driven severity estimates," Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 29-42, November 2010. DOI: 10.1080/014492900118777
  39. M. Hassenzahl, "The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products," Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 319-349, December 2004. DOI: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1904_2
  40. Google Survey, https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1kO8bG1XwtluMGupQCMivWGCbuw10S13Eny0PX6N6ZTM/edit
  41. L. Fang, J. Sun, and Y. Liu, "Research on the Quality Control Method of Cultural Heritage Digital Information Service: A Case Study of the Digital Cultural Relics Library Platform of the Palace Museum in Beijing," Library Trends, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 550-572, May 2023. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2023.a927953
  42. J. Silvennoinen, M. Vogel, and S. Kujala, "Experiencing visual usability and aesthetics in two mobile application contexts," Journal of usability studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 46-62. November 2014. DOI: 10.5555/2817310.2817314
  43. S.A. Perrig., D. Ueffing, K. Opwis, and F. Bruhlmann, "Smartphone app aesthetics influence users' experience and performance," Frontiers in Psychology, Vo1. 14, pp. 1-18, June 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113842