DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technology Acceptance Model for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Service

소비자대상직접시행 유전자검사서비스의 기술수용모델

  • Hyunjin Choi (Graduate School of Business, Hanyang University) ;
  • Daecheol Kim (School of Business, Hanyang University)
  • 최현진 (한양대학교 대학원 경영대학) ;
  • 김대철 (한양대학교 경영대학)
  • Received : 2024.08.05
  • Accepted : 2024.08.25
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence consumers' acceptance intentions towards Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing service. DTC genetic testing service can be considered in two aspects: the application of new technology in genetic testing customers can directly purchase and the services for receiving the test results customer can't directly analyze. Existing technology-based acceptance models have difficulty fully explaining consumers' acceptance intentions towards DTC genetic testing services. Therefore, this study aims to propose a new acceptance model considering these two characteristics. A survey was conducted with 377 potential consumers for this research. The analysis revealed that health interest, prior knowledge, subjective norms, innovativeness, perceived usefulness, and perceived value affect consumers' acceptance intentions. The results obtained through this study can help establish strategies and marketing plans necessary for the diffusion of services, such as DTC genetic testing services, that combine a new technology and a service. In the long term, the accumulated DTC genetic testing results data can contribute to the development of national genetic information infrastructure and preventive medical applications, as well as improve individuals' quality of life.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179-211.
  2. Baek, N.G., A Study on Effect of The Subscription - Based Online Service on Consumer Perception Value, Repurchase Intention, Korea Customer Satisfaction Management Association, 2021, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 49-71.
  3. Bagozzi, R.P., Youjae, Y., and Phillips, L.W., Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 421-458.
  4. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude, MIS Quarterly, 1994, Vol. 18, pp. 59-82.
  5. Beck, S.Y., Factors affecting Adoption Intention of Autonomous Vehicle, Journal of Venture Innovation, 2022, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 91-108.
  6. Bian, D., Xiao, Y., Song, K., Dong, M., Li, L., Millar, R., Shi, C., and Li, G., Determinants Influencing the Adoption of Internet Health Care Technology Among Chinese Health Care Professionals: Extension of the Value-Based Adoption Model With Burnout Theory, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2023, Vol. 25, p. e37671.
  7. Cimperman, M., M., Brencic, M., and Trkman, P., Analyzing older users' home telehealth services acceptance behavior-applying an Extended UTAUT model, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2016, Vol. 90, pp. 22-31.
  8. Chung, N.H., Han, H.J., and Gretzel, U., The Determinants of Perceived Value and Information Sharing Satisfaction in the Online Travel Communities: Personal Innovativeness, Innovation Resistance, and Technicality, Korea Customer Satisfaction Management Association, 2014, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 43-63.
  9. Davis F.D., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 1989, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340.
  10. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R., User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 1989, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
  11. Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H.B., A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 629-636.
  12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 39-50.
  14. French, J. and Raven, B., The bases of social power, Studies in social power/Institute for Social Research, 1959, Vol. 6, pp. 151-164.
  15. Green, R.C. and Farahany, N.A., The FDA is overcautious on consumer genomics, Nature, 2014, Vol. 505, No. 7483, pp. 286-287.
  16. Group, P.G.S., Ostergren, J.E., Gornick, M.C., Carere, D.A., Kalia, S.S., Uhlmann, W.R., Ruffin, M.T., Mountain, J.L, Green, R.C., and Robert, S., How Well Do Customers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing Services Comprehend Genetic Test Results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study, Public Health Genomics, 2015, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 216.
  17. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, M., PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2011, Vol. 19, No. 2, p. 139.
  18. Jayanti, R. and Jackson, A., Service Satisfaction; An Exploratory Investigation of Three Models, Advances in Consumer Research, 1991, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 603-610.
  19. Joseph, B. and Vyas, S.J., Concurrent Validity of a Measure of Innovative Cognitive Style, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1984, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 159-175.
  20. Kim, D.B. and NamKung, Y., The effect of Fast Food Consumers' Perceived Usefulness and Security Risk toward Self-Service Kiosk on Perceived Value and Behavioral Intention: Value based Adoption Model (VAM), Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea, 2019, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 307-337.
  21. Kim, E.J. and Moon, I.O., A Study on Middle Aged People's Compliance for Preventive Health Behavior or Cancer, The Journal of Korea Society for Health Education, 1987, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 9-31.
  22. Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C., and Gupta, S., Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems, 2007, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 111-126.
  23. Kim, I.Y., The latest trend in personalized services using DTC genes, BRIC View, 2021, Vol. T29, pp. 1-17.
  24. Kim, M.J. and Lee, S.B., The Effect of the Perceived Cost on Perceived Value and Innovation Resistance in the Mobile Convergence Environment: Focused on Delivery Application Users in the Food Industry, The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 2018, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 247-264.
  25. Lee, H.M., Han, J.W., and Lee, I.Y., Predicting Consumption Behavior of Sport O2O Service in Korea and China: Applying Value-based Adoption Model (VAM), The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 2022, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 1-17.
  26. Lee, R.S. and Cho, M.H., The Roles of Information Value, Information Sense, and Prior Knowledge in Relation to the Type of Restaurant Smart Phone Application Contents, The Tourism Sciences Society of Korea, 2016, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 31-53.
  27. Lee, S.Y., Kim, I.H., and Jang, J.H., A Study on the Relationship between Health Concern and Purchase Behavior of the Environmental Friendly Agricultural Products, The Korean Association For Local Government & Administration Studies, 2011, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 77-100.
  28. Lin, T.C., Wu, S., Hsu, J.S.C., and Chou, Y.C., The integration of value-based adoption and expectation-confirmation models: An example of IPTV continuance intention, Decision Support Systems, 2012, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 63-75.
  29. Mathieson, K., Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior, Information Systems Research, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 173-191.
  30. Midgley, D.F. and Dowling, G.R., Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 1978, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 229-242.
  31. Park, H.J., A Study on Effects of LCC Prior knowledge and Selection Attributes on Behavioral Intention of University Students, Korea Tourism Research Association, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 75-98.
  32. Park, I.S. and Jung, I.Y.Z., A Study on Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Intentions and Purposes in Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Test, Journal of Digital Convergence, 2019, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 167-177.
  33. Park, S. and Kim. C.J., Incorporating the Ethical Concerns of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Employee Education, Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-41.
  34. Rice, R.E. and Aydin, C., Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 219.
  35. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations, fifth ed., New York: Free Press, 2003.
  36. Ryoo, S., Kim, H., and Jeon, S., An Empirical Study on Mobile Web Browsing Service Adoption in Korea, Eighth International Conference on Mobile Business, 2009, p. 324.
  37. Shin, S.W. and Shin, G.C., A Study on the Effect of Enhancer and Inhibitor on the Resistance and Use Intention of Online Used Trading Platform: Focusing on the Dual Factory Theory, Information Systems Review, 2022, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 125-155.
  38. Stewart, K.F.J., Wesselius, A., Schreurs, M.A.C., Schols, A.M.W.J., and Zeegers, M.P., Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Community Genetics, 2018, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-18.
  39. Vasli, P., Shekarian-Asl, Z., Zarmehrparirouy, M., and Hosseini, M., The predictors of COVID-19 preventive health behaviors among adolescents: The role of health belief model and health literacy, Journal of Public Health, 2022, Vol. 32, pp. 157-166.
  40. Venkatech, V. and Davis, F.D., A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 2000, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.
  41. Warshaw, P.R., A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to Fishbein, Journal of Marketing Research, 1980, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 153-172.
  42. Yoo, Y.J., Choi, H.Y., and Lee, M.K., Effects of Perceived Risk on Medical Tourists Hesitation: Moderating Effects of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Control, Landscape and Geography, 2010, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 111-119.
  43. Yun, S.U., A Study on the Acceptance Decision Factor of IPTV, Journal of Communication Science, 2009, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 162-197.
  44. Yun, S.S. and Jeon, D.H., The effect of consumers' perceived ease and usefulness of using delivery applications on perceived value, satisfaction, and trust: Focusing on the expanded technology acceptance model, Food Service Industry Journal, 2022, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 257-269.
  45. Zekun, Z., User Acceptance of Mobile Healthcare Applications: An Integrated Model of UTAUT and HBM Theory, Korean Association for Policy Sciences, 2015, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 203-236.