Journal of Gastric Cancer

  • 제24권4호
  • /
  • Pages.420-435
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2093-582X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-5641(eISSN)
대한위암학회 (The Korean Gastric Cancer Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy

  • Ji-Hyeon Park (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Hyuk-Joon Lee (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • JeeSun Kim (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Yo-Seok Cho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Sunjoo Lee (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Seongmin Park (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Hwinyeong Choe (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Eunhwa Song (Department of Food Service and Nutrition Care, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Youngran Kim (Department of Food Service and Nutrition Care, Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) Seoul National University (SNU) Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Seong-Ho Kong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Do Joong Park (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Byung-Ho Nam (HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Research) ;
  • Han-Kwang Yang (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.17
  • 심사 : 2024.08.17
  • 발행 : 2024.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility and effectiveness of digital therapeutics for supportive care after gastrectomy. Materials and Method: The study included 39 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy and were able to use a mobile application (app) on their smartphones. The developed research app automatically calculates and provides daily targets for calorie and protein intake based on the patient's body mass index (BMI). Patients recorded their daily diets, weights, and symptoms in the app and completed special questionnaires to assess the feasibility of the app in real-world clinical practice. Results: At the 10-week follow-up, the mean questionnaire scores for ease of learning, usability, and effectiveness of the app (primary endpoint) were 2.32±0.41, 2.35±0.43, and 2.4±0.39 (range: 0-3), respectively. Patients were classified as underweight (<18.5, n=4), normal (18.5-24.9, n=24), or overweight (≥25.0, n=11) according to predischarge BMI. Underweight patients showed higher compliance with app usage and a higher rate of achieving the target calorie and protein intake than normal weight and overweight patients (98% vs. 77% vs. 81%, p=0.0313; 102% vs. 75% vs. 61%, P=0.0111; 106% vs. 79% vs. 64%, P=0.0429). Two patients transitioned from underweight to normal weight (50.0%), one patient (4.3%) transitioned from normal weight to underweight, and two patients (22.2%) transitioned from overweight to normal weight. Conclusions: The mobile app is feasible and useful for postoperative supportive care in terms of ease of learning, usability, and effectiveness. Digital therapeutics may be an effective way to provide supportive care for postgastrectomy patients, particularly in terms of nutrition.

키워드

과제정보

We are deeply grateful to all members of the gastrointestinal surgical team at Seoul National University Hospital and HERINGS for their efforts in this study.

참고문헌

  1. Davis JL, Selby LV, Chou JF, Schattner M, Ilson DH, Capanu M, et al. Patterns and predictors of weight loss after gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1639-1645.
  2. Na JR, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lim JH, Ju DL, Yang HK, et al. A prospective observational study evaluating the change of nutritional status and the incidence of dumping syndrome after gastrectomy. J Clin Nutr 2014;6:59-70.
  3. Park JH, Kim E, Seol EM, Kong SH, Park DJ, Yang HK, et al. Prediction model for screening patients at risk of malnutrition after gastric cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:4471-4481.
  4. Park JH, Kong SH, Park DJ, Yang HK, Kim JW, Park KB, et al. Development and internal/external validation of a prediction model for weight loss following gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study. Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2022;14:55-65.
  5. Lee HO, Han SR, Choi SI, Lee JJ, Kim SH, Ahn HS, et al. Effects of intensive nutrition education on nutritional status and quality of life among postgastrectomy patients. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016;90:79-88.
  6. Yu Y, Li M, Kang R, Liu X, Wang N, Zhu Q, et al. The effectiveness of telephone and internet-based supportive care for patients with esophageal cancer on enhanced recovery after surgery in China: a randomized controlled trial. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022;9:217-228.
  7. Wang C, Lee C, Shin H. Digital therapeutics from bench to bedside. NPJ Digit Med 2023;6:38.
  8. Soh JY, Cha WC, Chang DK, Hwang JH, Kim K, Rha M, et al. Development and validation of a multidisciplinary mobile care system for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: interventional observation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6:e115.
  9. Denis F, Yossi S, Septans AL, Charron A, Voog E, Dupuis O, et al. Improving survival in patients treated for a lung cancer using self-evaluated symptoms reported through a web application. Am J Clin Oncol 2017;40:464-469.
  10. Oh B, Cho B, Han MK, Choi H, Lee MN, Kang HC, et al. The effectiveness of mobile phone-based care for weight control in metabolic syndrome patients: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e83.
  11. Wu JM, Ho TW, Chang YT, Hsu C, Tsai CJ, Lai F, et al. Wearable-based mobile health app in gastric cancer patients for postoperative physical activity monitoring: focus group study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7:e11989.
  12. Agboola S, Kamdar M, Flanagan C, Searl M, Traeger L, Kvedar J, et al. Pain management in cancer patients using a mobile app: study design of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2014;3:e76.
  13. Semple JL, Sharpe S, Murnaghan ML, Theodoropoulos J, Metcalfe KA. Using a mobile app for monitoring post-operative quality of recovery of patients at home: a feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e18.
  14. Yun YH, Park YS, Lee ES, Bang SM, Heo DS, Park SY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 2004;13:863-868.
  15. Bae JM, Kim S, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Noh JH, et al. Health-related quality of life among disease-free stomach cancer survivors in Korea. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1587-1596.
  16. Eom BW, Lee J, Lee IS, Son YG, Ryu KW, Kim SG, et al. Development and validation of a symptom-focused quality of life questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy. Cancer Res Treat 2021;53:763-772.
  17. Kinoshita T. Minimally invasive approaches for early gastric cancer in East Asia: current status and future perspective. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:20.
  18. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:506-513.
  19. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 2019;270:983-991.
  20. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, et al. A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:214-222.
  21. Park DJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Ryu KW, Han SU, Kim HH, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (the KLASS-04 trial). Br J Surg 2021;108:1043-1049.
  22. Lim HS, Lee B, Cho I, Cho GS. Nutritional and clinical factors affecting weight and fat-free mass loss after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Nutrients 2020;12:1905.
  23. Kim H, Suh EE, Lee HJ, Yang HK. The effects of patient participation-based dietary intervention on nutritional and functional status for patients with gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs 2014;37:E10-E20.
  24. Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e287.
  25. Aapro M, Bossi P, Dasari A, Fallowfield L, Gascon P, Geller M, et al. Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives. Support Care Cancer 2020;28:4589-4612.
  26. Makin S. The emerging world of digital therapeutics. Nature 2019;573:S106-S109.
  27. Choi MJ, Kim H, Nah HW, Kang DW. Digital therapeutics: emerging new therapy for neurologic deficits after stroke. J Stroke 2019;21:242-258.
  28. Davis JL, Ripley RT. Postgastrectomy syndromes and nutritional considerations following gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2017;97:277-293.
  29. Wang CJ, Suh YS, Lee HJ, Park JH, Park SH, Choi JH, et al. Postoperative quality of life after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal observation study. Ann Surg Treat Res 2022;103:19-31.
  30. Choi JH, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Park JM, et al. The pattern of postoperative quality of life following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort from Korean multicenter robotic gastrectomy trial. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020;99:275-284.
  31. Kobayashi D, Kodera Y, Fujiwara M, Koike M, Nakayama G, Nakao A. Assessment of quality of life after gastrectomy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22. World J Surg 2011;35:357-364.
  32. Lee JH, Lee HJ, Choi YS, Kim TH, Huh YJ, Suh YS, et al. Postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy compared with partial gastrectomy: longitudinal evaluation by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-OG25 and STO22. J Gastric Cancer 2016;16:230-239.