Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study on Academic Librarians' Perception of Predatory Journals

대학도서관 사서의 부실 의심 학술지 인식에 대한 탐색적 연구

  • Myoung-A Hong ;
  • Wonsik Shim
  • 홍명아 (성균관대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 심원식 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.08.14
  • Accepted : 2024.09.10
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The emergence of Open Access (OA) and other changes to the academic publishing ecosystem have made the prevalence of predatory journals a significant concern. Academic librarians play a crucial role in the academic environment that protects researchers and takes action against predatory journals. Nonetheless, there isn't many research that looks into how academic librarians view and handle predatory journals. This study aims to give an exploratory analysis of the overall perceptions of predatory journals among university librarians in South Korea. A survey was administered to academic librarians between April 10 and May 1, 2024, and 78 respondents' answers were examined. The findings demonstrate that opinions among South Korean academic librarians on predatory journals are not all uniform. Based on their readiness and willingness to supply services, the respondents could be roughly categorized into four groups, according to cluster analysis. The study affirms that training librarians and improving cooperation between academic libraries and researchers are critical prerequisites for the advancement of services aimed at predatory publications. We anticipate that this study, which is the first of its type to explore how academic librarians in South Korea see predatory journals, will be a valuable starting point for university libraries as they plan and offer services related to predatory journals in the future.

OA 출판의 확산과 더불어 학술생태계에 큰 변화가 나타났고 그 중심에 부실 학술지 이슈가 있다. 대학도서관 사서들은 부실 학술지 문제에 대응하고 연구자를 지원하는 학술생태계의 중요한 구성 요소 중 하나이다. 그러나 국내외에서 대학도서관 사서들이 실제로 부실 학술지를 어떻게 인식하고 있는지에 대한 연구는 거의 없다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 연구는 국내의 대학도서관 사서들이 부실 학술지에 대해 어떤 인식을 가지고 있는지를 파악하고자 하는 탐색적 연구를 수행하였다. 이를 위해 대학도서관 사서들을 대상으로 2024년 4월 10일부터 5월 1일까지 설문조사를 실시하였고 총 78명의 응답을 수집하였다. 계량적인 데이터 분석 결과, 국내의 대학도서관 사서들은 부실 학술지와 관련해 다양한 인식 수준을 가지고 있었으며, 군집분석 결과 서비스 준비 및 의향 측면에서 잠정적으로 4개의 집단으로 구분되는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대학도서관이 부실 학술지 관련 서비스를 제공하기 위해서는 도서관과 연구자 간의 협력 강화 및 사서들에 대한 재교육이 중요함을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 국내 대학도서관 사서들을 대상으로 부실 학술지에 대한 인식을 파악하고자 한 최초의 연구로서 학문적 의의를 가지며, 향후 대학도서관이 부실 학술지 관련 서비스를 제공하는데 중요한 기초자료가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, Hye Rhan & Kim, Jeong A (2017). A study on the job nurnout of medical librarians in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.1.245 
  2. Hong, Myoung-A & Shim, Won Sik (2024). A study on the perception of predatory journals among members of the Korea researcher communities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 41(2), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2024.41.2.097 
  3. Joung, Kyoung Hee (2012). A study on the roles of academic libraries for open access journal publishing: Focusing on the academic libraries participated in COPE. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.045 
  4. Kim, Soon (2019). University library's new research support service focusing on scholarly communication in open science era. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.1.007 
  5. Lee, Byung-Ryul & Lee, Jongsoo (2018). Spot survey for fostering online publication journal only. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, 32(3), 41-69. http://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2018.32.3.41 
  6. Lee, Eun Jee, Kim, Hyesun, Nam, Eunkyung, & Kim, Wan Jong (2020). A study on the development of checklist for identifying the predatory journals published abroad. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(4), 109-130. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.4.109 
  7. Lee, hyobin, Kim, Haedo, Kim, So-hyeong, Chun, Gi-Woo, & Shin, Jeongbeom (2019). Key Features and Preventive Measures of Poor Academic Activities(ISSUE REPORT No. 2019-1). Daejeon: National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF). 
  8. Lee, In Jae (2022). Preventing submissions to fake and predatory journals and conferences. Appraisal Studies, 21(3), 191-208. 
  9. Lee, Jongwook, Park, Joong Kyu, Choi, Jae Hwang, & Kwak, Do Won (2019). Determinants of Academic Information Resources on National Research Competitiveness. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service. 
  10. Lee, Sun-Ae (2024). Empirical meanings and dilemmas of the profession of an academic librarian: Applying Giorgi's phenomenological method. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 41(2), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2024.41.2.353 
  11. Lee, Yong Jae & Lee, Ji-Wook (2020). A study on the present stage of research support services of academic library in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(1), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.1.202003.305 
  12. Noh, Younghee (2023). A research on misconceptions and understanding regarding Open Access journals and predatory journals. Korean Comparative Government Review, 27(3), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.18397/kcgr.2023.27.3.213. 
  13. Noh, Younghee, Kang, Ji Hei, Kim, Yong Hwan, Yang, Jeong-Mo, & Lee, Jongwook (2022). A study on improvements of research performance evaluation for enhancing the soundness of academic activities. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 33(4), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2022.33.4.093 
  14. Noh, Younghee, Yang, Jeong-Mo, Kang, Ji Hei, Lee, Jongwook, & Kim, Yong Hwan (2023). A study on measures to eradicate suspicious academic activities for improving soundness of academic activities. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 23(3), 59-75. http://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2023.23.03.059 
  15. Park, Heechang & Cho, Kwang-Hyun (2005). K-means clustering of social indicator survey data. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 7(2), 465-476 
  16. Park, Jinseo, Yun, Jinhyuk, & Lee, June Young (2019). Comparison of the Acceptance rate of Predatory Journals in country and field by Research data(KISTI DATA INSIGHT No. 8). Seoul: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information(KISTI).
  17. Aboyade, W., Ndubuisi-Okoh, E. O., Okoche, C., & Oladokun, B. D. (2024). Impact of predatory journal publishing on scholarly practices among academic librarians in Nigeria: A systematic review of literature. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3, 60. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202460 
  18. Beall, J. (2012). Predatory Publishers and Opportunities for Scholarly Societies. In American Educational Resarch Association meeting, 8-10. Available: http://eprints.rclis.org/18044/ 
  19. Brantley, S., Bruns, T. A., & Duffin, K. I. (2017). Librarians in transition: Scholarly communication support as a developing core competency. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 29(3), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2017.1340718 
  20. Brewerton, A. (2012). Re-skilling for research: Investigating the needs of researchers and how library staff can best support them. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18(1), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2012.665718
  21. Buitrago-Ciro, J. & Bowker, L. (2020). Investigating academic library responses to predatory publishing in the United States, Canada, and Spanish-speaking Latin America. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 625-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2020-0089 
  22. Buitrago-Ciro, J. (2022). How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54(3), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211016533 
  23. Cabells. (2019, March 13). Predatory Reports Criteria. Available: https://cabells.com/predatory-criteria-v1.1 
  24. Cohen, A. J., Patino, G., Kamal, P., Ndoye, M., Tresh, A., Mena, J., Butler, C., Washington S., & Breyer, B. N. (2019). Perspectives from authors and editors in the biomedical disciplines on predatory journals: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(8), e13769. https://www.jmir.org/2019/8/e13769 
  25. Crosetto, P. (2021, April 12). Is MDPI a Predatory Publisher?. Available: https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/. 
  26. Dony, C., Raskinet, M., Renaville, F., Simon, S., & Thirion, P. (2020). How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10339. 
  27. Ebadi, S. & Zamani, G. (2018). Predatory publishing as a case of symbolic violence: A critical English for academic purposes approach. Cogent Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1501889 
  28. Elmore, S. A. & Weston, E. H. (2020). Predatory journals: What they are and how to avoid them. Toxicol Pathol, 48(4), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623320920209. 
  29. Fonseca, J. R. S. (2012). Clustering in the field of social sciences: That is your choice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(5), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.716973 
  30. Inter Academy Partnership (2022, March). Combatting Predatory Academic Journals and Conferences. Available: https://www.interacademies.org/project/predatorypublishing 
  31. Klain-Gabbay, L. & Shoham, S. (2018). Scholarly communication and the academic library: Perceptions and recent developments. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82075 
  32. Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals?. Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150 
  33. Lipscomb, C. E., Martin, E. R., & Peay, W. J. (2009). Building the next generation of leaders: The NLM/AAHSL leadership fellows program. Journal of Library Administration, 49(8), 847-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820903396970 
  34. Lund, B. & Ma, J. (2021). A review of cluster analysis techniques and their uses in library and information science research: K-means and k-medoids clustering. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 22(3), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2021-0026 
  35. Mertkan, S., Aliusta, G. O., & Suphi, N. (2021). Profile of authors publishing in 'predatory' journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 30(4), 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab032 
  36. Moore, A. (2020). Predatory preprint servers join predatory journals in the paper mill industry.... BioEssays, 42. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202000259 
  37. Nicholas, D., Rodriguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Clark, Dj., Herman, E., Xu, J., Swigon, M., Serbina, G., Abrizah, A., Sims, D., Jamali, H. R., Tenopir, C., & Allard, S. (2023). Early career researchers and predatory journals during the Covid-19 pandemic. An international analysis. El Profesional de la Informacion, 32, 1699-2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.17 
  38. Oviedo-Garcia, M. A. (2021). Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Research Evaluation, 30(3), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab020 
  39. Plutchak, T. S. (2012). Breaking the barriers of time and space: The dawning of the great age of librarians. J Med Libr Assoc, 100(1), 10-9. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.004 
  40. Retraction Watch (2023). Nearly 20 Hindawi Journals Delisted from Leading Index amid Concerns of Papermill Activity. Available: https://retractionwatch.com/2023/03/21/nearly-20-hindawi-journals-delisted-from-leading-index-amid-concerns-of-papermill-activity/ 
  41. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. & Tsigaris, P. (2018). What value do journal whitelists and blacklists have in academia?. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(6), 781-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.017 
  42. Thomas, W. (2013). The structure of scholarly communications within academic libraries. Serials Review, 39, 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.07.003 
  43. Wallace, W. A. (2019). Publish and be damned: The damage being created by predatory publishing. Bone Joint, 101-B(5), 500-501. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1330.R1 
  44. Zhao, L. (2014). Riding the wave of open access: Providing library research support for scholarly-publishing literacy. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 45(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.882873