DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Competitiveness Improvement and Countermeasure of Export Promotion in Korean Industry

  • Jae-Sung LEE (Department of International Trade, Dong Eui University)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.19
  • 심사 : 2024.09.28
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30

초록

Purpose: The plant industry is a key order-taking industry that leads national industrial development through convergence and integration with various industries in all value chains from planning and marketing to financing, design and engineering, purchasing, construction, and operation and maintenance (O&M). Research design, data and methodology: The Korea government has been actively promoting overseas plant market development support projects to support large and public enterprises and medium and small enterprises. Results: The Korea government are working with the industry and the government so that the Korean plant industry can establish itself as a key driving force that provides the foundation for low-carbon and energy transition that our times demand and makes our world a better place to live. Conclusion: A high value-added industry that brings enormous profits and international fame to exporting countries. Korea is highly dependent on trade, should recognize the plant industry as a key national export sector.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by Dong-eui University Grant(No:202401140001).

참고문헌

  1. Anguelov, D. (2021). Banking 'development': the geopolitical-economy of infrastructure financing. Area Development and Policy, 6(3), 271-295.
  2. Chae, J. I. (2016) A study on the requirements and implications for "on board notation" on the bill of lading under letter of credit transaction, The International Commerce & Law Review, 71, 1-11.
  3. Dadabaev, T. (2018). Japanese and Chinese infrastructure development strategies in Central Asia. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 542-561.
  4. Endo, K. & Nikolay, M. (2023). Japan's infrastructure export and development cooperation: the role of ODA loan projects in the 2010s. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(2), 129-149.
  5. Ferreira, M. P. & Reis, N. R. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: a bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2550-2558.
  6. Grissler, J. & Lars, V. (2021). The BRI vs. FOIP: Japan's countering of China's global ambitions." ISDP Issue Brief, February 8. https://www.isdp.se/publication/the-bri-vs-foip-japans-countering-of-chinas-globalambitions/ (accessed 12 June 2024).
  7. Han, N. H. (2016). A study on the practical application of "on board notation" requiring to recived B/L under documentary L/C Transaction, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 17(4), 12-20.
  8. He, K.(2021). The balance of infrastructure in the indo-pacific: bri, institutional balancing, and quad's policy choices. Global Policy, 12(4), 545-552.
  9. Huh, J. C. (2010). A study on the DAP term under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(1), 103-121.
  10. Huh, J. C. (2010). A study on the seller's obligation to insure of CIF term in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 6(4), 191-202.
  11. ICC (2023) Set of guidance papers on recommended principles and usages around UCP 600 rules, ICC news and publications.
  12. ICC Homepages (2024). https://iccwbo.org/news-publications/policies-reports/set-of-guidance-papers-on-recommende d-principles-and-usages-around-ucp-600
  13. Japan Export Trade Organization. (2018). JETRO global trade and investment report. https://www.jetro.go.jp/ext_images/en/news/releases/2018/77fd93c565ffb27a/overvi ew.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
  14. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of allocation of costs in the incoterms 2010. International Commerce and Information Review, 14(3), 502-503.
  15. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of carriage contracts in incoterms 2010. Korea Trade Review, 37(2), 318-325.
  16. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of contract of insurance in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 8(1), 335-356.
  17. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of delivery and taking delivery in incoterms 2010. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 13(4), 232-235.
  18. Jeon, S. H. (2012). A study on the clauses of risk transfer in incoterms 2010. The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 13(2), 179.
  19. Jeon, S. H. (2014). A study on the clauses of notices in incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 10(3), .679-693.
  20. Jeon, S. H. (2015). An examination of the clauses of checking, packaging, marking and inspection of goods under incoterms 2010 rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 11(5), 101-115.
  21. Jeon, S. H. (2015). A study on the seller's obligation of delivery documents and the buyer's obligation of proof of delivery in incoterms□ 2010 rules. Korea Trade Review, 40(5), 318-351.
  22. Jeon, S. H. (2016). An examination of container cargo rules under the new incoterms 2010: Based on FCA, CIP and CIP rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 12(3), 539-559.
  23. Keola, S. (2023). Japan builds on ASEAN's infrastructure ambitions. East Asia Forum, September 21. https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/09/21/japan-builds-onaseans-infrastructure-ambitio ns/ (accessed 12 June 2024).
  24. Kim, D. Y. (2019) Review on the updated international standard banking practice(ISBP745), International Commerce and Information Review, 15(3), 12-20.
  25. Kim, D. C. (2019). A study on the delivered at terminal (DAT) term under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(1), 473-490.
  26. Kim, I. H. (2013). Various types of bill of lading and its substitutes engaged in the shipping practice. Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 22(1), 272-275.
  27. Kong, J. H. (2014). Case study on examination requirements for air transport document under documentary credits, Journal of International Trade and Insurance, 15(4), 20-29.
  28. Lee, S. K. (2018). A comparison of the transfer of risk between cisg and incoterms□ 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(4), 239-257.
  29. Lee, H. M. (2010). Several private international law issues associated with the governing law clause in bills of lading. Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 19(1), 173-187.
  30. Lee, J. S. (2015). A study on the surrender b/l and the subrogation claim of marine cargo insurance under international trade transaction. The International Commerce & Law Review, 65(1), 72-73.
  31. Lee, J. S. (2019). Issues in trade documents resulting from the misuse of trade terms in incoterms: A literature review. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(6), 633-652.
  32. Lee, J. S. & Huh, E. S. (2017). A study on standard types of free carrier (fca) on incoterms for seaborne container goods transportation: Korean trade companies' perspective. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(5), 51-66.
  33. Liao, J. C. & Saori, N. K. (2022). Institutions, ideation, and diffusion of japan's and china's overseas infrastructure promotion policies. New Political Economy, 27(6): 944-957.
  34. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2014). white paper on land, infrastructure, transport and tourism in Japan.
  35. Park, S. J. & Shin, G. H. (2022). A study on the problems and practical implications of the application of incoterms 2020: focusing on general, transportation, and insurance related issues, The International Commerce & Law Review, 96, 31-40.
  36. Park, S. J. (2020). A study on the problems related to international multimodal transport in international trade rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 16(1), 401-410.
  37. Park, S. W. (2017). A review of the transportation rules of fob and cfr under incoterms 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(1), 411-427.
  38. Park, S. W. (2018). A review of the transportation rules of dat and dap under incoterms® 2010. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(1), 419-434.
  39. Park, S. W. (2013). A study on the revision of transport documents under ISBP 745, International Commerce and Information Review, 15(2), 19-28.
  40. Park, S. W. & Han, K. M. (2012). Review on the new revised ISBP, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 13(4), 23-33.
  41. Pascha, W. (2020). The quest for infrastructure development from a "market creation. perspective: China's belt and road, Japan's quality infrastructure and the EU's connecting Europe and Asia, International Economics and Economic Policy, 17, 687-704.
  42. Phene, A. S. & Almeida. P. (2012). When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), 753-783.
  43. Rajah, R. (2020). Mobilizing the indo-pacific infrastructure response to China's blet and road initiative in southeast asia. Brookings Foreign Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FP_20200429_mobilize_compete_rajah.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
  44. Schindler, S., Ilias, A., Jessica, D., Nicholas, J., Steve . R., Mustafa, K., Louis C., Meredith ., Alireza, F., Farahani, T., Liu, Hannah M., Julie T., Philip, N., Gilead T., Maximiliano F., Kevin W., Tim, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2024). The second cold war: us-china competition for centrality in infrastructure, digital, production, and finance networks. Geopolitics, 29(4), 1083-1120.
  45. Shin, H. S. & Kim, D. Y. (2019). An examination of the revised contents of incoterms□ 2020 rules. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 15(5), 537-552.
  46. Sin, J. S.(2012). Comparative on the documentary conditions of international trade transaction, The International Commerce & Law Review, 54, 10-19.
  47. Song, G. E. (2013). An analysis on the usage status and promotion of multimodal transport logistics terms in incoterms 2010. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 29(1), 126-139.
  48. Woo, K. M. (2013). Interpretation problem with application of incoterms in arbitral awards of the international chamber of commerce. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 9(7), 42-52.
  49. Woo, K. M. (2015). Traditional trade terms of incoterms® 2010 and the main standard contract form. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 11(4), 161-179.
  50. Woo, K. M. (2017). An analysis of the usage and problems of incoterms rules interpretation in small and medium trading companies. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(2), 235-253.
  51. World Bank. 2023. Quality infrastructure investment partnership - 2023 qii annual report.
  52. Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2017. Japan's export of infrastructure systems: pursuing twin goals through developmental means. The Pacific Review, 30(4), 494-512.
  53. Zhang, J. & He, X. (2014). Economic nationalism and foreign acquisition completion: The case of China. International Business Review, 23(1), 212-227