Advanced Industrial SCIence (산업과 과학)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Supply Chain Digital Transformation on Corporate Performance

공급망 디지털 전환이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향

  • Kyung-Ihl Kim (Division of Convergence Management, National Korea University of Transportation) ;
  • Seong-Hyo Lee (Division of General Education, Myong Ji University)
  • 김경일 (국립한국교통대학교 융합경영학과) ;
  • 이성효 (명지대학교 자연교양학부)
  • Received : 2024.06.07
  • Accepted : 2024.09.20
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how supply chain digital transformation affects corporate performance by building supply chain agility and innovation capabilities based on the resource-based view (RBV) theory. The model was verified using structural equation modeling based on a data set of 271 domestic companies, and mediation and moderation analyzes were performed to test the research hypotheses. The study found a positive correlation between supply chain digital transformation and corporate performance that is fully mediated by both supply chain agility and innovation capability, with the potential for the interaction between supply chain agility and innovation capability to have adverse consequences for corporate performance. This study is expected to advance our understanding on the antecedents of corporate performance by integrating supply chain digital transformation and the mediating mechanisms of supply chain agility and innovation capabilities that serve as a conduit between supply chain digital transformation and RBV-based corporate performance.

본 연구는 자원기반관점(RBV) 이론을 기반으로 공급망 디지털 전환이 공급망 민첩성과 혁신 역량을 구축함으로써 기업의 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 조사하고자 함에 목적이 있다. 국내 271개 기업의 데이터 세트를 바탕으로 구조 방정식 모델링을 사용하여 모델을 검증했고 연구 가설을 테스트하기 위해 조정 및 조정 분석이 수행되었다. 연구 결과는 공급망 민첩성과 혁신 역량 모두에 의해 완전히 조정되는 공급망 디지털 전환과 기업 성과 사이에 긍정적인 상관관계가 있음을 발견하였으며 공급망 민첩성과 혁신 역량 간의 상호 작용은 기업 성과에 불리한 결과를 초래할 가능성이 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 공급망 디지털 전환를 통합하고 공급망 민첩성과 공급망 디지털 전환과 RBV기반 기업성과 사이의 통로 역할을 하는 혁신 역량의 중재 메커니즘을 통합함으로써 기업 성과의 선행 요인에 대한 이해를 증진시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Seyedghorban, Z., Tahernejad, H., Meriton, R., & Graham, G. (2020). Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future. Production Planning & Control, 31(2-3), 96-114. DOI : 10.1080/09537287.2019.1631461. 
  2. Li, N., Liu, D., & Boadu, F. (2023). The impact of digital supply chain capabilities on enterprise sustainable competitive performance: an ambidextrous view. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(6), 1670-1689. DOI : 10.1108/imds-11-2022-0699. 
  3. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 169-196. DOI : 10.2307/3250983. 
  4. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250050207. 
  5. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), 13-35. DOI : 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13. 
  6. Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T., & Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107501. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.022. 
  7. Hartley, J. L., & Sawaya, W. J. (2019). Tortoise, not the hare: Digital transformation of supply chain business processes. Business Horizons, 62(6), 707-715. DOI : 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.006. 
  8. Srai, J., & Settanni, E. (2019). Supply chain digital twins: opportunities and challenges beyond the hype. 23rd Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. 
  9. Kittipanya-Ngam, P., & Tan, K. H. (2020). A framework for food supply chain digitalization: lessons from Thailand. Production Planning & Control, 31(2-3), 158-172. DOI : 10.1080/09537287.2019.1631462. 
  10. Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Holcomb, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2019). Distinguishing between the concepts of supply chain agility and resilience: A multidisciplinary literature review. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 467-487. DOI : 10.1108/ijlm-10-2017-0259. 
  11. Daneshvar Kakhki, M., Rea, A., & Deiranlou, M. (2023). Data analytics dynamic capabilities for Triple-A supply chains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(2), 534-555. DOI : 10.1108/imds-03-2022-0167. 
  12. Girod, S. J., Birkinshaw, J., & Prange, C. (2023). Business agility: key themes and future directions. California Management Review, 65(4), 5-21. DOI : 10.1177/00081256231186641. 
  13. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2020). Agile supply chain management: where did it come from and where will it go in the era of digital transformation?. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 324-345. DOI : 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.011. 
  14. Wang, M. (2020). Assessing logistics capability for the Australian courier firms. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 37(4), 576-589. DOI : 10.1504/ijlsm.2020.111827. 
  15. Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International journal of innovation management, 5(03), 377-400. DOI : 10.1142/s1363919601000427. 
  16. Lu, Q., Liu, B., & Song, H. (2020). How can SMEs acquire supply chain financing: the capabilities and information perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(4), 784-809. DOI : 10.1108/imds-02-2019-0072.