DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association Between Sickness Presenteeism and Depressive Symptoms by Occupation and Employment Type During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Minkoo Kang (Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Won-Tae Lee (Division of Infectious Disease Control, Jeollanam-do Provincial Government) ;
  • Byungyoon Yun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jin-Ha Yoon (Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.11.05
  • Accepted : 2024.06.03
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

Background: Sickness presenteeism (SP) has gained attention in occupational health. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between SP and depressive symptoms by occupation and employment type during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. Methods: Community Health Survey data (August 16 to October 31, 2020-2021) were used to assess depressive symptoms and SP among workers (n = 221,241; mean age 46.0; 53.5% male). Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and SP was defined by the ability to rest at home when exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of depressive symptoms were estimated using multiple logistic regression analyses for each sex and year stratum. The interaction between SP and occupation on depressive symptoms was assessed using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Results: The prevalence of depressive symptoms was higher in individuals with SP than in those without SP (4.22% [n = 696] vs. 1.89% [n = 3861], respectively). After adjusting for demographic and occupational variables, the association between SP and depressive symptoms was significant in both sexes in 2020 and 2021 (OR [95% CI]: 2.18 [1.82-2.62], 2.41 [1.97-2.93], 2.05 [1.77-2.38], 2.47 [2.11-2.88] for male-2020, male-2021, female-2020, and female-2021, respectively). A marginally significant interaction between service workers and SP on depressive symptoms was observed among male workers in 2021 (RERI = 2.37, 95% CI = [-0.04-4.78]) but not in other strata. Conclusion: SP is significantly associated with depressive symptoms in Korean workers across employment and occupational types, with a prominent association in service workers.

Keywords

References

  1. Masuda M, Ishimaru T, Hino A, Ando H, Tateishi S, Nagata T, Tsuji M, Matsuda S, Fujino Y. A cross-sectional study of psychosocial factors and sickness presenteeism in Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Environ Med 2022;64:e1-7. 
  2. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K, Dallner M. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. J Epidemol Community Health 2000;54:502-9. 
  3. Brouwer W, Verbooy K, Hoefman R, van Exel J. Production losses due to absenteeism and presenteeism: the influence of compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects. Pharmacoeconomics 2023;41:1103-15. 
  4. Ferreira AI, Mach M, Martinez LF, Miraglia M. Sickness presenteeism in the aftermath of COVID-19: is presenteeism remote-work behavior the new (Ab) normal? Front Psychol 2022;12. 
  5. Skagen K, Collins AM. The consequences of sickness presenteeism on health and wellbeing over time: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2016;161:169-77. 
  6. Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie JE, Hemingway H, Shipley MJ, Vahtera J, Marmot MG. Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: the whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 2005;95:98-102. 
  7. Gustafsson K, Marklund S. Consequences of sickness presence and sickness absence on health and work ability: a Swedish prospective cohort study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2011;24:153-65. 
  8. Ambresin G, Chondros P, Dowrick C, Herrman H, Gunn JM. Self-rated health and long-term prognosis of depression. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:57-65. 
  9. Kim M-S, Park JB, Min K-B, Lee K-J, Kwon K. Presenteeism among self-employed workers: Korean working conditions survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2014;26:32. 
  10. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 2007;370:851-8. 
  11. Lee K-S. Association between sickness presenteeism and depressive symptoms in Korean workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. J Affective Disord 2022;319:344-51. 
  12. Hwang IC, Choi S. Health-related habits and health promotion behaviors in people with alcohol flushing. Asia Pac J Public Health 2023;35:284-7. 
  13. Jo S, Han S-Y, Howe N. Factors associated with handwashing behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the community health survey in Korea. SAGE Open Nurs 2023;9:23779608231172364. 
  14. Han C, Jo SA, Kwak J-H, Pae C-U, Steffens D, Jo I, Park MH. Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 Korean version in the elderly population: the ansan geriatric study. Compr Psychiatry 2008;49:218-23. 
  15. Sidebottom AC, Harrison PA, Godecker A, Kim H. Validation of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9 for prenatal depression screening. Arch Womens Ment Health 2012;15:367-74. 
  16. Cha W-T, Joo H-J, Park Y-S, Park E-C, Kim S-Y. Depression before and during-COVID-19 by gender in the Korean population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:3477. 
  17. Kwak GH, Baek SH, Kwak EJ. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on senior dental students in Korea: Examining stress, burnout, and depression. J Dent Sci 2024 Apr;19(2):909-18. 
  18. Lee M-S, Lee H. The risk of obstructive sleep apnea is highly correlated with depressive symptoms among the Korean adults population: results from the 2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. BMC Psychiatry 2023;23:467. 
  19. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13. 
  20. Yoon J-H, Jung SJ, Choi J, Kang M-Y. Suicide trends over time by occupation in Korea and their relationship to economic downturns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:2007. 
  21. Chen JJ. Communicating complex information: the interpretation of statistical interaction in multiple logistic regression analysis. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1376-7 author reply 7. 
  22. Knol MJ, VanderWeele TJ. Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:514-20. 
  23. Lin YH, Chen CY, Lu SY. Physical discomfort and psychosocial job stress among male and female operators at telecommunication call centers in Taiwan. Appl Ergon 2009;40:561-8. 
  24. Szymczak JE, Smathers S, Hoegg C, Klieger S, Coffin SE, Sammons JS. Reasons why physicians and advanced practice clinicians work while sick: a mixed-methods analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:815-21. 
  25. Gustafsson Senden M, Lovseth LT, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Fridner A. What makes physicians go to work while sick: a comparative study of sickness presenteeism in four European countries (HOUPE). Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13840. 
  26. Kinman G. Sickness presenteeism at work: prevalence, costs and management. Br Med Bull 2019;129:69-78. 
  27. Chun H-r, Cho I, Choi Y, Cho S-i. Effects of emotional labor factors and working environment on the risk of depression in pink-collar workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:5208. 
  28. Tafet GE, Nemeroff CB. The links between stress and depression: psychoneuroendocrinological, genetic, and environmental interactions. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016;28:77-88. 
  29. Abramson LY, Alloy LB, Hogan ME, Whitehouse WG, Donovan P, Rose DT, Panzarella C, Raniere D. Cognitive vulnerability to depression: theory and evidence. J Cogn Psychother 1999;13:5-20. 
  30. Haeffel GJ, Hershenberg R, Goodson JT, Hein S, Square A, Grigorenko EL, Chapman J. The hopelessness theory of depression: clinical utility and generalizability. Cogn Ther Res 2017;41:543-55. 
  31. Liu RT, Kleiman EM, Nestor BA, Cheek SM. The hopelessness theory of depression: a quarter century in review. Clin Psychol (New York) 2015;22: 345e65. 
  32. Marciniak-Nuqui Z, Cabling ML, Romanelli RJ. Culture of presenteeism: emergent perspectives from an NHS-workforce convenience sample. Occup Med (Lond) 2024 Apr 3;74(2):167-71. 
  33. Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R, Kira B, Petherick A, Phillips T, Webster S, Cameron-Blake E, Hallas L, Majumdar S, Tatlow H. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nat Hum Behav 2021;5:529-38. 
  34. Ma Y, Mishra SR, Han X-K, Zhu D-S. The relationship between time to a high COVID-19 response level and timing of peak daily incidence: an analysis of governments' Stringency Index from 148 countries. Infect Dis Poverty 2021;10:96. 
  35. Jung SW, Lee J-H, Lee K-J. Assessing the association between emotional labor and presenteeism among nurses in Korea: cross-sectional study using the 4th Korean working conditions survey. Saf Health Work 2020;11:103-8. 
  36. Lim S-S, Lee W, Hong K, Jeung D, Chang S-J, Yoon J-H. Facing complaining customer and suppressed emotion at worksite related to sleep disturbance in Korea. jkms 2016;31:1696-702. 
  37. Kucharczyk ER, Morgan K, Hall AP. The occupational impact of sleep quality and insomnia symptoms. Sleep Med Rev 2012;16:547-59. 
  38. Hur W-M. Daily relationships between job insecurity and emotional labor amid COVID-19: mediation of ego depletion and moderation of off-job control and work-related smartphone use. J Occup Health Psychol 2023;28:82-102. 
  39. Shin Y, Hur W-M. When do job-insecure employees keep performing well? The buffering roles of help and prosocial motivation in the relationship between job insecurity, work engagement, and job performance. J Bus Psychol 2021;36:659-78. 
  40. Gilbreath B, Karimi L. Supervisor behavior and employee presenteeism. Int J Leadership Stud 2012;7:114-31. 
  41. Ferreira AI, da Costa Ferreira P, Cooper CL, Oliveira D. How daily negative affect and emotional exhaustion correlates with work engagement and presenteeism-constrained productivity. Int J Stress Manag 2019;26:261. 
  42. Price L, Spence SH. Burnout symptoms amongst drug and alcohol service employees: gender differences in the interaction between work and home stressors. Anxiety Stress Copin 1994;7:67-84. 
  43. Zhang J, Wang S, Wang W, Shan G, Guo S, Li Y. Nurses' job insecurity and emotional exhaustion: the mediating effect of presenteeism and the moderating effect of supervisor support. Front Psychol 2020;11. 
  44. Jeon SH, Leem JH, Park SG, Heo YS, Lee BJ, Moon SH, Jung DY, Kim HC. Association among working hours, occupational stress, and presenteeism among wage workers: results from the second Korean working conditions survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2014;26:6. 
  45. Sverke M, Hellgren J, Naswall K. No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. J Occup Health Psychol 2002;7:242-64. 
  46. Han K-M, Shin C, Yoon H-K, Ko Y-H, Kim Y-K, Han C. Emotional labor and depressive mood in service and sales workers: interactions with gender and job autonomy. Psychiatry Res 2018;267:490-8. 
  47. Hausser JA, Mojzisch A, Niesel M, Schulz-Hardt S. Ten years on: a review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work Stress 2010;24:1-35. 
  48. Lee SH, Sung JH, Kim DH, Sim CS. The association between direct supervisor's behavior and employee presenteeism in Korean wage workers: findings from the fifth Korean Working Condition Survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2021;33:e30.