DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Impacts of Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality -Focus on Apples and Grapes-

과수 고품질 시설현대화 사업 효과분석 -사과와 포도를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2024.05.14
  • Accepted : 2024.08.21
  • Published : 2024.08.31

Abstract

The Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality was implemented to improve the competitiveness of the domestic fruit tree sector, and as a result of analyzing samples of participating and non-participating farmers, it is judged to have contributed to the improvement of high-quality fruit production. As a result of analysis using the propensity score matching method, it was found that the Facility Modernization Policy for apple farms contributed to the improvement of fruit quality such as sweetness and high-quality product ratio. In addition, the fruit tree high-quality facility modernization project was found to reduce working hours by about 30 hours per 10a. In the case of grapes, it contributed to quality improvement, including increased sugar content, and reduced working hours by about 15.5 hours per 10a. This study has a limitation in that the number of samples subject to the survey is not large enough, and because of this, it appears that no statistically significant differences in performance variables such as production per unit area and management costs per unit area were found between participating and non-participating farms.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung, H. J., Y. J. Choi, W. H. Jung, 2021. "Analysis of Facility Modernization Policy Effect for Improvement of Fruit Quality", 「Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy」 48(1): 83-105. https://doi.org/10.30805/KJAMP.2021.48.1.83
  2. Kim, D, H., J. G. Yoon, 2023. "Perception Disparities in Agriculture and Rural Areas: Insights from Rural Residency Experience", 「Journal of Rural Development」 46(2): 21-44. https://doi.org/10.36464/JRD.2023.46.2.002
  3. Khandker, S., Koolwal, G, and Samad, H. 2010. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington: The World Bank.
  4. MAFRA, 2023. "2023 Performance Management Implementation Plan".
  5. Min, I. S., and P. S. Choi, 2021. STATA Advanced statistical analysis. 2nd. Jipil Media.
  6. Moon, H. P., M. K. Jung, K. S. Nam, H. Y. Jung, 2014. "Achievements and improvement directions of FTA domestic complementary measures", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 「Agricultural policy focus」 91: 1-27.
  7. Park, M.S., and B.S. Kim. 2017. "A Measurement on the Economic Effects of Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality", 「Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society」 18(5): 581-586.
  8. Park, M.S., and B.I. Ahn. 2016. "Analysis of the impact of meal regularity on adult obesity", 「Journal of Rural Development」 39(3): 79-122.
  9. Pa rk, J.K., S. H. Ha n, K. S. Na m, H. U. Jung, 2015. "Evaluation of 2014 FTA domestic supplementary measures and future tasks", Korea Rural Economic Institure, 「Agricultural policy focus」 112: 1-24.
  10. Rosenbaum, P. R. and D. B. Rubin, "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika, 70(1): 41-55, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  11. Rubin, D(1974), "Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies," Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350