대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

부인암 환자의 온코퍼틸리티 영향요인: 혼합연구방법의 적용

Factors Influencing Oncofertility in Gynecological Cancer Patients: Application of Mixed Methods Study

  • Kim, Minji (College of Nursing, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ha, Juyoung (College of Nursing, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.22
  • 심사 : 2024.05.31
  • 발행 : 2024.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to identify factors influencing oncofertility and to explore the oncofertility experiences of patients with gynecological cancer using quantitative and qualitative methods, respectively. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted. The quantitative study involved 222 patients with gynecological cancer recruited from online cafes and hospitals. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 28. For qualitative research, eight patients with gynecological cancer were interviewed. Data were analyzed using theme analysis method. Results: Oncofertility performance was quantitatively assessed in 40 patients (18.0%). Factors that significantly affected oncofertility were fertility preservation awareness (odds ratio [OR] = 14.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.22~53.08), number of children planned before cancer diagnosis (OR = 6.08, 95% CI: 1.89~19.62; OR = 5.04, 95% CI: 1.56~16.29), monthly income (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.23~8.86), social support (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01~1.17), and anxiety (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66~0.95). Qualitative results showed three theme clusters and eight themes: (1) themes for determinant factors affecting oncofertility selection: 'desire to have children' and 'special meaning of the uterus and ovaries;' (2) themes for obstructive factors affecting oncofertility selection: 'fertility preservation fall behind priorities,' 'confusion caused by inaccurate information,' and 'my choice was not supported;' (3) themes for support factors affecting oncofertility selection: 'provide accurate and reasonable information about oncofertility,' 'addressing the healthcare gap,' and 'need financial support for oncofertility.' Conclusion: Financial support, sufficient information, social support, and anxiety-relief interventions are required for oncofertility in patients with gynecological cancer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Cancer registration statistics [Internet]. KOSIS; 1998 [cited 2024 Mar 2]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?parentId=F.1&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&menuId=M_01_01&outLink=Y&entrType=.
  2. National Cancer Information Center. Cancer as seen in statistics [Internet]. National Cancer Information Center; 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.cancer.go.kr.
  3. Huang J, Chan WC, Ngai CH, Lok V, Zhang L, Lucero-Prisno DE 3rd, et al. Worldwide burden, risk factors, and temporal trends of ovarian cancer: A global study. Cancers. 2022;14(9):2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092230
  4. Kim SJ, Shin H. The experience of gynecologic cancer in young women: A qualitative study. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2023;53(1):115-128.  https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.22119
  5. Triarico S, Capozza MA, Mastrangelo S, Attina G, Maurizi P, Ruggiero A. Gynecological cancer among adolescents and young adults (AYA). Annals of Translational Medicine. 2020;8(6):397. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.41
  6. Pizzoferrato AC, Klein M, Fauvet R, Durand C, Foucher F, Sardain H, et al. Pelvic floor disorders and sexuality in women with ovarian cancer: A systematic review. Gynecologic Oncology. 2021;161(1):264-274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.026
  7. La Rosa VL, Shah M, Kahramanoglu I, Cerentini TM, Ciebiera M, Lin LT, et al. Quality of life and fertility preservation counseling for women with gynecological cancer: An integrated psychological and clinical perspective. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;41(2):86-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2019.1648424
  8. Korean Society for Fertility Preservation. Information for fertility preservation [Internet]. Korean Society for Fertility Preservation; 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 5]. Available from: http://www.ksfp2013.org/intro/main.
  9. La Rosa VL, Garzon S, Gullo G, Fichera M, Sisti G, Gallo P, et al. Fertility preservation in women affected by gynaecological cancer: The importance of an integrated gynaecological and psychological approach. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14:1035. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1035
  10. Woodruff TK. The Oncofertility Consortium--addressing fertility in young people with cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2010;7(8):466-475.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.81
  11. Logan S, Anazodo A. The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019;98(5):583-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13562
  12. Villarreal-Garza C, Mesa-Chavez F, Plata de la Mora A, Miaja-Avila M, Garcia-Garcia M, Fonseca A, et al. Prospective study of fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer in Mexico. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2021;19(13):37-44.  https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.7692
  13. Dorfman CS, Stalls JM, Mills C, Voelkel S, Thompson M, Acharya KS, et al. Addressing barriers to fertility preservation for cancer patients: The role of oncofertility patient navigation. Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship. 2021;12(10):332-348.
  14. Zaami S, Melcarne R, Patrone R, Gullo G, Negro F, Napoletano G, et al. Oncofertility and reproductive counseling in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(5):1311.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051311
  15. Chen M, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Jiang F, Wang X. Psychological state and decision perceptions of male and female cancer patients on fertility preservation. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022;30(7):5723-5728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06973-z
  16. Huang SM, Tseng LM, Lai JC, Tsai YF, Lien PJ, Chen PH. Impact of symptom and social support on fertility intention in reproductive-age women with breast cancer. Clinical Nursing Research. 2020;29(6):411-418.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818770814
  17. Bentsen L, Pappot H, Hjerming M, Colmorn LB, Macklon KT, Hanghoj S. How do young women with cancer experience oncofertility counselling during cancer treatment? A qualitative, single centre study at a Danish tertiary hospital. Cancers. 2021;13(6):1355.  https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061355
  18. Kim YY. Fertility preservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer [master's thesis]. Ulsan: University of Ulsan; 2022. p. 1-65.
  19. Park SR, Kang HS. Perceptions towards fertility preservation among female cancer patients. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2022;23(2):477-486. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.2.477
  20. Kim YJ. Oncofertility related experiences among breast cancer survivors [dissertation]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2021. p. 1-135.
  21. Ladores S, Campbell CM, Bray LA, Li P, Brown J, Woods B, et al. Fertility preservation in women with cystic fibrosis pre-lung transplantation: A mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2022;78(2):532-540.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15099
  22. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67(6):361-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
  23. Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. The hospital anxiey and depression scale with the irritability-depression-anxiety scale and the Leeds situational anxiety scale: Manual. NFER-Nelson; 1994. p. 1-13. 
  24. Oh SM, Min KJ, Park DB. A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depressed scale for Koreans-a comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1999;38(2):289-296.
  25. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1988;52(1):30-41.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
  26. Shin JS, Lee YB. The effects of social supports on psychosocial well-being of the unemployed. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 1999;37:241-269.
  27. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62(1):107-115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x 
  28. Lincoln YS, Guba GE. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications; 1985. p. 301-331.
  29. Martinet-Kosinski F, Lamy S, Bauvin E, Dalenc F, Vaysse C, Grosclaude P. Access to information and oncofertility consultation for young women with breast cancer: A population-based study. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):3313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30423-3
  30. Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, Amant F, Wyns C, Stukenborg JB, et al. Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology. 2020; 31(12):1664-1678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006
  31. Lee JR, Oh PJ. A structural model for chemotherapy related cognitive impairment and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2019;49(4): 375-385. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.375
  32. Kim SA, Han SH. Impacts of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and cognitive function on the quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of EastWest Nursing Research. 2021;27(2):185-194.  https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2021.27.2.185
  33. Kim GE, Song JE, You MA, Park JH. Symptom experience, social support, and quality of life in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2022;22(1):29-36.  https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2022.22.1.29
  34. Jeong J, Kim HK. Effects of symptom clusters, uncertainty and social support on health-related quality of life in patient with lung cancer. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2023;23(3):126-135. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2023.23.3.126
  35. Heritage SR, Feast A, Mourad M, Smith L, Hatcher H, Critoph DJ. Documentation of oncofertility communication in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 2022;11(3):275-283.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2021.0087
  36. Stiner RK, Clarke JL, Sinha N, Chan J, Letourneau JM, Niemasik EE, et al. Attitudes toward fertility and fertility preservation in women with glioma. Neuro-Oncology Practice. 2019;6(3):218-225.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npy036
  37. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Annual Report on live births and death statistics [Internet]. KOSIS; 1998 [cited 2024 Mar 2]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/ statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01&statId=1962004 #A_3.2.
  38. Woodruff TK, Ataman-Millhouse L, Acharya KS, Almeida-Santos T, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, et al. A view from the past into our collective future: The oncofertility consortium vision statement. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021;38(1):3-15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01983-4
  39. Meernik C, Mersereau JE, Baggett CD, Engel SM, Moy LM, Cannizzaro NT, et al. Fertility preservation and financial hardship among adolescent and young adult women with cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2022;31(5):1043-1051.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1305