Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical outcomes of open Latarjet-Patte procedures performed for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with primary bone loss versus failed arthroscopic Bankart repair

  • Neil Gambhir (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Aidan G. Papalia (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Matthew G. Alben (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Paul Romeo (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Gabriel Larose (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Soterios Gyftopoulos (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Andrew S. Rokito (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health) ;
  • Mandeep S. Virk (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital-NYU Langone Health)
  • Received : 2023.07.10
  • Accepted : 2023.09.25
  • Published : 2024.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: This study compares the outcomes of Latarjet-Patte procedures (LPs) performed for primary glenohumeral instability in the setting of critical bone loss (LP-BL) versus salvage surgery performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair (LP-FB). Methods: LP's performed by senior author from 2017 to 2021 were separated into cohorts by LP indication. Data abstracted from electronic medical records included demographic information, preoperative clinical scores, radiological imaging, and complications. Postoperative clinical outcome scores collected after a 2-year minimum follow-up included: patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE), PROMIS pain interference, PROMIS pain intensity, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale pain scores. Results: A total of 47 patients (LP-BL: n=29, LP-FB: n=18) with a mean age of 29 years (range, 15-58 years) were included in this study. Both cohorts achieved good upper extremity functionality without significant differences as indicated by mean PROMIS UE (LP-BL: 52.6±10.0 vs. LP-FB: 54.6±7.6, P=0.442) and ASES score (LP-BL: 89.9±15.7 vs. LP-FB: 91.5±14.4, P=0.712). However, the LP-FB cohort reported lower levels of pain (LP-FB: 0.5±1.1 vs. LP-BL: 1.9±2.7, P=0.020) at their latest follow-up. There were no significant differences in complication rates including re-dislocation between cohorts (LP-BL: 2/29 [6.9%] vs. LP-FB: 2/18 [11.1%], P=0.629). Conclusions: When performed after failed Bankart repair, the LP results in similar postoperative functional outcomes and similar rates of complications and re-dislocations when compared to the primary indication of recurrent glenohumeral instability in the setting of critical bone loss.

Keywords

References

  1. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2000;16:677-94. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2000.17715
  2. Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Melis B, Walch G. Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1691-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.015
  3. Riff AJ, Frank RM, Sumner S, et al. Trends in shoulder stabilization techniques used in the United States based on a large private-payer database. Orthop J Sports Med 2017;5:2325967117745511.
  4. Young AA, Maia R, Berhouet J, Walch G. Open Latarjet procedure for management of bone loss in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20(2 Suppl):S61-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.022
  5. Hurley ET, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, Montgomery C, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:e33-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.028
  6. An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:853-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001
  7. Yamamoto N, Muraki T, An KN, et al. The stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1390-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00777
  8. Yapp LZ, Nicholson JA, McCallum C, Macdonald DJ, Robinson CM. Latarjet as a primary and revision procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a comparative study of survivorship, complications and functional outcomes in the medium to long-term. Shoulder Elbow 2020;12:338-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573219864926
  9. Flinkkila T, Sirnio K. Open Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101:35-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.005
  10. Flinkkila T, Knape R, Nevalainen M, Sirnio K, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Previous arthroscopic Bankart repair is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome after Latarjet procedure. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:1481-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.06.020
  11. Werthel JD, Sabatier V, Schoch B, et al. Outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of chronic anterior shoulder instability: patients with prior arthroscopic Bankart repair versus primary cases. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:27-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519888909
  12. Rodkey DL, Colantonio DF, LeClere LE, Kilcoyne KG, Dickens JF. Latarjet after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair results in twice the rate of recurrent instability compared with primary Latarjet. Arthroscopy 2021;37:3248-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.059
  13. Gyftopoulos S, Beltran LS, Yemin A, et al. Use of 3D MR reconstructions in the evaluation of glenoid bone loss: a clinical study. Skeletal Radiol 2014;43:213-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1774-5
  14. Virk M, Yip M, Liuzza L, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes with a posteriorly augmented glenoid for Walch B2, B3, and C glenoids in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:e196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.031
  15. Rothrock NE, Amtmann D, Cook KF. Development and validation of an interpretive guide for PROMIS scores. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020;4:16.
  16. Menendez ME, Sudah SY, Cohn MR, et al. Defining minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state after the Latarjet procedure. Am J Sports Med 2022;50:2761-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221107939
  17. Gupta A, Delaney R, Petkin K, Lafosse L. Complications of the Latarjet procedure. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015;8:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9258-y
  18. Domos P, Lunini E, Walch G. Contraindications and complications of the Latarjet procedure. Shoulder Elbow 2018;10:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217728716
  19. Gambhir N, Alben MG, Kim MT, Gyftopoulos S, Rokito AS, Virk MS. No differences in 90-day complications and admissions after Latarjet procedure for primary bone loss versus Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic instability repair. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022;4:e1647-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.06.010