DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rate of incidental findings on routine preoperative computed tomography for shoulder arthroplasty

  • Daniel G. Meeker (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa) ;
  • Maria F. Bozoghlian (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa) ;
  • Taylor Den Hartog (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa) ;
  • Jill Corlette (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa) ;
  • James V. Nepola (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa) ;
  • Brendan M. Patterson (Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa)
  • Received : 2023.09.23
  • Accepted : 2023.12.17
  • Published : 2024.06.01

Abstract

Background: Incidental findings are commonly noted in advanced imaging studies. Few data exist regarding the rate of incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning. This study aims to identify the incidence of these findings and the rate at which they warrant further work-up to help guide orthopedic surgeons in counseling patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with available preoperative shoulder CT who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroplasty procedures at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. Data including age, sex, and smoking status were obtained. Radiology reports for CTs were reviewed for incidental findings and categorized based on location, tissue type, and/or body system. The rate of incidental findings and the rate at which further follow-up was recommended by the radiologist were determined. Results: A total of 617 patients was identified. There were 173 incidental findings noted in 146 of these patients (23.7%). Findings ranged from pulmonary (59%), skin/soft tissue (16%), thyroid (13%), vascular (9%), spinal (2%), and abdominal (1%) areas. Of the pulmonary findings, 50% were pulmonary nodules and 47% were granulomatous disease. Overall, the final radiology report recommended further follow-up for 50% of the patients with incidental findings. Conclusions: Incidental findings are relatively common in preoperative CTs obtained for shoulder arthroplasty, occurring in nearly one-quarter of patients. Most of these findings are pulmonary in nature. Overall, half of the patients with incidental findings were recommended for further follow-up. These results establish population data to guide orthopedic surgeons in patient counseling. Level of evidence: III.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

BMP received research funding from Stryker Orthopedics and is a paid consultant for Stryker Orthopedics.

References

  1. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB. Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1491-502.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1491
  2. Iannotti JP, Walker K, Rodriguez E, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET. Accuracy of 3-dimensional planning, implant templating, and patient-specific instrumentation in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:446-57.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01614
  3. Werner BS, Hudek R, Burkhart KJ, Gohlke F. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:1477-83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.006
  4. Gates S, Sager B, Khazzam M. Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review. EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:126-37.  https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011
  5. Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:2249-54.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01994
  6. Jain NB, Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1905-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.055
  7. Christensen GV, O'Reilly OC, Bozoghlian MF, An Q, Nepola JV, Patterson BM. Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the United States Medicare population. Semin Arthroplasty 2023;33:331-6.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2022.12.007
  8. Lopez CD, Ding J, Peterson JR, et al. Incidental pulmonary nodules found on shoulder arthroplasty preoperative CT scans. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2022;6:24715492221090762. 
  9. Chen Y, Shah SS, Roche AM, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of incidental findings on preoperative 3D planning computed tomography for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2022;6:e21.00291 
  10. Petraszko A, Chagarlamudi K, Ramaiya N. Enhancing the value of radiology reports: a primer for residents. Emerg Radiol 2022;29:671-82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02045-1
  11. Donners R, Gutzeit A, Gehweiler JE, Manneck S, Kovacs BK, Harder D. Orthopaedic surgeons do not consult radiology reports: fact or fiction. Eur J Radiol 2021;142:109870. 
  12. Gould MK, Tang T, Liu IL, et al. Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:1208-14.  https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201505-0990OC
  13. Gould MK, Altman DE, Creekmur B, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally or by screening: a survey of radiologist awareness, agreement, and adherence from the watch the spot trial. J Am Coll Radiol 2021;18:545-53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.10.003
  14. Alpert JB, Ko JP. Management of incidental lung nodules: current strategy and rationale. Radiol Clin North Am 2018;56:339-51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2018.01.002
  15. Farjah F, Monsell SE, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Fleischner Society guideline recommendations for incidentally detected pulmonary nodules and the probability of lung cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19:1226-35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2022.06.018
  16. Spengler DM, Kirsh MM, Kaufer H. Orthopaedic aspects and early diagnosis of superior sulcus tumor of lung (Pancoast). J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:1645-50.  https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197355080-00008
  17. Bisbinas I, Langkamer VG. Pitfalls and delay in the diagnosis of Pancoast tumour presenting in orthopaedic units. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:291-5. 
  18. Ichinohe K, Ushio T, Ookawa Y, Sugiyama M, Ishihara M. Cases presenting to orthopedists with manifestations of lung cancer on skeletal radiographs. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013;23:273-9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-0984-1
  19. He YT, Zhang YC, Shi GF, et al. Risk factors for pulmonary nodules in north China: a prospective cohort study. Lung Cancer 2018;120:122-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.03.021
  20. Kwon M, Lee SH, Lee YS, et al. Clinical implications of nonspecific pulmonary nodules identified during the initial evaluation of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2017;27:3725-32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4750-y
  21. Sangani RG, Deepak V, Anwar J, Patel Z, Ghio AJ. Cigarette smoking, and blood monocyte count correlate with chronic lung injuries and mortality. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023;18:431-46.  https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S397667
  22. Dillon MT, Chan PH, Inacio MC, Singh A, Yian EH, Navarro RA. Yearly trends in elective shoulder arthroplasty, 2005-2013. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1574-81.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23167
  23. Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Anderson MJ, Ahmad CS, Levine WN, Jobin CM. Recent trends in Medicare utilization and surgeon reimbursement for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021;30:120-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.030
  24. Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:1115-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.009
  25. Leafblad N, Asghar E, Tashjian RZ. Innovations in shoulder arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2022;11:2799. 
  26. Burns DM, Frank T, Whyne CM, Henry PD. Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow 2019;11(2 Suppl):16-28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218806252
  27. Baumgarten KM, Radtke L. The accuracy of three-dimensional CT scan software in predicting prosthetic utilization in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:e223-32.  https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00641
  28. Reid JJ, Kunkle BF, Greene AT, Eichinger JK, Friedman RJ. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:302-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.011
  29. Boileau P, Cheval D, Gauci MO, Holzer N, Chaoui J, Walch G. Automated three-dimensional measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018;100:57-65.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01122
  30. Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:85-90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.011
  31. Aleem AW, Orvets ND, Patterson BC, Chamberlain AM, Keener JD. Risk of perforation is high during corrective reaming of retroverted glenoids: a computer simulation study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476:1612-9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000302
  32. Raiss P, Walch G, Wittmann T, Athwal GS. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:2123-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098
  33. Keener JD, Patterson BM, Orvets N, Aleem AW, Chamberlain AM. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:339-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011