DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discriminative Power of Seoul Cognitive Status Test in Differentiating Subjective Cognitive Decline, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia Based on CERAD-K Standards

  • Hasom Moon (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Eek-Sung Lee (Department of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Seunghee Na (Department of Neurology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Dayeong An (Happymind Clinic) ;
  • Joon Soo Shin (BeauBrain Healthcare) ;
  • Duk L. Na (Happymind Clinic) ;
  • Hyemin Jang (Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2024.06.03
  • Accepted : 2024.07.08
  • Published : 2024.07.31

Abstract

Background and Purpose: We developed a new digital cognitive assessment called Seoul Cognitive Status Test (SCST), formerly called Inbrain Cognitive Screening Test. The purpose of this study was to validate the clinical utility of the SCST by comparing its scores of those with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and dementia diagnosed by the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K). Methods: All participants (n=296) who completed the CERAD-K, SCST, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living tests were included in this study. Total score, cognitive domain scores, and subtest scores of the SCST were compared among the 3 groups (SCD, aMCI, and dementia). Additionally, correlations between SCST and CERAD-K subtests were examined. Results: Cognitive domain scores and total score of the SCST showed significant differences among the three groups, with scores being the highest in the order of SCD, aMCI, and dementia (p<0.001). Most subtests of the SCST also showed higher scores in the order of SCD, aMCI, and dementia (p<0.001). However, SCD and aMCI groups showed no significant differences in scores of the Phonemic Word Fluency Test (p=0.083) or Korean Trail Making Test-Elderly version Part A (p=0.434). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the score of Place Recognition (p=0.274) of the Word-Place Association Test between aMCI and dementia groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, differences in total score, cognitive domain scores, and subtest scores of the SCST among the 3 groups of participants diagnosed using CERAD-K confirm the clinical utility of the SCST for cognitive assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Alzheimer's Disease International. World Alzheimer report 2023: reducing dementia risk: never too early, never too late. Lincolnshire: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 21]. Available from: https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2023/. 
  2. Kim KW, Gwak KP, Kim BS, Kim BJ, Kim JR, Kim TH, et al. Nationwide Survey on Dementia Epidemiology of Korea. Seongnam: Ministry of Health and Welfare & National Institute of Dementia, 2016. 
  3. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.1.P47
  4. Kang YJ, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB-II) 2nd ed. Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2012. 
  5. Chin J, Kim DE, Lee H, Yun J, Lee BH, Park J, et al. A validation study of the Inbrain CST: a tablet computer-based cognitive screening test for elderly people with cognitive impairment. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e292.
  6. Na S, Seo SW, Kim YJ, Yoo H, Lee ES. Correlation analysis between subtest scores of CERAD-K and a newly developed tablet computer-based digital cognitive test (Inbrain CST). Front Aging Neurosci 2023;15:1178324.
  7. Na S, Lee ES, Lee TK. Diagnostic performance of a tablet computer-based cognitive screening test for identification of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Korean Med Sci 2023;38:e131.
  8. Petersen RC, Caracciolo B, Brayne C, Gauthier S, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. J Intern Med 2014;275:214-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12190
  9. Jhoo JH, Kim KW, Huh Y, Lee SB, Park JH, Lee JJ, et al. Prevalence of dementia and its subtypes in an elderly urban Korean population: results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;26:270-276. https://doi.org/10.1159/000160960
  10. Jack CR JrBennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018;14:535-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
  11. Park HK, Na DL, Han SH, Kim JY, Cheong HK, Kim SY, et al. Clinical characteristics of a nationwide hospital-based registry of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease patients in Korea: a CREDOS (Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea) study. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:1219-1226. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.9.1219
  12. Chin J, Park J, Yang SJ, Yeom J, Ahn Y, Baek MJ, et al. Re-standardization of the Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL): clinical usefulness for various neurodegenerative diseases. Dement Neurocogn Disord 2018;17:11-22. https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2018.17.1.11
  13. Kang SJ, Choi SH, Lee BH, Kwon JC, Na DL, Han SH, et al. The reliability and validity of the Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL). J Korean Neurol Assoc 2002;20:8-14. 
  14. Ku HM, Kim JH, Kwon EJ, Kim SH, Lee HS, Ko HJ, et al. A study on the reliability and validity of Seoul-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (S-IADL). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2004;43:189-199. 
  15. Woo JI, Lee DY, Kim KW, Kim SY, Kim JH, Woo SI, et al. The Korean Version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet. Seoul: Seoul National University Publication and Culture Center, 2015.