DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing the efficacy of adrenaline, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine in enhancing local anesthesia for impacted third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial

  • Akash Doshi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research) ;
  • Nitin Bhola (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research) ;
  • Anchal Agarwal (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.11
  • 심사 : 2024.07.15
  • 발행 : 2024.08.01

초록

Background: In human dentition, the most commonly impacted teeth are the mandibular third molars (M3M). The removal or extraction of these teeth often causes anxiety in patients due to the perceived pain involved in the process. Therefore, pain must be effectively managed using anesthesia. The use of newer local anesthetic drugs can help minimize side effects and drug interactions. Traditionally, adrenaline is used as a vasoconstrictor along with lignocaine. When combined with lignocaine, the alpha agonists dexmedetomidine and clonidine can extend the duration of anesthesia, thereby reducing the need for additional pain-relieving medications. Methods: This study used a randomized, triple-blind, parallel-arm design. Sixty patients were screened, and 45 systemically healthy patients requiring unilateral surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars with similar difficulty (moderate-to-difficult according to the Modified Pederson's Index) were included in the study. Patients were allocated into three groups as follows: Group A: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1:100,000 Adrenaline, Group C: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 15 ㎍/mL Clonidine, and Group D: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1 ㎍/mL Dexmedetomidine. The evaluated parameters were the time of onset of anesthesia, depth of anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters, and duration of postoperative analgesia. Results: Group D had a faster onset of action and prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia compared with Groups A and C. No statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups in terms of the depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: Group D exhibited a significantly more rapid onset of anesthesia than Groups A and C, and the postoperative analgesic effect in Group D was significantly prolonged (7.22 hours) compared with that in Groups A (4.54 hours) and C (2.1 hours). Patients receiving the Group D solution experienced an extended period of comfort without the need for analgesics for up to 7.22 hours post-procedure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars. A critical review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992 Feb; 21: 17-27.
  2. Oginni FO, Ugboko VI, Assam E, Ogunbodede EO. Postoperative complaints following impacted mandibular third molar surgery in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. SADJ 2002; 57: 264-8.
  3. Panni M, Segal S. New local anesthetics. Are they worth the cost? Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2003; 21: 19-38.
  4. Kroin JS, Buvanendran A, Williams DK, Wagenaar B, Moric M, Tuman KJ, et al. Local anesthetic sciatic nerve block and nerve fiber damage in diabetic rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010; 35: 343-50.
  5. Grewal A. Dexmedetomidine: New avenues. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011; 27: 297-302.
  6. Brummett CM, Wagner DS. The use of alpha-2 agonists in peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the history of clonidine and a look at a possible future for dexmedetomidine. Semin Anesth Perioper Med Pain 2006; 25: 84-92.
  7. Chaparro-Avendano AV, Perez-Garcia S, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity of third molar extraction in patients between 12 and 18 years of age. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005; 10: 422-31.
  8. Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Saheeb BD. A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1275-9.
  9. Glowacki D. Effective pain management and improvements in patients' outcomes and satisfaction. Crit Care Nurse 2015; 35: 33-41; quiz 43.
  10. Priyaranjan, Rohit, Dcruz TM, Patel C, Masih A, Shaik I. A comparative study evaluating the efficacy of lignocaine and dexmedetomidine with lignocaine and adrenaline in third molar surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2022; 21: 634-8.
  11. El-Boghdadly K, Brull R, Sehmbi H, Abdallah FW. Perineural dexmedetomidine is more effective than clonidine when added to local anesthetic for supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 2008-20.
  12. Sardesai SP, Patil KN, Sarkar A. Comparison of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2015; 59: 733-8.
  13. Alam S, Krishna BP, Kumaran S, Prasad SM, Lakshith Biddappa MA, Kalappa TM, et al. Clonidine: An adjuvant to adrenaline in local anesthesia for third molar surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019; 9: 235-8.
  14. Gaumann DM, Brunet PC, Jirounek P. Clonidine enhances the effects of lidocaine on C-fiber action potential. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 719-25.
  15. Kanazi GE, Aouad MT, Jabbour-Khoury SI, Al Jazzar MD, Alameddine MM, Al-Yaman R, et al. Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 222-7.
  16. Singh V, Thepra M, Kirti S, Kumar P, Priya K. Dexmedetomidine as an additive to local anesthesia: a step to development in dentistry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76: 2091.e1-2091.e7.
  17. Chatrath V, Sharan R, Khetarpal R, Bala A, Harjinder H, Sudha S, et al. Comparative evaluation of adding clonidine v/s dexmedetomidine to lignocaine during bier's block in upper limb orthopedic surgeries. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014; 3: 15511-20.