DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

일본잎갈나무림 친환경벌채지의 산림군집구조

Forest community structure of aggregated retention harvest for Larix kaempferi

  • 김호진 (국립산림과학원 산림기술경영연구소) ;
  • 이정은 (국립공주대학교 산림과학과) ;
  • 김현섭 (국립산림과학원 산림기술경영연구소) ;
  • 윤충원 (국립공주대학교 산림과학과)
  • HoJin Kim (Forest Technology and Management Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • JeongEun Lee (Department of Forest Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • HyunSeop Kim (Forest Technology and Management Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • ChungWeon Yun (Department of Forest Science, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.29
  • 심사 : 2024.06.14
  • 발행 : 2024.06.30

초록

본 연구에서는 우리나라 주요 조림수종인 일본잎갈나무 친환경벌채지를 대상으로 선정하여, 해당 조사지를 처리유형별(벌채지, 산림영향권, 군상잔존구, 수림대, 대조구)로 구분하였다. 이를 바탕으로 군집생태학적 연구를 통해 일본잎갈나무 친환경벌채지의 산림군집구조를 밝히고자 하였다. 중요치 분석을 통해 군상잔존구와 수림대는 교목층과 아교목층이 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 생물다양성 보존 측면에 효과 있는 계층구조를 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났으나 초본층에서는 벌채지와 산림영향권과 동일하게 덩굴성식물의 중요치가 높게 나타나 본 처리구역에서는 벌채지와 산림영향권에 조림된 일본잎갈나무 조림목에 성장에 저해되는 덩굴제거와 같은 시업이 존치된 교목에도 적용하는 보존 측면의 관리가 필요한 것으로 판단되었다. 종다양도는 모든 처리유형에서 높게 나타났는데 친환경벌채 후 초기 상태에서의 종다양도는 일시적 교란에 의해 다소 높게 나타난 것으로 사료되었다. Sørensen의 유사계수와 더불어 처리유형별 거리를 정량적으로 확인해 보고자 DCA 분석을 실시한 결과 벌채지와 산림영향권은 양 축을 기준으로 하여 밀집하는 경향이 나타났고, 군상잔존구, 수림대, 대조구가 밀집하는 경향으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 단발성 조사에 의한 연구 결과로 친환경벌채에 대하여 보다 정확히 판단하려면 장기적인 모니터링이 필수적으로 수행되어야 한다고 판단되었다. 또한 앞으로 장기적인 모니터링을 진행함으로써 친환경벌채의 메커니즘을 이해하고 미래의 생태계 구조변화를 평가하기 위한 정책적 기준 마련이 반드시 필요할 것으로 사료되었다.

This study aimed to provide ecological information by identifying the stand characteristics of Larix kaempferi forest vegetation (deforestation, forest influence, patch, forest) for aggregated retention harvest in Mt. Nambyeongsan, Pyeongchang-Gun. Data were collected using the Braun-Blanquet vegetation survey method from July 2020, with 54 quadrats analyzed for importance value, species diversity, similarity index, and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA). The results showed that vine species had a higher importance value in the deforestation area and forest influence area. Forest regions had the highest species diversity (2.419), while the forest influence area had the lowest(2.171). The similarity index was highest between the forest region and patch area (0.723), and lowest between the patch area and forest influence area (0.658), which was consistent with the DCA results. In conclusion, although species diversity temporarily showed higher values in the initial stage after aggregated retention harvest, it was difficult to assign ecologically specific meanings to these values. Long-term monitoring is therefore necessary to accumulate ecological information on aggregated retention harvests.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국립산림과학원 연구사업(SC0400-2017-03; SC0500-2020-01) 지원에 의하여 이루어졌습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Barbour MG, JH Buck and WD Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology, 2nd ed. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company. CA, USA. pp. 155-229.
  2. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964 Pflanwensoziologie Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag. New York.
  3. Byeon SY. 2021. A study on the community structure and regeneration features in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carriere natural regeneration stands. Ph.D. Dissertation. Kongju National University. Yesan, Korea.
  4. Byeon SY and CW Yun. 2018. Understory species composition and Pinus densiflora natural regeneration in Pinus densiflora stands regenerated by Seed-tree method. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 107:25-34. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2018.107.1.25
  5. Cho MG, JM Chung, HR Jung, MY Kang and HS Moon. 2012. Vegetation structure of Taxus cuspidata communities in subalpine zone. J. Agric. Life Sci. 46:1-10.
  6. Cox GW. 1972. Laboratory Manual of General Ecology. William C Brown Publishers. Dububque, IA, USA.
  7. Dierssen K. 1990. Einfuhrung in die Pflanzensoziologie. Akadmie Verlag. Berlin, Germany.
  8. Ellenberg H. 1956. Aufgaben and Methoden der Vegetationskunde. Ulmer. Stuttgart, Germany.
  9. Franklin CMA, SE Macdonald and SE Nielsen. 2018. Combining aggregated and dispersed tree retention harvesting for conservation of vascular plant communities. Ecol. Appl. 28:1830-1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1774
  10. Franklin JF and DC Donato. 2020. Variable retention harvesting in the Douglas-fir region. Ecol.. Process 9:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019-0205-5
  11. Hill MO. 1979. TWINSPAN: A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University. Ithaca, New York.
  12. Hong SC, SH Byun and SS Kim. 1987. Colored Illustrations of Tree and Shrub in Korea. Gyemyeongsa. Seoul, Korea.
  13. Jang JS, H Kim and JI Jeon. 2019. The New Dendrology. Hyangmunsa. Seoul, Korea.
  14. Jeon SW, WK Song, MJ Lee and BJ Kang. 2010. Improvement of the environmental conservation value assessment map (ECVAM) by complement of the vegetation community stability item. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 13:114-123.
  15. Kim DS, HS Kim, JY Lee, SY Kim, JS Kweon, DM Kim, SJ Park, SY Kim, JH Jeong and BK Byun. 2020a. Investigation of vegetation and insect in Green Tree Retention, Mokgye-ri, Wangsan-myeon, Gangneung, Korea. p. 49. In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference. Vol. 30.
  16. Kim MS, JS Kim, HS Kim, CW Park and KH Bae. 2020b. Changes in community structure of understory vegetation by silvicultural treatments in a Larix kaempferi plantation forest. J. Agric. Life Sci. 54:23-33. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.2.25
  17. Kim HJ. 2023. Forest community structure and early growth characteristics of planted tree in aggregated retention harvest (ARH) area. Ph.D. Dissertation. Kongju Natinal University. Yesan, Korea.
  18. Kim HJ, JK Shin, CH Lee and CW Yun. 2017. Community structure of forest vegetation in Mt. Geumsusan belong to Woraksan National Park. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 31:202219. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.2.202
  19. Kim MS, JS Kim, HS Kim, CW Park and KH Bae. 2020c. Changes in community structure of understory by silvicultural treatments in a Larix kaempferi plantation forest. J. Agric. Life Sci. 54:22-33.
  20. KFS. 2014a. Korea Biodiversity Information System. Korea Forest Service. http://www.nature.go.kr. Accessed June 11, 2024.
  21. KFS. 2014b. Korea Plant Names Index Committee. Korea Forest Service. http://www.nature.go.kr. Accessed June 11, 2024.
  22. KFS. 2021. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Korea Forest Service. Daejeon, Korea.
  23. KMGL. 2018. Administrative Rule. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Sejong, Korea. https://www.law.go.kr/. Accessed June 11, 2024.
  24. Krebs CJ. 1985. Ecology. 3rd Edition. Haber and Row Publishing Company. New York.
  25. Lee JE, JK Shin, DK Kim and CW Yun. 2018. Classification of forest vegetation for forest genetic resource reserve area in Heuksando island. Korean J. Env. Eco. 32:289-302. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.3.289
  26. Lee TB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa. Seoul, Korea.
  27. Lee WY, EJ Park, SU Han and BS Park. 2012. Characteristics Improvement of Flowering and Fruiting in Larix kaempferi. National Institute of Forest Science. Seoul, Korea.
  28. Miyawaki A. 1977. Vegetation of Japan, Gakken. Tokyo, Japan.
  29. Miyawaki A. 1984. Vegetation of Japan, Jimundang. Tokyo, Japan.
  30. Park EH, JG Kim, JH Lee, HS Cho and JK Min. 2004. Vegetation of liana dominating in the vicinity of Onsan industrial complex. Korean J. Ecol. 27:335-345. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2004.27.6.335
  31. Park KS, SY Lee, SW Bae, MH Kim, HS Kim, KS Baik and KW An. 2011. A study on recognition of forest official's stakeholders's toward improvement of tree cutting permit system. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 100:292-304.
  32. Park KS, SY Lee, IH Choi, HS Kim, YS Ahn and KW An. 2012. Improvement of a tree cutting permit system with respect to timber logger's consciousness. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 101:710-721.
  33. Shin HS, JK Shin, HJ Kim, SH Han, WH Lee and CW Yun. 2014. Characteristics of community structure of forest vegetation on Manisan, Ganghwado. Korean J. Agric. For. Met. 16:11-21.
  34. Shim KK, YH Ahn and MS Yoo. 1985. Studies on photosynthesis of perennial vines (Actinidia arguta, Celastrus orbiculatus, Lonicera japonica, Lonicera japonica var. aureoreticulata, Lonicera semperviens). J. Korean Soc. Hortic. Sci. 26:44-50.
  35. Yun CW. 2016. Field Guide to Trees and Shrubs. Geobook. Seoul, Korea.