Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Learning Effectiveness of Students Who Took New and Renewable Energy Courses

신재생에너지 분야 교과목 수강생의 학습 효과성 분석

  • Choi, Jeehyun (New Energy Industry-Convergence Open Sharing Center, Korea University)
  • 최지현 (고려대학교 에너지신산업 혁신융합대학사업단)
  • Received : 2024.03.18
  • Accepted : 2024.04.29
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the learning effectiveness of students who took courses in the field of new and renewable energy, which have been operated within a convergence university system. To achieve this, data were collected from 1,228 students who participated in 34 courses jointly developed and conducted by seven universities as part of standard curriculum offerings. The study analyzed learning effectiveness (course satisfaction, transfer motivation, learning transfer, creativity-convergence competency) using Excel 2018 and SPSS 25.0. It also examined inter-university differences in learning effectiveness and identified factors influencing creativity-convergence competency. The main findings are as follows: (a) Course satisfaction (M= 4.20), transfer motivation (M=3.62), learning transfer (M= 4.06), and creativity-convergence competency (M=3.92) were generally high. (b) Analysis of learning effectiveness differences between universities showed no significant differences among universities A, B, C, D, and E. University F was lower compared to other universities, while University G was significantly higher than others. (c) Sex, grade, number of courses taken, course satisfaction, transfer motivation, and learning transfer had effect on creativity-convergence competency. The results of this study provided implications for promoting activities to attract students, expanding transfer opportunities, and ensuring student agency.

Keywords

References

  1. 고홍월(2012). 대학생 학습동기 유형에 따른 학업소진과 학업적 실패내성의 차이. 아시아교육연구, 13(1), 125-147.
  2. 국가법령정보센터(2024.01.19. 검색). 신에너지 및 재생에너지 개발.이용.보급 촉진법(신재생에너지법) 제2조(정의). https://www.law.go.kr/법령/신에너지및재생에너지개발.이용.보급촉진법
  3. 김영롱.양승원.소금현(2016). STEAM을 적용한 신재생에너지 학습 프로그램이 초등학생의 환경소양 및 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향. 환경교육, 29(1), 66-78.
  4. 김정원.조대연(2023). 창의융합역량 진단도구 개발 연구. 문화와융합, 45(10), 1029-1045.
  5. 김준희.김은비.이윤수(2020). 한국 대기업 내 교육훈련특성, 전이동기, 학습전이와의 관계에서 업무성과-보상 기대가 미치는 조절된 매개효과 연구. HRD연구, 22(4), 102-123.
  6. 김진희 외(2017). 대학생의 생활과 문화: 학업과 진로를 중심으로. 한국교육개발원. RR2017-11.
  7. 김형욱(2023). 에너지 절약 실천을 위한 초등학교 교육과정 재구성 사례 및 효과: 기후변화 인식, 태도 및 에너지 절약 태도를 중심으로. 환경교육, 36(4), 358-374.
  8. 박기문.이규녀(2011). 공과대학생들의 학습성과(PO)에 대한 교육요구도 사례 연구. 공학교육연구, 14(3), 38-44.
  9. 이미옥.김세영.이미영(2015). 대학생의 자율성지지와 자기조절 동기가 학습성과에 미치는 영향. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 16(8), 5223-5231.
  10. 이성희.조헌국(2015). 에너지, 기후변화 교육성과에 관한 국내 사례 조사 연구. 에너지기후변화교육, 5(2), 227-237.
  11. 임경민.유병길(2017). 에너지 절약 시범학교에서 실시한 프로그램의 교육적 효과에 대한 연구. 에너지기후변화교육, 7(2), 213-220.
  12. 진성희.김재희(2017). 공학전공 학생들의 융합역량 증진을 위한 교육프로그램 개발 및 효과. 공학교육연구, 20(6), 12-21.
  13. Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C.(2022). The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: Bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959-2020). Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(1), 36-63.
  14. Kim, J., Bates, R. A., & Song, J. H.(2019). Validation of the learning transfer system inventory (LTSI) in the Korean corporate context. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 217-234.
  15. Kirkpatrick D. L.(1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Derectors, 13(1), 3-9.
  16. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N.(1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel psychology, 39(3), 497-523.
  17. OECE(2019). OECD Future of education and skills 2030. OECD.
  18. Praslova, L.(2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 215-225.
  19. Rouiller, J. Z., & Goldstein, I. L.(1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(4), 337-390.