과제정보
이 논문은 2023년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2023S1A5A2A01075381).
참고문헌
- Beak, Il (2017). Korean film distribution problems and solutions. Marxist Studies, 14(3), 169-204. https://doi.org/0.26587/marx.14.3.201708.007
- Cha, Seong-Hoon & Kim, Hoon-Min (2009). Understanding market structure. Click Economy Education, 70. Available: https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/material/clickView.do?click_yymm=200906&cidx=1033 1033
- Cho, Young-shin & Lee, Seon-mi (2010). Analysis of media market concentration by market definition. Journal of Cyber Communication, 27(2), 215-252.
- Infomax. (2012, December 24). CR, Concentration Ratio. Available: https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=48750
- Kim, Jun-hyuk, Lee, Nam-woo, & Seo, Deok-rok (2016). Analysis of multidisciplinary research characteristics of Korean international academic papers using diversity indicators. Convergence Research Review, 2(2), 34-79.
- Lee, Jae-woo & Jang, Young-jae (2000). Is the Herfindahl index superior to the CRk concentration index: hypothesis verification and policy implications. Economic Research, 48(1), 5-33.
- Park, Joo-yeon & Jeon, Beomsu (2009). Research on diversity in the media market: focusing on measuring market concentration. Journal of Journalism and Information Studies, 46(1), 37-61. http://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2009.46.1.37
- Park, No-kyung (2002). Bank merger and market concentration analysis: CR4 and H-H analysis focus. Industrial Economics Research, 15(1), 152-142.
- Seong, wook-je (2010). A diversity study by measuring the usage intensity of domestic current affairs information media. Broadcasting and Communication Research, 72, 194-225. http://doi.org/10.22876/kjbtr.2010.72.007
- Yang, Hyun-chae, Seong, gyeon-gmo, Shin, Eun-jeong, & Kim Young-rin (2018). Institutional Reinterpretation and Response to Competition and Limiting Effects in the Government R&D System. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
- Bromberg, M. (2023). Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) Definition, formula, and example. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hhi.asp
- Chang, Y. W. & Nabavi, M. (2024). Comparison of disciplines, topics, and methods in studies in Journal of Informetrics and Scientometrics from 2016 to 2020. Scientometrics, 129, 1415-1439. https://doi-org-ssl.access.inu.ac.kr/10.1007/s11192-024-04947-y
- Cho, J. (2021). Analysis of global inequality in research outcome using the Gini coefficient. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 22(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2020-0027
- Clarivate (2021). Indicator Handbook. Available: https://incites.help.clarivate.com/Content/Indicators-Handbook/ih-about.htm
- CWTS. (2024). Scientometrics Using Open Data. Available: https://www.cwts.nl/education/cwts-course-program/scientometrics-using-open-data
- Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2018). A macro level scientometric analysis of world tribology research output. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1410/1410.1625.pdf
- Feyzabadi, VY., Mehrolhassani, MH., & Pourhosseini, SS. (2019). Measuring research inequality in medical sciences universities of Iran from 2008 to 2017: a descriptive study. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 27-39.
- Hsiao, TM. & Chen, Kh. (2020). The dynamics of research subfields for library and information science: an investigation based on word bibliographic coupling. Scientometrics, 125, 717-737. https://doi-org-ssl.access.inu.ac.kr/10.1007/s11192-020-03645-9
- Huang, M., Chang, H., & Chen, D. (2012). The trend of concentration in scientific research and technological innovation: a reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research & technology. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.03.003
- Huang, M., Shaw, W.-C., & Lin, C.-S. (2019). One category, two communities: subfield differences in "Information Science and Library Science." Scientometrics, 119(2), 1059-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03074-3
- Jeon, J. & Kim, S.Y. (2018). Is the gap widening among universities? on research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system. Quallty & Quantity, 52, 589-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0652-y
- Kwiek, M. (2021). The prestige economy of higher education journals: a quantitative approach higher education. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 81(3), 493-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y
- Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21011
- Leydesdorff, L. & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? a global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1830-4
- Merton, R. K. (1968). Matthew effect in science: reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
- Ni, C. & Ding, Y. (2010). Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701202
- Park, E. & Kim, W. (2021). Inequality in scientific impact: evidence from the hospitality and tourism literature. Tourism & Leisure Research, 33(2), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2021.2.33.2.385
- Sin, S. (2006). Are library and information science journals becoming more internationalized?: a longitudinal study of authors' geographical affiliations in 20 lis journals from 1981 to 2003. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504201201
- Wu, J. (2015). Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.007
- Xie, Y., Wu, Q., Zhang, P., & Li, X. (2020). Information Science and Library Science (IS-LS) journal subject categorization and comparison based on editorship information. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101069
- Yu, B. & Shu, F. (2023). The Matthew Effect in China's social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI. Scientometrics, 128, 6177-6193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y
- Zhi, Q. & Meng, T. (2016). Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China. Scientometrics, 106, 603-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1773-5