Analyses & Alternatives (분석과 대안)

Korea Consensus Institute(KCI) (사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Cohort Effects of Unification Consciousness of South Korean

통일의식에 대한 코호트 효과 분석에 관한 연구

  • Dongsun Kang (Office of Employment Policy Evaluation, Korea Employment Information Service) ;
  • Kyoungbong Woo (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)
  • 강동선 (한국고용정보원, 일자리사업평가팀) ;
  • 우경봉 (한국방송통신대학교, 무역학과)
  • Received : 2024.05.21
  • Accepted : 2024.06.12
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The recent trend of declining consciousness regarding the necessity of unification among South Korean citizens is evident. Does a cohort effect exist in this downward trend in the perception of the necessity of unification? The purpose of this study is to analyze whether birth cohorts statistically significantly influence the consciousness of the necessity of unification. To this end, the hierarchical age-period-cohort (HAPC) model was employed as the analytical model, and data from the Unification Consciousness Survey conducted by Seoul National University's Institute for Peace and Unification Studies from 2007 to 2021 was used. The analysis results showed evidence that the progress of economic inequality at the birth cohort level affected the decline in the perception of the necessity of unification. The 1980s birth cohort, which faced socioeconomic difficulties during their social advancement due to income and wealth polarization, is observed to have a distinctly negative perception of unification requiring massive financial resources, compared to the 1960s and 1970s birth cohorts.

최근 한국 국민의 통일필요 의식의 하락 추세는 선명하다. 통일필요 의식 하락 추세에 있어 출생 코호트 효과는 존재하는가? 본 연구의 목적은 통일필요 의식에 있어 출생 코호트가 통계적으로 유의미한 영향을 미치는지 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 분석모형으로 위계적 연령-기간-코호트(HAPC) 모형을 채용하였으며 2007~2021년 기간 서울대학교 통일평화연구원의 통일의식조사 데이터를 사용하였다. 분석 결과, 출생 코호트 수준에서 경제불평등의 진행이 통일 필요성 인식 하락에 영향을 미쳤다는 증거가 관찰되었다. 소득과 자산의 양극화 진행으로 인해 사회 진출 과정에서 사회경제적 어려움을 겪은 1980년대 출생 코호트는 막대한 재원이 투입되는 남북통일에 대해, 1960년대와 1970년대 출생 코호트와 비교해 선명하게 부정적인 인식을 가지는 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Korea National Open University Research Fund.

References

  1. Baltes, Paul B. (1968). Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects. Human Development 11(3): 145-171. 
  2. Byeon, Jong-Heon. (2012). The task of unification education at colleges. Unification Policy Studies 21(1): 157-186. 
  3. Chauvel, Louis. (2013). 'Welfare regimes, cohorts and the middle classes'. in J. C. Gornick & M. Jantti (eds.). Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries. Stanford University Press: 115-141. 
  4. Chauve, Louis, & Schroder, Martin. (2015). The impact of cohort membership on disposable incomes in West Germany, France, and the United States. European Sociological Review 31(3): 298-311. 
  5. Firpo, Sergio, Fortin, Nocole M., & Lexieux, Thomas. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3): 953-973. 
  6. Firpo, Sergio, Fortin, Nocole M., & Lexieux, Thomas. (2018). Decomposing wage distributions using recentered influence function regressions. Econometrics 6(2): 1-40. 
  7. Glenn, Norval D. (2005). Cohort analysis. Sage. 
  8. Greene, William H. (2018). Econometric analysis. Pearson. 
  9. Ha, Joonkyung. (2012). An economic analysis of low fertility in Korea: Focusing on income inequality and cost of education. The Review of Social & Economic Studies 39: 137-174. 
  10. Hampel, Frank R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69(346): 383-393. 
  11. Han, Kwansoo, & Jang, Yoonsoo. (2012). A study on the ideological debates over North Korea with the progressive and conservative in South Korea. Korean Political Science Review 46(1): 63-88. 
  12. Heckman, James, & Robb, Richard. (1985). 'Using longitudinal data to estimate age, period, and cohort effects in earnings equations' in W. M. Mason & S. E. Fienberg (eds). Cohort analysis in social research. Springer-Verlag: 137-150. 
  13. Hong, Minki. (2015). Top incomes in Korea (1958-2013). Journal of Korean Economic Development 21(4): 1-34. 
  14. Jeong, Jun Ho. (2022). The causes and effects of surge in apartment sales prices during the Moon Jae-In Administration period. Economy and Society 135: 70-117. 
  15. Jung, Dong-Joon. (2017). Does economic evaluation affect South Koreans' attitudes toward unification?: An analysis of the 2007-2017 unification perception surveys. Discourse 201 20(3): 157-195. 
  16. Kim, B. S. et al. (2022). Unification Perception Survey 2021. The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies Seoul National University. 
  17. Kim, Byeon Jo. (2015). Korean perception to the unification during 2007~2015: Focused on generation gap and intra-generation differentiation. Journal of Peace and Unification Studies 7(2): 3-41. 
  18. Kim, Heuijeong, & Kim, Sun. (2018). Unification consciousness and unification education by generation: Emotion regulation approach. Unification Humanities 76: 233-254. 
  19. Kim, Kyoochul. (2022). Inter-Korean relations and unification perception in South Korea. Journal of Peace and Unification Studies 14(2): 39-78. 
  20. Kim, K. Y. (2021). "Only 4 out of 10 citizens say 'unification is necessary'... lowest record since the survey". YONHAP NEWS. Retrieved from https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20211005109300504 
  21. Kim, Nak Nyeon. (2023). Functional income distribution in Korea: Labor productivity, wages, and labor income share. The Korean Economic Forum 16(2): 1-36. 
  22. Kim, Nak Nyeon, & Kim, Jongil. (2013). Reexamining the indices of income distribution in Korea. Journal of Korean Economic Analysis (JKEA) 19(2): 1-64. 
  23. Korea Labor Institute. (2022). Korean Labor and Income Panel Study. 1-24 wave. https://www.kli.re.kr/board.es?mid=a40402000000&bid=0019&act=view&list_no=137458&tag=&nPage=1 
  24. La Grange A and Jung HN. (2004). The commodification of land and housing: the case of South Korea. Housing Studies 19(4): 557-580. 
  25. Lee, Kang-Kook. (2019). Inequality and economic development. Journal of Korean Economic Development 25(4): 31-74. 
  26. Lee, Na-Young. (2014). What determines Korean perception and attitude on national unification?: Searching for the new analytical model. Peace Studies 22(1): 167-206. 
  27. Lim, H. T. (2018). 90s are coming. Whale Book.
  28. Linek, Lukas, & Petrusek, Ivan. (2016). What's past is prologue, or is it? Generational effects on voter turnout in post-communist countries, 1990-2013. Electoral Studies 42: 78-90. 
  29. Mannheim, Karl. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 
  30. Mason, Karen Oppenheim, Mason, William M. Winsborough H. H., & Poole, W. Kenneth. (1973). Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review 38: 242-258. 
  31. Park, G. S., Hahm, I. H., & Cho, D. Y. (2005). Generational experiences and culture of modern Koreans. Jipmoondang. 
  32. Park, J. H. (2005). Generation issues in Korea: Beyond differences and conflicts. Nanam. 
  33. Park, M. K. et al. (2008). Unification Perception Survey 2007. The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies Seoul National University. 
  34. Park, M. K. et al. (2013). Unification Perception Survey 2012. The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies Seoul National University. 
  35. Robertson, Chris, Gandini, Sara, & Boyle, Peter. (1999). Age-period-cohort models: A comparative study of available methodologies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52(6): 569-83. 
  36. Ronald R and Doling J. (2010). Shifting East Asian approaches to home ownership and the housing welfare pillar. International Journal of Housing Policy 10(3): 233-254. 
  37. Schaie, Klaus Warner. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin. 64(2): 92-107. 
  38. Schuman, Howard, & Scott, Jacqueline. (1989). Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review 54(3) 359-381. 
  39. Shin, Kwanho, & Shin, Donggyun. (2007). Bi-Polarization of the income distribution and its socio-economic consequences in Korea. Journal of Korean Economic Analysis (JKEA) 13(1): 63-124. 
  40. Wilmoth, John R. (1990). Variation in vital rates by age, period, and cohort. Sociological Methodology 20: 295-335. 
  41. Woo, Kyoungbong. (2022). An empirical study of age effect on awareness for Korean unification: Evidence from 2020 Seoul, Incheon, Gyeonggi survey data. Analyses & Alternatives 6(1): 7-33. 
  42. Woo, S. H., & Park, K. I. (2007). 880,000 Won Generation: Economics of hope in a generation of despair. Redian. 
  43. Yang, Yang, & Land, Kenneth C. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys: Trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology 36: 75-97. 
  44. Yang, Yang, & Land, Kenneth C. (2008). Age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, fixed or random effects. Sociological Methods & Research 36(3): 297-326. 
  45. Yang, Yang, & Land, Kenneth C. (2013). Age-period-cohort analysis: New models, methods, and empirical applications. CRC Press. 
  46. Yi, Seong-Woo. (2013). Cognition on reunification conditions as major factors affecting reunification cognition. Journal of Peace and Unification Studies 5(1): 115-153.