DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pre-service Science Teachers' Efficacy for Inclusive Practices

예비 과학교사의 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감

  • Junhee Kim (Daegu University) ;
  • Sungmin Im (Daegu University) ;
  • Sojin Lee (Daegu University)
  • 김준희 (대구대학교) ;
  • 임성민 (대구대학교) ;
  • 이소진 (대구대학교)
  • Received : 2024.04.24
  • Accepted : 2024.05.27
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

The demand for inclusive education in school settings has been constantly increasing. Yet, within the context of general subject teacher education, rather than special teacher education, preparation for this remains insufficient. This study aims to investigate and analyze the teacher efficacy for inclusive practices of pre-service science teachers with a focus on identifying differences based on respondent variables. In this research, teacher efficacy for inclusive practices is defined as self-belief in the ability to effectively teach students, including students with disabilities, in inclusive educational environments. It encompasses three sub-dimensions: efficacy in using inclusive instruction, efficacy in collaboration, and efficacy in dealing with disruptive behaviors. Utilizing data from 61 pre-service science teachers using 'Teacher' Efficacy for Inclusive Practices' survey tool, this study examines the distribution of teacher efficacy in inclusive practice across sub-dimensions and differences in distribution based on respondent background. The findings indicate that pre-service science teachers show a generally positive state across all three sub-dimensions, with efficacy to use inclusive instructions and efficacy in collaboration being the highest and efficacy in dealing with disruptive behaviors the lowest. he teachers' efficacy for inclusive practices of pre-service science teachers exhibited some tendencies of difference based on gender, experience with volunteering for individuals with disabilities, experience with inclusive education, and the extent of coursework in special education. However, none of these factors showed statistically significant differences.

학교교육에서 통합교육에 대한 요구는 점차 증가하고 있으나 특수 교육 전공이 아닌 일반 교과교육 맥락의 예비교사교육에서 이에 대한 준비는 여전히 부족하다. 이 연구에서는 예비 과학교사의 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감을 조사하고 응답자 변인에 따른 차이점을 분석함으로써 통합교육 환경을 대비하는 과학교사교육에 대한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 이 연구에서 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감이란 통합교육 환경에서 장애학생을 포함한 학생들을 잘 가르칠 수 있는 실천 능력에 대한 자기 믿음으로 정의되며, 이는 통합교수 효능감, 협력 효능감, 문제행동중재 효능감의 3가지 하위 차원으로 구성된다. 이 연구에서는 '통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감(Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices)' 검사 도구를 활용하여 예비 과학교사 총 61명의 응답 자료를 얻었으며, 이 자료로부터 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감의 하위 요인별 분포와 응답자의 배경 변인에 따른 분포의 차이를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 예비 과학교사들의 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감은 모든 하위 차원에서 다소 긍정적으로 나타났으며 상대적으로 통합교수 효능감과 협력 효능감이 높고 문제행동중재 효능감이 가장 낮았다. 예비 과학교사의 성별, 장애인 봉사 경험, 통합교육 경험, 특수교육학 과목 이수 정도에 따른 교사효능감은 집단에 따른 차이의 일부 경향성은 보이지만 모든 하위 차원에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 나타나지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmmed, M., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2012). Variables affecting teachers'attitudes towards inclusive education in Bangladesh. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(3), 132-140.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  3. Alsarawi, A., & Sukonthaman, R. (2021). Preservice Teachers'Attitudes, Knowledge, and Self-Efficacy of Inclusive Teaching Practices. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 70(5), 705-721.
  4. Ashton, P. T. & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a differ- ence: Teachers sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  5. Baek, S. (2017). Pre-service Science Education Teachers' Perceptions of Attitudes toward Inclusion and Their Science Teaching Efficacy. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilition Science, 56(1), 121-143.
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  7. Burns, M., Storey, K., & Certo, N. J. (1999). Effect of service learning on attitudes towards students with severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 58-65.
  8. Carter, E. W., Hughes, C., Copeland, S. R., & Breen, C. (2001). Differences between High School Students Who Do and Do Not Volunteer to Participate in a Peer Interaction Program. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26(4), 229-239.
  9. Choi, M., & Shin, H. (2012). A research synthesis in science education for students with disabilities in Korea. Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 267-289.
  10. Gibson, S., Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
  11. Huh, Y., & Park, S. (2012). The Impacts of Multimedia Anchored Instruction on the Teaching Competencies of General Education Pre-service Teachers for Students with Special Needs. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9(1), 1-25.
  12. Im, S., Cha, J., & Kim, H. B. (2018). A Case Study on Science Education for Students with Special Educational Needs and the Change of Pre-Service Science Teachers' Attitude Towards Disability and Inclusive. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(1), 87-96.
  13. Im, S., & Lee, Y. (2011). Pre-service Science Teachers' Self-Efficacy on Science Teaching for the Disabled Students. Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 13-22.
  14. Im, S., Park, K., & Gankhuyag, E. (2019). Analysis of social distance toward persons with disabilities of pre-service teachers who experienced a science fair for the students with disabilities. The Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 101-125.
  15. Ji, E., Shin, Y. J. (2015). The effect of college students' sense of social distance from people with disabilities on perspectives toward inclusive education: The mediating effects of interactions with people with disabilities. Special Education Research, 14(1), 205-225.
  16. Kang, D., & Martin, S. N. (2017). Examining the Impact of an Experiential Learning Special Education Course on Pre-Service Science Teachers' Perceptions About Inclusive Science Education. Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 327-356.
  17. Kim, M., & Park, J. (2018) Analysis of Factors Influencing University Student's Attitudes toward University Students with Disabilities. The Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 49-72.
  18. Knoblauch, D. & Woolfolk, H. A. (2008). Maybe I can teach those kids: The influence of contextual factors on student teachers' efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166-179.
  19. Krajewski, J., & Flaherty, T. (2000). Attitudes of high school students toward individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 38(2), 154-162.
  20. Lancaster, J., & Bain, A. (2010). The design of pre-service inclusive education courses and their effects on self-efficacy: A comparative study. Asia-pacific Journal of Teacher Educaion, 38(2), 117-128.
  21. Lee, S., & Park, E. (2011) Teaching exceptional children in inclusive setting. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  22. Lee, Y., & Im, S. (2010). An investigation of pre-service special teachers' self-efficacy on teaching and learning science for the disabled students. Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 203-216.
  23. Ministry of Education (2023). Annaul report of Special Education. Retrieved on September 24, 2023, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nise.go.kr/ebook/site/20230908_150026/
  24. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2007). Key Provisions of Proposed Legislative Amendments and Ministry of Education Guidelines for Strenthening Non-Exam-Based Teacher Qualification Standards. Retrieved on September 24, 2023, from the World Wide Web: https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=141&boardSeq=3407&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=C&page=1&s=moe&m=040401&opType
  25. Park, C., Hwang, S., & Han, S. (2012). Secondary School Student Teachers' Perceptions Toward Inclusion. The Journal of Special Children Education, 14(2), 381-395.
  26. Park, N. R. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Support Program for the Integration of Handicapped Children on Teaching Efficacy of Daycare Center Teachers. Korean Journal of Child Education & Care, 18(4), 247-265.
  27. Ryu, H. (2002). Attitudes toward Inclusion among Pre-Service Training Teachers:Comparison of Elementary and Secondary Education College Students, Master's thesis, Kongju National University.
  28. Seo, H., & Park, Y. (2018). An Analysis of Changes and Relations among Perceptions on Inclusive Education, Instructional Adaptation, and Teacher Efficacy of General Education Pre-service Teachers Through the Introduction to Special Education Course. Special Education Research, 17(3), 103-125.
  29. Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Reasearch in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12-21.
  30. Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can teachers' self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes toward inclusion scores predict their actual inclusive classroom practices?. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 21-38.
  31. Song, J., & Choi, H. (2018) The Validation of Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) Scale for Korean Pre-service General Teachers, KJSE, 52(4), 49-67.
  32. Specht, J., McGhie-Richmond, D., Loreman, T., Mirenda, P., Bennett, S., et al. (2016). Teaching in inclusive classrooms: Efficacy and beliefs of Canadian presevice teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 1-15.
  33. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk, H. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
  34. Woo, S., & Kim, S. (2016). Attitudinal Patterns of General Students with a Long Term Inclusive Education. The Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(2), 1-23