Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research (대한의용생체공학회:의공학회지)

The Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering (대한의용생체공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploratory Study on Sympathetic Skin Response to Physical and Psychological Stimulation

신체적 자극과 심리적 자극에서 교감신경피부반응에 대한 탐색연구

  • Gi-Ryun Kim (PhysioLab Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Dong-Keun Jung (Department of Medical Engineering, College of Medicine, Dong-A University)
  • 김기련 ((주)피지오랩) ;
  • 정동근 (동아대학교 의과대학 의공학교실)
  • Received : 2024.01.26
  • Accepted : 2024.02.15
  • Published : 2024.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we explored the possibility of using sympathetic skin response (SSR), a type of electrodermal activity (EDA), as a method of evaluating a subject's responsiveness to physical or psychological stimulation. To provide physical and psychological stimulation, walking on an acupressure plate and a roller coaster virtual reality experience wearing an HMD (head mounted display) were used. Walking on an acupressure plate significantly increased the SSR signal compared to walking on the bare floor. Additionally, it was observed that the SSR response significantly increased while the subject was wearing an HMD and experiencing a roller coaster compared to the resting state of sitting on a chair. The SSR response to physical or psychological stimulation increased in all subjects, but the degree of reactivity differed. These experimental results suggested that sympathetic skin response (SSR) is a useful tool as a biosignal that can be used to evaluate the human body's responsiveness to physical stimulation or psychological stimulation using virtual reality.

Keywords

References

  1. Ellaway PH, Kuppuswamy A, Nicotra A, Mathias CJ. Sweat production and the sympathetic skin response: Improving the clinical assessment of autonomic function. Auton Neurosci. 2010;155:109-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2010.01.008
  2. Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: Basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res. 2003;13:256-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-003-0107-5
  3. Montagna P, Liguori R, Zappia M. Sympathetic skin response. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48:489-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.48.5.489-b
  4. Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, Boulu P, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:536-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.47.5.536
  5. Day TJ, Offerman D, Bajada S. Peripheral sympathetic conduction velocity calculated from surface potentials. Clin Exp Neurol. 1986;22:41-6.
  6. Frexia I, Baque E, Catteau MC, Miossec Y, Roy JC. Asymmetry of electrodermal activity. Biol Psychol. 1984;18:219-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(84)90004-8
  7. Neumann E. Blanton R. The early history of electrodermal research. Psychophysiology. 1970;6:453-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1970.tb01755.x
  8. Martini F, Bartholomew E. Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings; 2001.
  9. Carlson N. Physiology of Behavior. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2013.
  10. Lee HJ, Tae KS. Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Exercise on Scoliometer and Muscle Activity. J Biomed Eng Res. 2017;38:336-41.
  11. Lee JS, Kim JY. A Study on Spatial Characteristics of Immersion and Reality in Cases of VR and AR Technology and Contents. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal. 2019;28(3):13-24. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2019.28.3.013
  12. Boucsein W. Electrodermal Activity 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
  13. Hellerud BC, Storm H. Skin conductance and behaviour during sensory stimulation of preterm and term infants. Early Hum Dev. 2002;70(1):35-46.
  14. Lim CL, Gordon E, Harris A, Bahramali H, Li WM, Manor B, Rennie C. Electrodermal activity in schizophrenia: a quantitative study using a short interstimulus paradigm. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):127-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00056-0
  15. Bruggemann JM, Barry RJ. Eysenck's P as a modulator of affective and electrodermal responses to violent and comic film. Pers Individ Dif. 2002;32(6):1029-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00108-8
  16. Brand G, Millot JL, Saffaux M, Morand-Villeneuve N. Lateralization in human nasal chemoreception: differences in bilateral electrodermal responses related to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli. Behav Brain Res. 2002;133(2):205-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00474-0
  17. Ogorevc J, Gersak G, Novak D, Drnovsek J. Metrological evaluation of skin conductance measurements. Measurement. 2013;46(9):2993-3001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.024
  18. Fowles DC, Edelberg R, Lykken DT, Venables PH. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements : committee report. Psychophysiology. 1981;18:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x
  19. Baba M, Watahiki Y, Matsunaga M, Takeba K. Sympathetic skin response in healthy man. Electromyogr Clin Neuro-physiol. 1988;28:277-83.
  20. Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential: a quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J Neurol Sci. 1985;67:239-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(85)90120-0
  21. Kim DS, Park YG, Im SH, Kim DH, Song MH, Kim HK, Choi WA. The effect of circadian rhythm on sympathetic skin response. J Korean EMG Electrodiagn Med. 2008;10(2):113-7.  https://doi.org/10.18214/jkaem.2008.10.2.113