I. Introduction
Recommendation systems are widely used by E-commerce sites to suggest products to their customers, matching multiple products to multiple customers. It significantly helps E-commerce sites to sell their large commodity products more efficiently by providing customized services [1]. Recent theoretical developments have revealed that increasing complexity and exploding digital data have resulted in the generation of numerous recommendation systems. Besides some fundamental recommendation systems, hybrid recommendation systems and advancements in machine learning have contributed to the success of recommendation systems to be more personalized, accurate, scalable, and flexible in the e-commerce field [2, 3].
For those e-commerce sites, gaining customer loyalty is an essential business strategy where the performance of whole company depends on one or two clicks of customers [4]. Recommender systems improve loyalty by creating a value-added relationship between the site and the customer. E-commerce sites learn the customers’ “manual effort” (refers to the preferences customers left on the sites) and with the operation of recommendation system, presenting customers with their flavored interfaces and products. The more a customer teaches recommendation system what they want, the more loyalty is stuck to the site [1].
These days, many e-commerce sites and platforms incorporate social media function into personalization recommendation systems as well as sites and Apps. Thus online social community is not exclusive to those frequently-used social platforms. Take Taobao, the largest e-commerce company in China, for example, Tao’s Friend Moments is a function newly added, where friends can post and share products recently purchased. Even more, one’s own shopping cart can be directly shared to others. Besides the regular text and picture review towards products, you can post any questions about goods. The questions will be notified to everyone who has bought the same goods. In addition, key opinion leader (KOL) and some rapidly developed sectors of e-commerce, such as live streaming commerce, have exhibited strong social community features. Users always immerse into them just as immersing into attractive contents in some social media platform. Continuing retention in e-commerce website may have influence their loyalty to website.
Prior studies have examined that some features of e-commerce sites may have relationships with customer satisfaction purchase intention using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Other research focus on the flow state theory and Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) Model, but most of them investigate the relationship with purchase intention. Additionally, though many studies have demonstrated how personalization recommendation system and social media will impact customer behavior, there is a lack of inspection of what effect of social media function and online community embedded in the e-commerce sites will have on customer loyalty.
With all these entertainment and interactivity elements appear, personalization recommendation system is also seen as “addictive”, which is psychologically and emotionally related. Here, based on S-O-R theory, we embed flow state as mediation to represent customer experience and psychology-related variable. In this study, we address previously mentioned questions by dividing variable of personalization recommendation system into several aspects and linking them to flow state. The subdimension of personalization recommendation system includes information presentation, system interaction, and social community function. It’s more detailed to investigate exact effect that every dimension has.
II. Theoretical Background
1. Personalization recommendation
Recommending product based on user-specified preferences, a user's shopping history, or choices made by other consumers with similar profiles, personalization recommendation system have the potential to reduce consumers' information overload and search complexity [5]. The information content and the way to present information of a personalization recommendation are the key elements affecting the recommendation effect [6]. Quantities of research about antecedents of flow in information systems have been done. Information quality, system quality are regarded to have positive relationship with flow [7]. Here, we choose information presentation, system interaction and social community function as three dimensions to measure personalization recommendation level.
2. Flow state
Flow, also called as autotelic experience, is described by individuals participating in the activities of chess, rock climbing, dancing and performing surgery. It’s a kind of complete involvement in activities. When at the flow state, people forget about time pass and lose the perception of surrounding environment [8]. [9] especially define the flow experience in a computer-mediated environment as the state occurring during network navigation, which is characterized by a seamless sequence of responses facilitated by machine interactivity, intrinsically enjoyable, accompanied by a loss of self-consciousness, and self-reinforcing. The quality of website is expected to influence the level of user’s flow state. Convenience, contents, aesthetics and interactivity of sites influence flow level, and differences of effects between countries are significant [10]. Flow state has always appeared in the scenario of customer experience and loyalty. [11] view flow state as one of customer experience: cognitive experiences. Through the mediation of flow state, interactivity, customization, connectedness and visibility indirectly influence customer stickiness.
3. Word of mouth
[12] defined word of mouth (WOM) as a consumer’s likelihood to recommend and say positive things about a company to other consumers. In traditional marketing, WOM is the information one obtains through interpersonal communication with friends and family [13]. While nowadays, with massive digital marketing and explosion of online community and social media, word of mouth has expanded to activities such as liking a brand on Facebook, writing a review online, posting and sharing brands through social media. Compared to traditional WOM, WOM from internet channels covers more population and is more permanent and publicly available [14]. WOM not only shows its positive relationship with brand loyalty [14-16], but also boosts sales [17, 18]. In this study, we follow the similar logic of [11], recognizing WOM as a component of customer loyalty.
4. Repurchase intention
Loyalty can be classified into two types: behavior loyalty such as repeat purchase behavior and attitudinal loyalty such as positive feelings towards brands. [14, 19]. Repeated purchases consists brand loyalty [20]. Customer retention is of great importance to e-commerce sites [1]. And one of the obvious indicators of customer retention is repurchase intention. Here, we also set repurchase intention as measurement to customer loyalty.
III. Hypothesis Development
To further demonstrate the relationship between variables of personalization recommendation, loyalty and flow state, we built conceptual model as shown in Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Research model
1. Personalization recommendation & loyalty
In omnichannel retailing, previous studies have mentioned that from the view of social exchange theory, personalization recommendation and WOM is form of reciprocal behavior between customers and brands. Customers engaged in WOM believe they will benefit from brands [21]. Personalized services provided by brands as an exchange become a motivation of customer WOM behavior. [22] found that perceived personal preference fit have significant positive effect on both face-to-face WOM and social media WOM. With the application of personalized recommendation system, loyalty to e-commerce sites is largely enhanced through customer values, customer experiences. Personalized product recommendations of higher quality results in greater value by customers, which is positively associated with repurchase intention [23].
In the field of online retailing and business, the positive relationship between personalization recommendation and loyalty has been confirmed. [24] discovered that perceived quality of website content positively affects users’ loyalty to tourism websites. In addition, E-loyalty was always found to be positively and indirectly affected by system interaction. Perceived interactivity to webpage affects e-loyalty through enjoyment, trust, effectiveness, etc. [25], and through customer satisfaction [26]. [27] stated that online community engagement has positive affect on community loyalty mediated by collective efficacy. Social community function embedded in personalization recommendation system can be viewed as a small social media of one specific platform. Many studies have shown the importance and strong positive effect of social media engagement on loyalty either directly or indirectly [28, 29]. Based on the above discussion, the following can be hypothesized:
H1a. Information presentation has a positive direct effect on word of mouth.
H1b. System interaction has a positive direct effect on word of mouth.
H1c. Social community function has a positive direct effect on word of mouth.
H2a. Information presentation has a positive direct effect on repurchase intention.
H2b. System interaction has a positive direct effect on repurchase intention.
H2c. Social community function has a positive direct effect on repurchase intention.
2. Personalization recommendation & flow state & loyalty
Personalization recommendation positively influences people’s flow state especially in some online scenario. Personalization recommendation system creates an environment which makes people immerse in, customizes for them with their preferred content and information, provide a smooth human-computer interaction. This kind of flow experience leads to active and excited engagement with a website and increase the likelihood of return visits and e-loyalty [30]. Researchers have widely embraced and used the Stimulus-Organism-Response model (S-O-R) to analyze behavior in the context of e-commerce purchasing intention [34-36], social media engagement [37], mobile applications adoption [38-40], online hotel booking behavior [41]. To conclude, the S-O-R model signifies the relation among stimuli in the environment, emotional states of people and the behavior of approach or avoidance which arises from the collaboration of stimuli and emotion.
Here is a complete purchase decision making process based on S-O-R model: Stimulated by multiple factors, motivation is generated. Driven by such motivation, consumer make the decision to purchase goods and services, conduct purchase behavior, and make comments of both goods and manufactures. Therefore, personalization recommendation can be considered as stimulus, organism refers to individual’s psychological activity, which is flow state in our study and response is customer’s loyalty. [31] suggested that personalized design, information presentation and navigation in a website induce user’s enjoyment thus playing a critical role in user’s positive cognitive experience. [32] indicated that with usage of SNS, flow state has a direct and positive impact on purchase intention. Flow encourages repeated customer purchasing or consuming behavior [33]. Further, [30] extended flow state & e-loyalty model by adding five antecedents, including system quality, content visibility, design quality, etc. Therefore, the following hypothesis can be proposed:
H3: Personalization recommendation has a positive effect on flow state.
H4: Flow state has a positive effect on loyalty.
Ⅳ. Methodology
1. Questionnaire design & data collection
In this paper, we use the methodology of questionnaire to collect data for the following analysis. Our objective is to study personal recommendation of some online shopping sites, so questionnaire was distributed online through Credamo, a powerful and reliable survey platform used in much professional research. There are two parts in questionnaire: demographic information and measurement of variables. For measurement part, we design the questionnaire using 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” (numbered 1) to “strongly agree” (numbered 5). Measured variables include information presentation (Info), system interaction (Sys), social community function (Soc), flow state (FS), word of mouth (WOM) and repurchase intention (RPI). Questions of Info include whether the information displayed in the websites is necessary, attractive, complete and well-arranged. Questions of Sys include if website provides intuitive and immediate interaction, feedback etc. Questions of Soc include if there is how much users get involved and influenced by social media function. All the respondents were well-informed that the survey was conducted anonymously in order to avoid dishonest answers. Since the survey is collected online, we set a verification question to confirm it is human not computer that is answering the questions. And we also delete sample with answer time either less than one minute or more than three minutes. After removing 23 invalid samples, a total of 500 questionnaire was successfully organized and used in following analysis.
2. Descriptive analysis
The respondents’ profile is illustrated by descriptive analysis, shown in Table 1. We can see that percentages of male and female is quite close to 50%, meaning there is no gender bias in this survey. Noticeably, since members of Generation Z are spending more time on electronic devices [34], we cluster age based on social generation. Age 12 to 27, 28 to 43, and 44 to 59 indicate Generation Z, Generation Y and Generation X respectively.
Table 1. Descriptive analysis
3. Reliability rest, validity test & model fit
Reliability indicates the consistency of a measure. In this study, we consider internal consistency, which is the consistency of people’s responses across the items on a multiple-item measure [35]. The most common measure of internal consistency is Cronbach’s Alpha. We use SPSS 29.0 to test Cronbach’s Alpha and results are listed in the Table 2. The overall Cronbach’s Alpha is 0.883, larger than 0.7, indicating a good internal consistency across questionnaires, so is the other variables.
Table 2. Reliability test
Validity is the extent to which the scores from a measure represent the variable they are intended to. The overall validity is examined through KMO and Bartlett’s Test, which is 0.874, larger than stipulated criterion (0.8), indicating a good construct validity. In this study, we calculate Average variance Extracted (AVE) and Composite Reliability (CR) to test convergent validity. Generally, AVE larger than 0.5 and CR larger than 0.8 implies a good validity of data. In the Table 4, we can know that all the variables have reached the criteria, suggesting a good validity.
Table 3. KMO and Bartlett's test
Table 4. Validity test
Both reliability test and validity test indicate that data is qualified for analysis using structural equation model. Moreover, model fitting test should be conducted to evaluate the explanatory power of this model. Widely used indexes are shown in Table 5. All the indexes are within the range of ideal value, implying that this model has a good model fit and is acceptable.
Table 5. Model fitting
4. SEM analysis
Based on above pre-tests, We can proceed to SEM analysis using AMOS 26.0. The estimation results and path diagram are showed in Table 6 and Figure 2. Since p-values of hypothesis H1a & H2c are much larger than 0.01, these two hypotheses are not proved to be statistically significant. All the other hypotheses are statistically supported.
Table 6. SEM results
Fig. 2. Path diagram
5. Mediation effect
Bootstrapping procedures are conducted in order to test whether the indirect variable flow state mediates between personalization recommendation and loyalty. Unstandardized indirect effects were computed for each of 5000 bootstrapped samples, and the 95% confidence interval was computed by determining the indirect effects. As shown in Table, bootstrapped unstandardized indirect effects between three personalization recommendation variables and two loyalty variables are all statistically significant.
Table 7. Mediating effect/bootstrap intermediation test results
V. Conclusions
1. Results
The SEM analysis revealed significant relationships between several variables, providing insights into the impact of personalization recommendation systems on customer loyalty in e-commerce. Specifically, three subdimensions of personalization recommendation: information presentation (β=0.347, p<0.001), system interaction (β=0.243, p<0.001) and social community function (β=0.360, p<0.001) are statistically proved to have positive effect on flow state. Social community function impacts most to flow states, which is consistent with previous research. In turn, flow state has a significant positive effect on both WOM and RPI. Therefore, hypothesis based on S-O-R theory are statistically significant. In the bootstrap mediation effect procedures, flow state was proved to have mediation effect between personalization recommendation and loyalty. System interaction showed significant positive effects on both word of mouth (WOM) and repurchase intention (RPI). While information presentation only positively affect repurchase intention and social community function only have positive impact on word of mouth. Therefore, the mediation effect of flow state experience is significant between system interaction and loyalty (including both word of mouth and repurchase intention). While flow state only mediates between information presentation and repurchase intention and between social community function and word of mouth.
2. Implications
This study focuses on the personalization recommendation in e-commerce domain, selects three measurements of personalization recommendation which are important and worth noticing. We especially take social community function embedded in e-commerce platform into consideration, enhancing the understanding of personalization recommendation from psychological and customers’ point of view. Social community function is positively related to customer’s loyalty, the more social community function is applied in online shopping website, the more loyalty will be attached to the website. Generally, most of e-commerce platforms have basic social community function such as review and rate. But with the development of personalization recommendation system, complete functions of social media are almost totally embedded into e-commerce platforms, which are once originally served as pure online shopping websites. On the other hand, traditional social media platforms are also adding online shopping function into their ecology. The importance of social media or social community function has been fully revealed. Building and developing a unique social community is of great help of constructing a virtuous circle business model. Many other research have studied the importance of system interaction and information presentation from the technical view. System interaction is also a vital element when considering the customer’s experience. SEM analysis and bootstrapping mediation test have demonstrated that an inspiring and intuitive system interaction can strengthen the loyalty of customers to the website, and this process is mediated by flow state experience. Information presentation is the most obvious and direct interface communicating with customers. The quality of information presentation and display set a first impression to users. This study concluded that information presentation also plays an important role in loyalty, especially for repurchase intention.
Following are some implications for e-commerce Sites. First, e-commerce platforms should prioritize improving system interaction and integrating social community functions into their recommendation systems to foster customer loyalty. By facilitating seamless interaction and encouraging social engagement, platforms can enhance user experience and stimulate positive word of mouth, which is crucial for attracting new customers. Second, the study highlights the role of flow state as a mediator between personalization recommendation and customer loyalty. e-commerce platforms should aim to create an immersive and enjoyable experience for users, ensuring they feel deeply engaged with the platform. This can be achieved through personalized content, smooth navigation, and interactive features, ultimately leading to higher repurchase intention and positive word of mouth.
3. Limitation and future study
The methodology in this study is based on questionnaire collected online, so dynamic changes of variables can not be fully captured. And this study focuses on specific platforms popular in China, though these platforms show some similar features among e-commerce around the world, it has limitations ignoring some specific situations. Future research could explore additional factors that influence flow state and its relationship with customer loyalty. Investigating the role of demographic variables, such as age and gender, in moderating these relationships could provide deeper insights. Additionally, longitudinal studies could track customer behavior over time to understand how loyalty evolves in response to changes in personalization recommendation strategies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by Kyonggi University's Graduate Research Assistantship 2023.
References
- J. B. Schafer, J. Konstan and J. Riedl. (1999 of Conference). Recommender systems in e-commerce. In Series Series Recommender systems in e-commerce [Source]. Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce, Denver Colorado USA.
- S. Shafiee, "Unveiling the Latest Trends and Advancements in Machine Learning Algorithms for Recommender Systems: A Literature Review," Procedia CIRP, Vol. 121, No. pp.115-120, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.08.062
- K. C. Bodduluri, F. Palma, A. Kurti, I. Jusufi and H. Lowenadler, "Exploring the Landscape of Hybrid Recommendation Systems in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review," IEEE Access, Vol. 12, No. pp.28273-28296, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365828
- F. F. Reichheld, "Loyalty-based management," Harvard business review, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp.64-73, 1993.
- B. Xiao and I. Benbasat, "E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp.137-209, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148784
- F. Li, X. Liu and S. Wang, "Information Presentation of Personalized Recommendations, Psychological Distance and Consumers' Willingness to Accept: A Perspective from Construal Level Theory," Enterprise Economy, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp.109-115, 2018.
- B. Kim, M. Yoo and W. Yang, "Online engagement among restaurant customers: The importance of enhancing flow for social media users," Journal of hospitality & tourism research, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp.252-277, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019887202
- M. Csikszentmihalyi, "Beyond boredom and anxiety", Jossey-bass, 2000.
- D. L. Hoffman and T. P. Novak, "Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations," Journal of marketing, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp.50-68, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304
- Q. Fan, J. Yul Lee and J. In Kim, "The impact of web site quality on flow-related online shopping behaviors in C2C e-marketplaces: A cross-national study," Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp.364-387, 2013.
- O. Tyrvainen, H. Karjaluoto and H. Saarijarvi, "Personalization and hedonic motivation in creating customer experiences and loyalty in omnichannel retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 57, No. pp.102233, 2020.
- V. A. Zeithaml, L. L. Berry and A. Parasuraman, "The behavioral consequences of service quality," Journal of marketing, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp.31-46, 1996.
- D. K. Gauri, A. Bhatnagar and R. Rao, "Role of word of mouth in online store loyalty," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp.89-91, 2008.
- J. Eelen, P. Ozturan and P. W. Verlegh, "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International journal of research in marketing, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp.872-891, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.08.002
- S.-H. Liao, Y.-C. Chung, Y.-R. Hung and R. Widowati. (2010). The impacts of brand trust, customer satisfaction, and brand loyalty on word-of-mouth. 2010 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management,
- S. Maisam and R.-d. Mahsa, "Positive word of mouth marketing: Explaining the roles of value congruity and brand love," Journal of competitiveness, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.19-37, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.01.02
- A. Davis and D. Khazanchi, "An empirical study of online word of mouth as a predictor for multi-product category e-commerce sales," Electronic markets, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.130-141, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780802044776
- A. Babic Rosario, F. Sotgiu, K. De Valck and T. H. Bijmolt, "The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors," Journal of marketing research, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp.297-318, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0380
- A. S. Dick and K. Basu, "Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework," Journal of the academy of marketing science, Vol. 22, No. pp.99-113, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222001
- U. H. Funke and G. S. Day, "A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty," Mathematical models in marketing: a collection of abstracts, Vol. No. pp.89-89, 1976.
- Z. W. Lee, T. K. Chan, A. Y.-L. Chong and D. R. Thadani, "Customer engagement through omnichannel retailing: The effects of channel integration quality," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 77, No. pp.90-101, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.004
- Y. Li, R. Tan and X. Gong, "How omnichannel integration promotes customer word-of-mouth behaviors: the mediating roles of perceived personal preference fit and perceived social relatedness," Information Technology & People, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.1726-1753, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2021-0440
- Z. Tongxiao, R. Agarwal and H. C. Lucas, "The Value of It-Enabled Retailer Learning: Personalized Product Recommendations and Customer Store Loyalty in Electronic Markets," MIS quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.859-881, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409964
- J. A. Martinez-Gonzalez and C. D. Alvarez-Albelo, "Influence of site personalization and first impression on young consumers' loyalty to tourism websites," Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.1425, 2021.
- D. Cyr, M. Head and A. Ivanov, "Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses," International Journal of Human-computer studies, Vol. 67, No. 10, pp.850-869, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.004
- H. H. Chang and S. W. Chen, "The impact of customer interface quality, satisfaction and switching costs on e-loyalty: Internet experience as a moderator," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.2927-2944, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.014
- J. Han, M. Jun and M. Kim, "Impact of online community engagement on community loyalty and social well-being," Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.1-8, 2019.
- M. Laroche, M. R. Habibi and M.-O. Richard, "To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media?," International journal of information management, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp.76-82, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003
- M. Yadav and Z. Rahman, "The influence of social media marketing activities on customer loyalty: A study of e-commerce industry," Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp.3882-3905, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2017-0092
- J. Ilsever, D. Cyr and M. Parent, "Extending models of flow and e-loyalty," Journal of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.3-22, 2007.
- D. Desai. (2019). An empirical study of website personalization effect on users intention to revisit E-commerce website through cognitive and hedonic experience. Data Management, Analytics and Innovation: Proceedings of ICDMAI 2018, Volume 2,
- H. Hyun, T. Thavisay and S. H. Lee, "Enhancing the role of flow experience in social media usage and its impact on shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 65, No. pp.102492, 2022.
- C.-I. Teng, L.-S. Huang, S.-P. Jeng, Y.-J. Chou and H.-H. Hu, "Who may be loyal? Personality, flow experience and customer e-loyalty," International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.20-47, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECRM.2012.046468
- J. Lin, T. Li and J. Guo, "Factors influencing consumers' continuous purchase intention on fresh food e-commerce platforms: An organic foods-centric empirical investigation," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 50, No. pp.101103, 2021.
- H. Tian and Y. Lee, "Factors affecting continuous purchase intention of fashion products on social E-commerce: SOR model and the mediating effect," Entertainment computing, Vol. 41, No. pp.100474, 2022.
- L. Zhu, H. Li, F.-K. Wang, W. He and Z. Tian, "How online reviews affect purchase intention: a new model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework," Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp.463-488, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0308
- J. U. Islam and Z. Rahman, "The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm," Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp.96-109, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.004
- P. K. Chopdar and J. Balakrishnan, "Consumers response towards mobile commerce applications: SOR approach," International journal of information management, Vol. 53, No. pp.102106, 2020.
- J.-C. Lee and X. Chen, "Exploring users' adoption intentions in the evolution of artificial intelligence mobile banking applications: the intelligent and anthropomorphic perspectives," International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.631-658, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0394
- T. Huang, "Using SOR framework to explore the driving factors of older adults smartphone use behavior," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.690, 2023.
- A. Emir, H. Halim, A. Hedre, D. Abdullah, A. Azmi and S. B. M. Kamal, "Factors influencing online hotel booking intention: A conceptual framework from stimulus-organism-response perspective," International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.129-134, 2016.
- J. M. Twenge, "Teens today spend more time on digital media, less time reading," American Psychological Association, Vol. No. 2018.
- P. C. Price, R. Jhangiani and I.-C. A. Chiang, "Research methods in psychology", BCCampus, 2015.