DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

"Cohesiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers": Evaluation Using Multiple Cohesion Tests

  • Kyun Tae Kim (Yonsei Dain Plastic Surgery Clinic) ;
  • Won Lee (Scientific Faculty of the Minimal Invasive Plastic Surgery Association) ;
  • Eun-Jung Yang (Scientific Faculty of the Minimal Invasive Plastic Surgery Association)
  • 투고 : 2023.06.03
  • 심사 : 2023.11.24
  • 발행 : 2024.01.15

초록

Background Hyaluronic acid fillers can be manufactured using various processes. They have multiple properties, including their concentration, degree of modification, and rheological data. Cohesion is one such property to evaluate gel integrity; however, there is no standardized method for calculating this parameter. This study aimed to evaluate different tests for calculating hyaluronic acid cohesion and discuss the importance of hyaluronic acid cohesion as a consideration when selecting fillers. Methods The cohesion levels of five different hyaluronic acid fillers with different rheological properties were evaluated and compared using the drop weight, compression, tack, and dispersion time tests. Results The cohesion tests yielded different results in the samples. Samples 2 and 4 showed approximately two times the number of droplets when compared with Sample 5 in drop weight test. Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were superior to Sample 5 in tack test. Samples 1, 2, and 3 showed cohesive appearances at 95 seconds in most cases in dispersion test. Rheological test results did not reflect the measures of cohesion. Conclusion Although there are no definite standardized tests to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers, our proposed tests showed similar results for different hyaluronic acid filler products. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers and determine the clinical use of this distinguishing characteristic for clinicians selecting the product of choice. Level of evidence statement: These data are Level IV evidence.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pierre S, Liew S, Bernardin A. Basics of dermal filler rheology. Dermatol Surg 2015;41(Suppl 1):S120-S126 https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000334
  2. Sundaram H, Cassuto D. Biophysical characteristics of hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers and their relevance to aesthetic applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(04, Suppl 2):5S-21S https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829d1d40
  3. Hee CK, Shumate GT, Narurkar V, Bernardin A, Messina DJ. Rheological properties and in vivo performance characteristics of soft tissue fillers. Dermatol Surg 2015;41(Suppl 1):S373-S381 https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000536
  4. Fagien S, Bertucci V, von Grote E, Mashburn JH. Rheologic and physicochemical properties used to differentiateinjectablehyaluronic acid filler products. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143(04):707e-720e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005429
  5. Borrell M, Leslie DB, Tezel A. Lift capabilities of hyaluronic acid fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2011;13(01):21-27 https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.552609
  6. Sundaram H, Rohrich RJ, Liew S, et al. Cohesivity of hyaluronic acid fillers: development and clinical implications of a novel assay, pilot validation with a five-point grading scale, and evaluation of Six U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136(04):678-686 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001638
  7. Edsman KLM, Ohrlund A Cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers: correlation between cohesion and other physicochemical properties. Dermatol Surg 2018;44(04):557-562  https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001370