Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2021S1A5C2A01090085).
References
- 고재남. (2020). 중앙아시아의 장기집권 권위주의 정치. 아시아지역리뷰 제3권제3호.
- 김시헌&장세호. (2023). 선거제도 개편을 통한 러시아 정치 엘리트의 지배력 유지 전략. 분석과 대안 제7권제1호.
- 방일권. (2010). 카자흐스탄 엘리트의 사회배경과 씨족 정치: 소주즈(Zhiz) 출신 엘리트를 중심으로. 국제지역연구 제14권제1호.
- 엄구호. (2009). 중앙아시아의 민주주의와 씨족 정치. 세계지역연구논총 제27집3호.
- 윤도원. (2020). 2019년 카자흐스탄 권력승계 연구: 권력복점의 제도화를 중심으로. 아시아리뷰 제10권제1호.
- 이재영, 고재남, 박상남&이지은. (2009). 카자흐스탄 정치 엘리트와 권력구조연구. 서울: 대외경제정책연구원.
- 정재원. (2018). 카자흐스탄 자본가계급의 출현. 역사비평 통권125호.
- 한신대학교 유라시아연구소. (2023). 카자흐스탄. Elite DB. http://www.hei.re.kr/HANSHIN/library/db/KZ(검색일: 2023.12.01.).
- 황영삼. (2010). 카자흐스탄 재계 현황과 재계 엘리트의 특징: 정치권력과 관련성을 중심으로. 아태연구 제17권제1호.
- Best, Heinrich & Vogel, Lars. (2018). "Representative Elites." in Best, Heinrich and Higley, John(eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Carey, John M. & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14(4).
- Chang, Eric C. C. & Higashijima, Masaaki. (2023). The Choice of Electoral Systems in Electoral Autocracies. Government and Opposition 58(1).
- Gandhi, Jennifer & Lust-Okar, Ellen. (2009). Elections under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12.
- Gandhi, Jennifer & Przeworski, Adam. (2006). COOPERATION, COOPTATION, AND REBELLION UNDER DICTATORSHIPS. Economics & Politics 18.
- Hicken, Allen. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science 14(1).
- Isaacs, Rico & Whitmore, Sarah. (2014). The limited agency and life-cycles of personalized dominant parties in the post-Soviet space: the cases of United Russia and Nur Otan. Democratization 21(4).
- Isaacs, Rico. (2008). The parliamentary election in Kazakhstan, August 2007. Electoral Studies 27(2).
- Isaacs, Rico. (2013). Nur Otan, Informal Networks and the Countering of Elite Instability in Kazakhstan: Bringing the 'Formal' Back In. Europe-Asia Studies 65(6).
- Isaacs, Rico. (2020). The Role of Party Interest Articulation in the Personalist-Authoritarian Regimes of the Central Asian Republics of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. Problems of Post-Communism 67(4-5).
- Junisbai, Barbara. (2010). A Tale of Two Kazakhstans: Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period. Europe-Asia Studies 62(2).
- Krol, Gerrit. (2021). Amending legislatures in authoritarian regimes: power sharing in post-Soviet Eurasia. Democratization 28(3).
- Kryshtanovskaya, Olga & White, Stephen. (1996). From Soviet Nomenklatura to Russian Elite. Europe-Asia Studies 48(5).
- Murphy, Jonathan. (2006). Illusory Transition? Elite Reconstitution in Kazakhstan, 1989-2002. Europe-Asia Studies 58(4).
- Peyrouse, Sebastien. (2012). THE KAZAKH NEOPATRIMONIAL REGIME: BALANCING UNCERTAINTIES AMONG THE "FAMILY," OLIGARCHS AND TECHNOCRATS. Demokratizatsiya 20(4).
- Schatz, Edward. (2005). Reconceptualizing clans: Kinship networks and statehood in kazakhstan. Nationalities Papers 33(2).
- Somfalvy, Esther. (2021). The Challenges to De-localising Constituencies through Electoral Reform in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Europe-Asia Studies 73(3).
- Zhanarstanova, Maral & Kanapyanov, Timur. (2011). Development of post-communist parliamentarism in Kazakhstan and Romania: a comparative analysis. Cinq Continents 1(3).
- МАЖИЛИСА ПАРЛАМЕНТА РЕСПУБЛИКИ КАЗАХС ТАН. (2023). СПИСОК ВСЕХ ДЕПУТАТОВ МАЖИЛ ИСА. О МАЖИЛИСЕ. https://parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis(검색일: 2023.12.05.).