Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics Analysis of Accident Factors of UK Civil Unmanned Aircraft Using SHELL Model and HFACS

SHELL 모델과 HFACS를 활용한 영국 민간 무인 항공기 사고 요인 특징 분석

  • 김도윤 (한국항공대학교 일반대학원 항공운항관리학과) ;
  • 장조원 (한국항공대학교 항공운항학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.04
  • Accepted : 2024.02.22
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The unmanned aerial vehicle industry has developed a lot, but the possibility of accidents is increasing due to potential risks. In this study, SHELL models and HFACS were used to analyze unmanned aerial vehicle accidents in the UK and to identify the main causes and characteristics of accidents. The main cause analyzed by the SHELL model was identified as an abnormality in the alarm system. The main cause of the accident analyzed by HFACS was identified as the technical environment. The common cause identified by the SHELL model and HFACS was identified as a mechanical problem of unmanned aerial vehicles. This is due to the lack of accurate information or functionality of the alarm system in the operator interface, which often prevents the operator from responding to sensitive information. Therefore, in order to prevent civil UAV accidents, the stability and reliability of the system must be secured through regular inspections of the UAV system and continuous software updates. In addition, an ergonomic approach considering human interfaces is needed when developing technologies.

Keywords

References

  1. Koo, B. E., "Human error vulnerability as a pilot in a military unmanned aerial vehicle system," Korean Academy of Aerospace Human Factors, Korea Airports Corporation Aviation Security Training Center, 2018, pp.1-26.
  2. Kim, C. Y., "Aviation human factors and maintenance safety", Node Media, 2016, pp.362-375.
  3. Kim, D. Y., "Analysis of factors contributing to UK civil unmanned aircraft accidents using SHELL model and HFACS", Korea Aerospace University, 2023.
  4. ICAO, Safety Management Manual(SMM) - Third Edition, 2012.
  5. Kim, J. W., and Shim, S. R., "A case study on the evolutionary development of U.S unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs)", Journal of Advances in Military Studies, 3(2), 2020, pp.17-46. https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v3i2.69
  6. Lee, K. H., "A study on the application of HFACS to investigate accidents of domestic civil unmanned aerial vehicles in Korea", Korea Aerospace University, 2022.
  7. "Technology trend brief: Unmanned aerial vehicle", KISTEP, 3(3), 2020.
  8. Lee, K. H., "Applicable focal points of HFACS to investigate domestic civil unmanned aerial vehicle Accidents" J. Adv. Navig. Technol. 25(3), 2021, pp.261-265.
  9. Oncu, M., and Yildiz, S., "An analysis of human causal factors in unmanned aerial  vehicle (UAV) accidents", Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, December 2014.
  10. Reason, J., "Human error", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.
  11. Yoo, T. J., "A study on the human error analysis tool and prevention for helicopter accident in Korea", Korea Aerospace University, 2020, pp.9-35.
  12. Tvaryanas, A. P., Thompson, W. T., and Constable, S. H., "Human factors in remotely piloted aircraft operations: HFACS analysis of 221 mishaps over 10 years", Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77(7), 2006, pp.724-732.
  13. U.S. Air Force Safety Center, "DoD human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) version 7.0", 2019, pp.1-23.
  14. Wiegman, D., Shappell, S., "The human factors analysis an classification system (HFACS)", FAA, 2000, pp.1-2.
  15. Choi, Y. C., Choi, Y. K., and Kim, C. Y., "A study on the detailed classification and empirical analysis of human error", The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 10(1), 2002.