Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022S1A5A2A01038760)
References
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. l. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.
- Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Acher, A., Arca, M., & Sanmarti, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91(3), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20196
- Akerson, V. L., Townsend, J. S., Donnelly, L. A., Hanson, D. L., Tira, P., & White, O. (2009). Scientific modeling for inquiring teachers network (SMIT'N): The influence on elementary teachers' views of nature of science, inquiry, and modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9116-5
- Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2018). Capturing and representing the complexity of PCK in action. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' professional knowledge. New York: Springer.
- Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers' PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science, 273-288.
- Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49, 1141-1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z
- Campbell, T., Oh, P. S., & Neilson, D. (2013). Reification of five types of modeling pedagogies with model-based inquiry (MBI) modules for high school science cla ssrooms. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Sa leh (Eds.), Approaches and strategies in next generation science learning (pp. 106-126). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A., ... & Wilson, C. D. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science, 77-94.
- Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge is investigated in empirical studies. Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science, 3-76.
- Cho, E., Kim, C., & Choe, S. (2017). An investigation into the secondary science teachers' perception on scientific models and modeling. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 859-877.
- Cho, H., & Nam, J. (2017). Analysis of trends of model and modeling-related research in science education in korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 539-552.
- Cho, H., Nam, J., & Oh, P. (2017). A review of model and modeling in science education: Focus on the metamodeling knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 239-252.
- Clement, J. J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover & R. Ronning, C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
- Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: analysing teachers' knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8
- Deng, Z. (2007). Transforming the subject matter: examining the intellectual roots of pedagogical content knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00386.x
- Dogan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2015). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers' knowledge, practice and student learning: A review. Professional Development in Education.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Fulmer, G. W., & Liang, L. L. (2013). Measuring model-based high school science instruction: Development and application of a student survey. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9374-z
- Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). New York: Routledge.
- Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses?. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200106
- Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16(7-8), 653-697.
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84(3), 352-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J
- Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1321-1342.
- Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes-a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341-355.
- Ingham, A. I., & Gilbert, J. K. (1991). The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130207
- Jeong, E., Kwak, Y., & Lee, K. (2023). A case study of school-level professional learning community using protocol for science inquiry class. The Korean Society of Biology Education, 51(2), 220-235.
- Johnson, S. K., & Stewart, J. (2002). Revising and assessing explanatory models in a high school genetics class: A comparison of unsuccessful and successful performance. Science Education, 86(4), 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10015
- Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
- Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. (2005). A case study of the development of a beginning chemistry teacher's knowledge about models and modelling. Research in Science Education, 35(2-3), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-7583-z
- Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20226
- Kim, H., Lim, C., & Lee, K. (2023). Composition and attributes of modeling instructions and factors of teacher competence in elementary science classes: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 42(3), 434-454.
- Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in science education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
- Kind, V. (2017). Development of evidence-based, student-learning-oriented rubrics for pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 1-33.
- Koponen, I. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: a critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science and Education, 16(7-8), 751-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9000-7
- Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 716-725.
- Kwak, Y. (2022). Teacher and qualitative research: Episteme and Phronesis. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa
- Lee, K., Jeong, E., & Kwak, Y. (2022). Exploring the applicability of PLC protocol for enhancing science teachers' teaching expertise on inquiry class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(4), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2022.42.4.439
- Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
- Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.
- Loughran, J., Gunstone, R., Berry, A., Milroy, P., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Reserch in Science Education, 31(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013124409567
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
- Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
- Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015). Science curriculum. notification No. 2015-74. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education(MOE). (2022). Science curriculum. notification No. 2022-33. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
- Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20073
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nelson, M. M., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers' evaluations of elementary students' scientific models: an aspect of pedagogical content knowledge for scientific modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1931-1959.
- NGSS Lead States (Ed.). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699-721.
- Oh, P. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers' perceptions on models used in science and science education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 450-466.
- Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941.
- Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008a). National Board Certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers' learning about teaching: The effects of the NBC process on candidate teachers' PCK development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 812-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20234
- Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008b). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
- Park, Y., Kim, M., & Chang, J. (2018). A study on the development and applicability of the curriculum literacy protocol for the professional learning community. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(5), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.5.31
- Rosenkranzer, F., Horsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2017). Student teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching systems thinking: Effects of different interventions. International Journal of Science Education, 1-20.
- Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20408
- Schwarz, C. V. (2002). Is there a connection? The role of meta-modeling knowledge in learning with models. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
- Schwarz, C., & Gwekwerere, T. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework to support preservise K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20177
- Settlage, J. (2013). On acknowledging PCK's shortcomings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9332-x
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Stylianidou, F., Boohan, R., & Ogborn, J. (2005). Science teachers' transformations of the use of computer modeling in the classroom: Using research to inform training. Science Education, 89(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20043
- Suk, Y., & Yoon, H. (2022). Analysis of elementary students modeling using the globe on the cause of seasonal change. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(4), 673-689.
- Uhm, J., & Kim, H. (2020). Changes in teaching practices of elementary school teachers in scientific modeling classes: Focused on modeling pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 543-563.
- Van Driel, J. H. (2014). Professional learning of science teachers. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 139-156). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Windschitl M., Thompson J., & Braaten M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-Based Inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
- Yoon, H. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers' inquiry on a model of magnetism and changes in their views of scientific models. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 353-366.
- Yu, H., Ham, D., Cha, H., Kim, M., Kim, H., Yoo, J., Park, H., Kim, C., & Choe, S. (2012). Model creation and model developing process of science gifted students in scientific model constructing class for phase change of the moon. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(2), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.291