한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-54
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자연기반해법의 탄소저장과 생물다양성의 공동·상쇄 효과 평가

Assessment of Co-benefit and Trade-off Effects of Nature-based Solutions on Carbon Storage Capacity and Biodiversity

  • 김다슬 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학연구원) ;
  • 이동근 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 ) ;
  • 황혜미 (서울대학교 생태조경.지역시스템공학부 ) ;
  • 허수정 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 윤석환 (일본 국립환경연구소) ;
  • 김은섭 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정 조경학)
  • Kim, Da-seul (Researh Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-kun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Heymee (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Su-jeong (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yun, Seok-hwan (National Institute for Environmental Studies) ;
  • Kim, Eun-sub (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.15
  • 심사 : 2024.01.07
  • 발행 : 2024.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study developed a model to evaluate the co-benefits and trade-off effects between biodiversity and carbon storage capacity based on the implementation locations of nature-based solutions. The model aims to propose optimal implementation locations by using the conceptual idea of edge effects for carbon storage and connectivity for biodiversity. The co-benefits were considered by simultaneously taking into account two effects rather than a single effect. Trade-off effects were observed among optimal plans through a comparison of benefits. The NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm was utilized, confirming the identification of Pareto-optimal solutions. The implementation patterns of Pareto-optimal solutions for green areas were examined. This study holds significance in proposing optimal locations by evaluating various co-benefits and trade-off effects of nature-based solutions. By advancing models based on this evaluation framework, it is anticipated that the assessment of co-benefits and trade-off effects among various benefits of nature-based solutions, such as climate change mitigation, enhancement of biodiversity, and provision of ecosystem services, can be accomplished.

키워드

과제정보

본 성과는 환경부의 재원을 지원받아 한국환경산업기술원 "신기후체제 대응 환경기술개발사업"의 연구개발을 통해 창출되었습니다(2022003570004).

참고문헌

  1. Allen, C. D..A. K. Macalady.H. Chenchouni.D. Bachelet.N. McDowell.M. Vennetier.T. Kitzberger.A. Rigling.D. D. Breshears.E. H. (Ted) Hogg.P. Gonzalez.R. Fensham.Z. Zhang.J. Castro.N. Demidova.J. H. Lim.G. Allard.S. W. Running.A. Semerci and N. Cobb. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 259(4) : 660-684.
  2. Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, S. Maginnis, and C. Janzen. 2016. Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges.
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity. 2022. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework CBD/COP/15/L25.14 https://www.cbd.int/conferences/2021-2022/cop-15/documents
  4. Chen, W., Carsjens, G. J., Zhao, L., & Li, H. 2015. A Spatial Optimization Model for Sustainable Land Use at Regional Level in China: A Case Study for Poyang Lake Region. Sustainability. 7(1) : 35-55.
  5. Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6:182-197.
  6. Debele, S. E., Leo, L. S., Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Ommer, J., Bucchignani, E., Vranic, S., Kalas, M., Amirzada, Z., Pavlova, I., Shah, M. A. R., Gonzalez-Ollauri, A., & Di Sabatino, S. 2023. Nature-based solutions can help reduce the impact of natural hazards: A global analysis of NBS case studies. Science of the Total Environment, 902 : 165824.
  7. Deely, J., Hynes, S., Barquin, J., Burgess, D., Finney, G., Silio, A., Alvarez-Martinez, J. M., Bailly, D., & Balle-Beganton, J. 2020. Barrier identification framework for the implementation of blue and green infrastructures. Land Use Policy, 99 : 105108.
  8. Dobrowski, S. Z., Littlefield, C. E., Lyons, D. S., Hollenberg, C., Carroll, C., Parks, S. A., Gage, J. 2021. Protected-area targets could be undermined by climate change-driven shifts in ecoregions and biomes. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(1), 198. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00270-z
  9. Eggermont, H., E. Balian, M. Azevedo, V. Beumer, T. Brodin, J. Claudet, B. Fady, M. Grube, H. Keune, P. Lamarque, K. Reuter, M. Smith, C. Ham, W. Weisser, and X. Roux. 2015. Nature-based Solutions: New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe. Gaia: Okologische Perspektiven in Natur-, Geistes- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften 24:243-248.
  10. Folkard-Tapp, H., Banks-Leite, C., & Cavan, E. L. 2021. Nature-based Solutions to tackle climate change and restore biodiversity. In Journal of Applied Ecology. 58 : 2344-2348.
  11. Johnson, B. A., Kumar, P., Okano, N., Dasgupta, R., & Shivakoti, B. R. 2022. Nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Nature-Based Solutions, 2 : 100042.
  12. Kim, E., Song, W., & Lee, D. 2012. Forest Fragmentation and its impacts: A review. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(2):149-162. (in Korean)
  13. Li, J., Huo, H., Guo, R., Liu, B., Li, L., Dan, W., Xiao, X., Zhang, J., & Shi, B. 2017. Facile and efficient access to Androsten-17-(1',3',4')-pyrazoles and Androst-17β-(1',3',4')-pyrazoles via Vilsmeier reagents, and their antiproliferative activity evaluation in vitro. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 130 : 1-14.
  14. McGuire, J. L., Lawler, J. J., McRae, B. H., Nunez, T. A., & Theobald, D. M. 2016. Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(26), 7195-7200. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.1602817113
  15. Paudel, S., & States, S. L. 2023. Urban green spaces and sustainability: Exploring the ecosystem services and disservices of grassy lawns versus floral meadows. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 84 : 127932.
  16. Portner, H. O., Scholes, R. J., Agard, J., Archer, E., Arneth, A., Bai, X., Barnes, D., Burrows, M., Chan, L., Cheung, W. L., Diamond, S., Donatti, C., Duarte, C., Eisenhauer, N., Foden, W., Gasalla, M. A., Handa, C., Hickler, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Ngo, H. T. 2021. IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change. IPBES and IPCC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4782538
  17. Ryfisch, S., Seeger, I., McDonald, H., Lago, M., & Blicharska, M. 2023. Opportunities and limitations for Nature-Based Solutions in EU policies - Assessed with a focus on ponds and pondscapes. Land Use Policy, 135 : 106957.
  18. Sung, S., D. K. Lee, and Y. Mo. 2015. Comparison of Carbon Stock Between Forest Edge and Core by Using Connectivity Analysis. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 21:27-33. (in Korean)
  19. UNFCCC. 2016. Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties.
  20. Yang, A. S., Juan, Y. H., Wen, C. Y., & Chang, C. J. 2017. Numerical simulation of cooling effect of vegetation enhancement in a subtropical urban park. Applied Energy, 192 : 178-200.
  21. Yoon, E. J., Kim, B., & Lee, D. K. 2019. Multi-objective planning model for urban greening based on optimization algorithms. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40 : 183-194.
  22. Zhang, Y., Murray, A. T., & Turner, B. L. 2017. Optimizing green space locations to reduce daytime and nighttime urban heat island effects in Phoenix, Arizona. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165 : 162-171.