환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

물류시설의 환경영향 및 친환경적 개발 방안

Environmental Impact and Eco-Friendly Development of Logistics Facilities

  • 투고 : 2023.11.29
  • 심사 : 2024.02.01
  • 발행 : 2024.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 전자상거래의 활성화와 더불어 코로나19 팬데믹으로 인한 생활물류 서비스 수요가 증가함에 따라 소규모 물류시설의 개발이 급증하고 있다. 물류시설은 거대 배후도시를 가지며 교통이 편리한 경기도 내 특정 지역들을 중심으로 밀집되어 급속하게 증가하는 양상을 보이고 있다. 본 연구는 경기도의 안성시와 여주시, 이천시의 3개 지자체에서 개발된 총 259개의 물류시설을 조사하여 개발규모와 개발방식, 용적률, 용도지역 등의 개발 특성을 분석하였다. 특정지역에 밀집되어 개발되는 물류시설은 비도시지역에서 난개발 형태로 이루어지고 있으며, 국토환경의 훼손과 사회적 갈등을 야기하고 있다. 본 연구는 물류시설 개발로 야기되는 난개발과 환경영향, 주민과의 갈등 등의 문제점을 해결할 수 있는 제도적 개선방안과 친환경적 개발을 위한 평가 가이드라인을 제안하였다.

Recently, as e-commerce has been activated and the demand for daily logistics services has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of small logistics facilities has increased rapidly. Logistics facilities are concentrated in certain areas in Gyeonggi-do, where transportation is convenient, with large hinterland cities, showing a rapid increase. This study analyzed development characteristics such as development scale, development method, floor area ratio, and use area for a total of 259 logistics facilities developed in three local governments: Anseong, Yeoju, and Icheon. Logistics facilities developed in a specific area are developed in the form of undeveloped development in non-urban areas, causing damage to the national land environment and social conflict. This study proposed institutional improvement measures and evaluation guidelines for eco-friendly development that can solve problems such as indiscriminate development, environmental impact, and conflicts with residents caused by logistics facility development.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 한국환경연구원의 2022년도 수시과제 「도시물류시설의 수요 및 환경 입지 적정성 평가 방안(2022-16)」의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. ADLogis. 2022. Anseong Wongok Sanha 6 District Urban Management Plan (district-unit planning zones) SEA report. pp. 155-415. [Korean Literature]
  2. Anseong IlJuk Development. 2015. Anseong Iljuk Neungguk District-unit Planning SEA report. pp. 164-189. [Korean Literature]
  3. Anseong-si. 2015. 2030 Anseong Urban Master Plan, p. 126. [Korean Literature]
  4. Gyeonggi-do Losistics and Ports Division. 2022. Actual demand verification status for logistics complexes in 2020-2022 in Gyeonggi-do. [Korean Literature]
  5. Joo Y-J, Sagong H, Lee SY, Lee H-S, Kang W-J. 2022. A Study on Assessing the Site Selection of Urban Logistics Facilities Focusing on Demand and Environmental Factors, Korea Environment Institute, pp. 12-13. [Korean Literature]
  6. Kim ES, Lee MH. 2021. A Study on the Current Status and Demand Forecast of Logistics Facilities in Incheon, The Incheon Institute, pp. 53-62. [Korean Literature]
  7. Korean Law Information Center, Regulation of Permission for Development Activities; [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  8. Korean Law Information Center, National Ladn Planning and Utilization ACT; [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  9. Ministry of Environment. 2022. Regulations on the preparation, etc. of environmental impact assessment, etc, p. 35. [Korean Literature]
  10. Ministry of Environment. 2023. Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment Manual, p. 43. [Korean Literature]
  11. National Logistics Information Center, Performance of living logistics by year, [cited 2023 Nomember 25]. Available from: http://www.nlic.go.kr [Korean Literature]
  12. NewOK Development. 2022. Anseong Dukyo Secondly District Urban Management Plan(district-unit planning zones) SEA report. p. 35, p. 556. [Korean Literature]