DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Loss and efficiency comparisons of single-phase full-bridge inverters according to switch structures

  • So‑Jeong Kong (Department of Electrical Engineering, Myongji University) ;
  • Young‑Joo Kim (Logistics System Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Jin‑Su Kim (Department of Electrical Engineering, Myongji University) ;
  • Jae‑Hyuck Choi (Department of Electrical Engineering, Myongji University) ;
  • Jun‑Young Lee (Department of Electrical Engineering, Myongji University)
  • Received : 2023.05.23
  • Accepted : 2023.10.23
  • Published : 2024.02.20

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the performances of the single-phase full-bridge inverter according to different switch structures and to propose a cost-effective structure that depends on the operating area of the inverter. The five switch structures considered are: (1) insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) type, (2) resonance type based on IGBTs, (3) SiC FET type, (4) Si FET type, and 5) hybrid type, using both Si FET and IGBTs. According to each switch structure, the consistency of the analytical formula is verified by theoretical loss analyses, prototype experiments, and comparative analyses. Additionally, by comparing the prices and efficiencies of each structure, a suitable structure can be selected depending on the operating area. For the performance comparisons, 3 kW inverters with direct current (DC) input voltages of 400 V and 700 V and an output voltage of 220 Vac/60 Hz are implemented and tested at switching frequencies of 20 kHz and 40 kHz.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) (Grant 20010938) and a grant (RS-2021-KA162618) from the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement, Korea.

References

  1. Seok, O.: Power semiconductor technology trends for electric vehicles. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng. 71(12), 9-15 (2022)
  2. Al-bayati, A.M.S., Alharbi, S.S., Alharbi, S.S., Matin, M.: A comparative design and performance study of a non-isolated DC-DC buck converter based on Si-MOSFET/Si-Diode, SiCJFET/SiC-schottky diode, and GaN-transistor/SiC-Schottky diode power devices. N. Am. Power Symp. (NAPS) 2017, 1-6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107192
  3. Sang-Min, K., Tae-Suk, K.: Automotive power semiconductor application trend. KIPE Mag. 24(2), 49-53 (2019)
  4. Husain, I., et al.: Electric drive technology trends, challenges, and opportunities for future electric vehicles. Proc. IEEE 109(6), 1039-1059 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.3046112
  5. Jinrong, Q., Khan, A., Batarseh, I.: Turn-off switching loss model and analysis of IGBT under different switching operation modes. Proc. IECON Ann. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electr. 1, 240-245 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1995.483365
  6. Dey, R., Nath, S.: Replacing silicon IGBTs with SiC IGBTs in medium voltage wind energy conversion systems. India Int. Conf. Power Electr. (IICPE) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IICPE.2016.8079408
  7. De Doncker, R.W., Lyons, J.P.: The auxiliary resonant commutated pole converter. Conf. Record IEEE Ind. Appl. Soc. Ann. Meet. 2, 1228-1235 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1990.152341
  8. Zhou, W., Yuan, X., Laird, I.: Performance comparison of the auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter (ARCPI) using SiC MOSFETs or Si IGBTs. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. Expos. (ECCE) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2019.8912876
  9. Zhou, W., Yuan, X.: Experimental evaluation of SiC mosfets in comparison to Si IGBTs in a soft-switching converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 56(5), 5108-5118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2020.2999440
  10. Lee, Y.-S., Kim, J.-H., Han, B.-M., Lee, J.-Y.: Auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter with clamping diodes for voltage stress reduction across auxiliary switches. TENCON IEEE Region Ten Conf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2018.8650408
  11. Song, X., Huang, A.Q., Lee, M.-C., Peng, C.: High voltage Si/SiC hybrid switch: an ideal next step for SiC. IEEE Int. Symp. Power Semicond. Devices IC (ISPSD) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPSD.2015.7123446
  12. Lee, Y.-S., Kim, J.-H., Han, B.-M.: Performance analysis for auxiliary resonant commutated pole inverter with clamping diodes. Trans. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng. 67(12), 1611-1618 (2018)
  13. Karys, S.: Selection of resonant circuit elements for the ARCP inverter. Int. Conf. Electr. Power Qual. Util. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/EPQU.2009.5318855